ipl-logo

Advantages Of Missouri Compromise

690 Words3 Pages

ESSAY: MISSOURI COMPROMISE

Compromises have both highs and lows. One of the most widely used criticisms of compromises is that no one gets their way when a compromise is made between two sides. However, in the case of the Missouri Compromise, this was not a problem-in the end. In the beginning however, many problems had to be overcome in order for the compromise to suit both the anti-slavery North and the pro-slavery south. A problem arose when Missouri was proposed as a possible new state to be admitted to the Union. This very quickly became the subject of a national debate. Prior to this proposition, there was an equal amount of pro slavery states in the south and anti slavery states in the north. This meant that the pro slavery and antislavery factions had equal representation in the United States Congress. However, a new state admitted to the Union would disturb this balance, potentially making one faction stronger than the other, causing a large scale confrontation between the pro slavery south and the anti slavery north. This is why this quickly became a heated topic. …show more content…

This proposed plan was called the Missouri Compromise. The compromise stated that slavery states could not be admitted higher than the 36 degree 30’ north parallel-with the exception of Missouri. However, to balance the addition of one pro slavery state, a district of Massachusetts, named Maine, was also admitted to the union as a anti slavery state. This allowed both factions the addition of a state, without losing or gaining any power over the other. This was why the Missouri Compromise truly was a compromise and benefited both the pro slavery states and the anti slavery

Show More
Related
297 Words | 2 Pages

One key issue between the two parts of the country was whether or not slavery would expand westward to any newly acquired territories. This had been an issue for a long time and ultimately after failing to reach a compromise the country fell back on popular sovereignty or letting people in the new territories decide whether or not they wanted slaver. This however provided no solution as can be seen in the incident “Bleeding Kansas”. This was a series of violent acts in Kansas between those who were for and against slaver.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was necessary because the south wanted slavery to continue while the nation was growing. Most states in the North had outlawed slavery. However, the South did not want slavery to end because it was the foundation of the economy and plantations. So the Missouri Compromise was made to keep the balance of slave states and free states. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state and Maine joined as a free state.

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

Before the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Congress needed to keep the power balanced between slave states and non-slave states in the government. To keep the balance, they passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. This Compromise allowed Missouri into the union as a slave state and allowed Maine into the union as a non-slave state. As a result, the balance between slave states and non-slave states stayed equal. This resulted in neither the North nor the South having an advantage in passing laws.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise greatly limited the growth and development of slavery in the United States. It allowed Missouri to become a state, and to allow slaves, and Maine, as a free state. The compromise also prohibited the practice of slavery in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory. By this time, the importation of slaves from Africa had been outlawed, and they could only be purchased within the country. This meant also meant, that states that entered would be free states.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

The admission of Missouri to the Union was met with discontent because many believed it would disrupt the tranquility of having an even number of slave states and free states. The solution was raised to admit the newest northern state of Maine into the union as a free state, maintaining the balance. After this decision was made, they banned slavery in the new territories above the latitude of 36°30’. This solution was referred to as the Missouri Compromise. This may have been seen a victory because of its limitation on the spread of slavery, but the compromise also led to slavery also becoming more deep-seated in the southern way of

Read More
1751 Words | 8 Pages

Previous to the compromise, the northern states held a majority in the House of Representatives and an equal count in the Senate. The south feared that the addition of Missouri as a free state would give northern states the power to outlaw slavery. Ultimately, the south was able to maintain the former political balance in the Congress. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily settled differences between the regions but could not prevent the inevitable outbreak of the Civil War. An unintentional consequence of another act, the Louisiana Purchase,

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

The new territories would become new states on the United States and the issue of slavery was the controversial issue among the southern and northern states. The northern states wanted to expand to the western hemisphere due to the growth of population and limited acres of land for expansion for industrial production. The south was also seeking land expansion for plantation especially since their economy was dropping, and this is why they wanted to bring slavery in these new territories. Both regions sought a feature but feared one another because of the different view on slavery; and neither one wanted their opponent or region to dominant these

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

The issues being debated include state rights and disagreements over tariffs but the greatest division is on the issue of slavery, which is legal in the South but is gradually being banned by states north of the Mason-Dixon

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

This compromise caused loads of controversy because the Southern senators believed that the territories should be able to decide for themselves if they should allow slavery or not, like the original 13 states. The Southern senators thought the compromise was unconstitutional. On the other hand, the Northern senators argued that Congress actually had the right to say ban slavery in new states. I understand why the Missouri Compromise was created, but I believe that the compromise made the situation worse. To me it was unconstitutional of Congress to deny new states the right to decide if they should allow slavery or not.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The northwest ordinance created a lot of problems for the government. Such as How many people must be in a territory before it could apply for statehood and join the rest of the states. Or how many states could develop in that area. But one of the bigger topics was slavery. What would the government do about the question of slavery, or at least how far would they go?

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

The Missouri Compromise allowed for the admission of Missouri territory as a slave state in the Union. Based on the Missouri Compromise, the inhabitants of Missouri territory were authorized to form a constitution and a state government (Ourdocuments.gov n. p.). The newly formed state of Missouri would be equal to the original states. This document also established an imaginary boundary between Missouri territory and the territory of Louisiana, which was a separation of the free and slave regions. The document notes that the territory under the name of Louisiana, which lies north of 36 degrees and 33 minutes north latitude, is prohibited from slavery (Ourdocuments.gov n.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

Read More

More about Advantages Of Missouri Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document