ipl-logo

Missouri Compromise Essay

1563 Words7 Pages

Slavery was a big issue in the 1800s. It divided the country into an argument between having slavery or not having slavery. It also made a conflict between the north and south and they could not agree on it. Some wanted to keep it, some wanted to get rid of it. The states would argue and they could not come up with a compromise. At the time, there was not a way to completely settle the issue, but there was a way to ease some of the dispute between the states. The Missouri compromise was made to alleviate some of the conflicts over slavery. Slavery all started in 1619 in America when African slaves were taken to Jamestown, Virginia (history.com 2017). Slavery was an acceptable practice throughout the country in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (history.com 2009). African American slaves were taken from their homes and brought to America to be put in other peoples homes and do work (gilderlehrman.org 2009). They were forced to do whatever work their owner told them to do. …show more content…

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017). The South did not like the Missouri Compromise, though. They did not like it due to the fact that Congress would now have the power to make or change any rules dealing with slavery if they felt that they needed to (Forbes

Show More
Related

Why Did Missouri Compromise Deal With The Sectional Conflict Over Slavery

160 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Missouri Compromise After The Civil War

248 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri compromise was a bill introduced to stop the fighting between the states about slavery. Each state before the Missouri compromise was determining wither the states were a free or slave state but when the Missouri compromise was proposed it stated that every state above the 36 degree and 30 degree line were to be free. This officially separated the North from the South. The Missouri compromise along with other problems about slavery is resolved when the civil war comes around. The Missouri compromise and the Mexican American war are similar because America kept wanting to expand and the Mexican American war helped America do that.

Read More

Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

138 Words | 1 Pages

Congress did not really effectively address slavery. The Missouri Compromise "brought about a temporary, or brief, lull in the debate over slavery" (Textbook, 449). The debate over slavery was brief. It did not effectively address slavery. It did not end it, either.

Read More

Changes And Continuities Over Slavery Following The Mexican-American War

914 Words | 4 Pages

Changes and Continuities Over Slavery Following the Mexican-American War The Mexican-American war fought over choice pieces of territory brought greater dissension to an already divided American government. The period before the Mexican-American war was marked by sectionalism amongst the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. The North was primarily for abolition while the South was pro-slavery. This division could be seen in politics as the U.S government was split between the North and South. This division would give way to conflict amongst Americans of different opinions The period before 1848, the end of the Mexican-American war, was hallmarked by conflicts over slave and free states, however the period after the Mexican-American

Read More

Social Tension Dbq

572 Words | 3 Pages

Emme DiPasquale Period 2 APUSH D’Amico The social tension between the North and the South had ultimately divided the United States in ways that threatened the Union. Seeking compromise, the United States went forth with the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850, but this did not prevent what began in 1861, the Civil War. Slavery was a large aspect to the reason of the split between the North and South, as the North disagreed with slavery and fought for it to end, while the South favored slavery and fought for it to stay in the United States. The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri Compromise, was created to attempt to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states. Along with

Read More

Advantages Of Missouri Compromise

690 Words | 3 Pages

This proposed plan was called the Missouri Compromise. The compromise stated that slavery states could not be admitted higher than the 36 degree 30’ north parallel-with the exception of Missouri. However, to balance the addition of one pro slavery state, a district of Massachusetts, named Maine, was also admitted to the union as a anti slavery state. This allowed both factions the addition of a state, without losing or gaining any power over the other. This was why the Missouri Compromise truly was a compromise and benefited both the pro slavery states and the anti slavery

Read More

The Missouri Compromise: The Fire Of War

139 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was definite attempt by the government to shove the issue out of view. By the time the Missouri Compromise was introduced, a few northern states were already in the process of abolishing slavery, as was England. The government was finally recognizing the cruelties of slavery but did not want to anger the southern plantation owners. Thus, they created the Missouri Compromise in order to ease their guilt and face the least contempt. The Missouri Compromise was only able to increase the brewing conflict of slavery between northern states and southern states.

Read More

Henry Clay's Role In The Missouri Compromise

530 Words | 3 Pages

Missouri Compromise The Missouri Compromise was the effort of Congress to end the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be permitted. The Missouri Compromise happened in 1820. It is important because Congress passed a bill granting Missouri statehood as a slave state under the condition that it was to be forever prohibited in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams, and James Tallmadge were involved in the Missouri Compromise.

Read More

Missouri Compromise Essay

509 Words | 3 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was an attempt by the United States government to diffuse the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery had arisen in the recent years due to the expansion of the country. The question of slavery in every new territory rocked the nation. The Missouri Compromise was one of the government’s last attempts to fix it diplomatically.

Read More

Why Is The North West Ordinance Important

510 Words | 3 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a rule that regulated slavery in the southern states. America did this to even out the Non-Slave states and the Slavery states. This compromise was made in 1820 by Henry Clay. Henry Clay was a lawyer and a politician that was very involved in the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

Read More

Political Disputes Before 1860

478 Words | 2 Pages

The U.S was only able to settle political disputes through compromise until 1860 because of the increasing sectionalism, the Abolitionist Movement and the Secession of South Carolina. New states joined into congress creating an unbalanced senate forcing congress to make decisions to balance the nation between freedom and slavery. The Missouri Compromise failed as an attempt to maintain peace between the North and South because it created an greater sense of sectionalism throughout the country. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a decision to make Missouri a slave state to maintain an even number of free and slave states. It led to uproar in congress and the North retaliated by declaring the rest of the Louisiana territory to be free.

Read More

How The Divide Between The North And Southern States During The 1800s

2152 Words | 9 Pages

The final result of much debate and discussion was the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Authored by Henry Clay of Kentucky, the compromise called for Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state and Maine, on the other hand, to be admitted as a free state. This section of the Compromise temporarily settled the dispute between the North and South over power in Congress. The Compromise also named a future plan for territories applying for statehood in the Union. It stated that “other than Missouri, slavery would be prohibited in any part of the Louisiana Purchase territory that lay north of Missouri’s southern border” (Panchyk 72).

Read More

Civil War Unavoidable In The 1800's Essay

455 Words | 2 Pages

In January of 1820, the Missouri Compromise set a boundary line between free and slave territory. It was an effort by Congress to resolve the sectional and political rivalries. The Missouri Compromise was criticized by many southerners because it established the principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery. But northerners condemned it for accepting in the expansion of slavery. However, the act helped hold the Union together for more than thirty years.

Read More

Missouri Compromise Essay

601 Words | 3 Pages

Missouri wanted to enter the nation as a slave state which would cause a problem, the North was concerned by the unbalance that it would cause within the Senate. So congressman James Tallmadge "proposed a ban on the importation of slaves into Missouri and the slow freedom of its black residents". As a way to make the North happy, the House of Representatives passed the bill that granted Maine as a free state. In addition, as part of the compromise, slavery would be not allowed slavery in the north of the 36°30 ' parallel line. The issue over the Missouri Compromise caused controversy within Congress.

Read More

More about Missouri Compromise Essay

Open Document