ipl-logo

Northwest Ordinance Dbq

494 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why did the Constitution allow slavery to continue

The northwest ordinance created a lot of problems for the government. Such as How many people must be in a territory before it could apply for statehood and join the rest of the states. Or how many states could develop in that area. But one of the bigger topics was slavery. What would the government do about the question of slavery, or at least how far would they go? So in order to try and stop slavery from spreading into the newer areas and territories the government forbid slavery. However in this new region the law about slavery being forbidden was just looked over. The territories did not abide by it by no means. They continued to have slavery with the government doing nothing about it. (The constitution: Evolution of a government. 2) The government did nothing about the slave owners in this region. Making the government almost seem to have no power to control any of the people in this new region. Could this have been one of the reasons for the government to just roll over and try and compromise on slavery every time it came up? If the government had done something about this disobedience slavery might not have been able to move into the old northwest or continue to move into the Louisiana purchase. Being able to almost or possibly stop the American civil war before it started. But since slavery was still a very …show more content…

The reason for the Missouri compromise was because Missouri wanted to become a slave state that came out of the Louisiana Purchase. The government did not like this because it would make the slave states outnumber the free states in America. But the government did not want to anger the other slave states by saying no to Missouri in becoming a slave state. So another compromise was made in order to keep the country from fighting. Being the Missouri compromise of 1820.(Jeffersonian Anti-Slavery and Missouri Crisis

Show More
Related
136 Words | 1 Pages

While the North tried to stop the South from withdrawing their spot in the Union, the North also denied the Southern states rights. Sectional groups assembled in the North regarding the “unnatural feeling and hostility” to slavery in the South. “ By consolidating their strength, they have placed the strength... no avail in protecting Southern rights (Document I). The Northerners believed that slavery is not right, and also that “the demand of African slavery throughout the confederacy” is unheard of.

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

It gave character to the country [Doc. B]. Instead of uniting as a nation to reach middle ground on issues of state constitutional rights to govern themselves, which states would be free states and which would be slave states, the regions began to look out for

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

This information above also would have also caused the dispute of slavery in the newfound territories

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

Up until 1860, the government was always able to think up a compromise to satisfy the needs of both. At first, the North only did not want slavery to expand into new territories due to the

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

As time went on and slavery became a more pressing issue the northerners became more against slavery. Sympathies began to grow for abolitionists who were looking to outlaw slavery and slaveholders. The states also argued for their rights as compared to the right of the federal government. Under the Constitution there was little representation of the rights of each individual Free State and therefore the states introduced the idea of nullification where they could choose whether or not they would accept certain federal acts. When the federal government denied this right to the states moving forward the only way to solve the problem in the states eyes was to move towards succession.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

During the Federal Convention the importance was on getting all thirteen states to join the union and therefore compromising played a big role. As a Mr. Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut points out that “the morality or wisdom of slavery are considerations belonging to the states themselves”. There were a few that did oppose slavery thinking that it would “bring the judgment of Heaven on a country” and believed that the federal government did have the right to regulate slave trade. With such division in their thoughts and views of slavery plus the trade of them Mr. Roger Sherman “observed that the abolition of slavery seemed to be going on in the United States, and that the good sense of the several states would probably by degrees complete it”. In the long run, men that were against slavery thought it was more important for the thirteen colonies to come together than the abolishment of slavery knowing that it will come to extinction in the long

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

One issue they faced concerned how they would count slaves for legislative purposes. The free North states thought slaves shouldn’t be counted at all because it would give the slave states an unfair representation due to the high slave population. However, the South disagreed for they feared the Northern states would have a substantial population advantage if the slaves were not counted. They worried that the Northern states would use such an advantage against them to regulate or even abolish slavery. To appease the slavery states they enacted the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Read More
1467 Words | 6 Pages

The federal government was trying to tell states to get rid of slavery without knowing if they could legally even tell them that. One of these disputes was caused by the Dred Scott Decision in 1834 (www.history.com 1of 2). Dred Scott was a slave that

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

Explain how the Northwest Ordinance provided government for the Northwest Territory. Explain how the Northwest Ordinance established a precedent for governing the United States. Develop an argument that a particular provision of the US Constitution would help in addressing a problem facing the United States in the 1780s (Articles of Confederation). Explain a provision of the US Constitution in terms of how it reflects Enlightenment thinking. Identify ratification concerns of the US Constitution.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

Although the northern states didn't tolerate the expansion of slavery within their region, they had no initial intentions of emancipating

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

Even during its infancy, America was divided on the important issue of slavery. Divisions became ever more acute as the practice first died out and then was abolished in most of the North, while the South –in particular the cotton belt of the Deep South- it became an inseparable part of the section’s economy and society. This and the belief of many Americans in the western and southern states in a limited federal government was largely glazed over until the 1840s as more free states were admitted into the union. Southern states became increasingly concerned because they believed that the North might try to abolish slavery and further limit the powers of the state governments once they had a majority in congress. A series of compromises were

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

However, while these causes could not have been resolved to avoid the war, history has proved that the American Civil War was a necessary conflict that shaped the future of America in a way only hitherto imagined. President Lincoln’s Second

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

They eventually created a compromise (the popular sovereignty), which allowed the people of the state to determine if their state would be a slave state. Basically giving the people the power, as a democracy would, to choose if they wanted to have their state with slavery being acceptable or not acceptable. This was caused by Manifest Destiny. In conclusion Manifest Destiny did indeed have an affect on the tension rising between both the slave and free states.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

The North wanted to open up job oppertunities to those who did not work for free in order to benefit both the economy of the country, but the governments ability to fund itself and the states. Slavery would hurt the economy, which would be a main reason why the Notherners would rather abolish it instead of allowing for it to ruin oppertunities for those who look for jobs. However, the Southerners would change their position and act as if they were the victim, claiming that “the North would then ‘ride over us rough shod’ in Congress, ‘proclaim freedom or something equivalent to it to our slaves and reduce us to the condition of Hayti… Our only safety is in equality of POWER.’”(57) They play as if they are the victims of inequality when it comes down to the division in politics and they would fight against the idea of slavery being removed.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

Unfortunately; representatives from South Carolina, Georgia and some from New England were in disagreement with Jefferson’s words against slavery and didn’t want to sign it. Congress argued back and both but, in the end; all of Jefferson 's words and thoughts against slavery was taken out or altered to be more pro slavery friendly. Just two years later, In 1778 Jefferson introduced the Virginia law which made the importation of enslaved Africans illegal in the Northwest areas. It wasn’t until years later in 1784 that Jefferson was actually able to ban slavery once and for all in the Northwest

Read More

More about Northwest Ordinance Dbq

Open Document