ipl-logo

Slave Power Conspiracy

915 Words4 Pages

Before, during and after the Mexican War, notherners argued that a “slave power conspiracy” existed in government. What evidence is there to support that charge? The northerners argued that a “slave power conspiracry” existed in the government for many reasons. One of these many reasons would be the argument of, “Was not Polk a slaveholder? Had he not been elected on a platform of enlarging slave territory by annexing Texas? “ (McPherson 51). Polk was indeed a slave holder and he would benefit the southern states much more than the northern states. He was the President of the United States which held a lot of persuasive power, however, the north believed that it was part of the conspiracy. One of the many things that was also argued against …show more content…

McPherson explains the three concentric circles of the Free Soil party starting at the core and slowing expanding into the outer layers of the circle, forming three different and distinct areas of the circle. At the center of this circle had, “...abolitionists that considered slavery a sinful violation of human rights that should be immediately expiated.” (McPherson 54).At the core, there was a group of radicals who demanded for change and did not believe in the ideaology of slavery whatsoever, promoting an immediate removal of this practice from society. The next layer of the circle had people that had, “antislavery people who looked up upon bondage as an evil- by which they meant that it was socially repressive, economically backward, and politically harmful to the interests of free states.” (54). This secondary group, not being as radical as the first, believed that slavery was a corrupt practice, but they had believed that it was economically harmful and does not benefit both the Northern states and the federal government. The final outer circle did not push for change as much and, “contained all those …show more content…

The North wanted to open up job oppertunities to those who did not work for free in order to benefit both the economy of the country, but the governments ability to fund itself and the states. Slavery would hurt the economy, which would be a main reason why the Notherners would rather abolish it instead of allowing for it to ruin oppertunities for those who look for jobs. However, the Southerners would change their position and act as if they were the victim, claiming that “the North would then ‘ride over us rough shod’ in Congress, ‘proclaim freedom or something equivalent to it to our slaves and reduce us to the condition of Hayti… Our only safety is in equality of POWER.’”(57) They play as if they are the victims of inequality when it comes down to the division in politics and they would fight against the idea of slavery being removed. They fight for the equality in the House, because if they didn’t, they would lose everything they had fought

Show More
Related
697 Words | 3 Pages

However, that only further benefited Slave states. Slavery was disputed again when Northern states wanted the government to have complete power over trade with the other nations. Southern states depended heavily on trade and feared that the North would get enough votes to interfere with their slave and agricultural

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

The thesis of Gabriel’s Rebellion: The Virginia Slave Conspiracies of 1800 and 1802, is to allow the reader to learn in detail about Gabriel’s rebellion. The author Douglas R. Egerton makes this clear throughout the whole book and used many sources to support his thesis and writing. He explains in great detail about the events that led up to the rebellion, during the rebellion, and after the rebellion. He did a great job with writing this book and allowing it to flow together.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Gabriels Conspiracy Back in the 1800’s being a slave was very hard. Do you think you would survive? Well there are many who survived slavery and there are some that took a stand and fought it. These people were leaders and influenced others to take a stand and give it there all in order to abolish slavery.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

In South, torn between the economic benefits of slavery and the moral and constitutional issues raised, and white Southerners grew more and more defensive. They argued that black people were incapable of caring for themselves. They said that slavery was a benevolent institution that kept them fed, clothed, and occupied. Most Northerners did not doubt that black people being inferior to whites, but they did doubt the benevolence of slavery. The Civil War changed the future of the United States.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

As a result of this, racist organizations were founded to wreaked havoc on former slaves. Secret societies in the southern united states, such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia used violence against the blacks. Their goal was often to keep blacks out of politics. Our textbook states, “In other states, where blacks were a majority or where the populations of the two races were almost equal, whites used outright intimidation and violence to undermine the Reconstruction regimes” (Brinkley 368). The people involved in such organizations were using violence to take away the fifteenth amendment right from the former slaves.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Before the Emancipation Proclamation the main focus of the Civil War in the North was that they believed that they had to fight to preserve the Union. At the beginning of the war, abolishing slavery was not a main goal of the North. Southerners believed that they had the right to leave the Union (secede). Southerners wanted independence so that they could keep their traditional way of life, including the having and keeping of slavery. With the issuance of the new Emancipation Proclamation freedom for slaves now became the new goal for the north, while the South wanted to defend

Read More
1546 Words | 7 Pages

For several decades slavery ran ramped in the United States, and by the 1850s-1860s there were different opinions about whether to keep it, abolish it, or contain it where it is. Most understand that the south was pro-slavery, their further intentions were to expand into the new territories the US had purchased from Mexico and from the Louisiana Purchase. Then, there was a small minority group in the north that wished to abolish slavery from the entire US, and this group was disliked by both northerners and southerners. The majority of the north, however, didn’t mind keeping slavery in the south where it already existed, but they did not want it to expand into the new states Congress was carving out of the purchased territories. Each of this groups disliked one

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

The Northern and Southern states had disagreed upon many things between slavery. Even though they had felt the same fear in abolitionist . Thinking of the word and pay that would decrease by freeing the people. Jobs would soon become limited, because the simple fact that slave workers or now African Americans frre would work longer hours for less pay. The south said that the slaves were necessary for the development of the culture.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

The northerners view slavery as a sin unjust immorally wrong, and desire emancipation for the blacks. The northerners felt that slaver would diminish the growth of the economy of the United States and would place a hierarchy upon whites. They felt slavery would have no gain for the feature of this nation. The economy in the northern states was blooming due to the railroads which were being built1860. The railroads would expedite shipments bringing rice in the northern states.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

INTRODUCTION Throughout the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 there were different disputes, mainly centered on the issues of slavery and tariffs. These disputes finally lead to a compromise reached by the delegates present. The northern economy was primarily centered around industrialization. In contrast, the southern economy was mostly agricultural, and widely relied on slaves, as they were the cheapest form of labor accessible.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Westward expansion in the 19th century sparked the controversial question of slavery with respect to the progress of American development. Certainly, determination and sovereignty attracted people to move westward, but countless people were forced into slavery in this supposed new land of liberties. The institution of slavery considerably slowed down, or even reversed, the nation’s progress. Opponents of slavery stood by the ideals of democracy. That is to say, “in the name of liberty that is fettered” (Douglass) they stood by the ideal that slavery violated fundamental rights.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

The South consisted of slaves states and the North consisted of free states. The South’s outlook of slavery was that is beneficial for them in order to grow economically. By allowing the slaves to do the labor work on the farms without paying them was part of their plan to make a agriculture living. On the other hand, the North was more about trading and using factories to make goods where in that case they did not need slaves for those jobs. These differences were just too much for the South.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Keene, Jennifer D., Saul Cornell, and Edward T. O’Donnell. Visions of America: A History of the United States. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013. Trott, S. “A Pro Slavery Letter by S. Trott.” Edited by TeachUSHistory.org.

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

Read More
339 Words | 2 Pages

After the Mexican-American war, America claimed an expanse of land in the west. The question of whether this new land would be slave-states or free soil, was a hot topic and highly controversial and was in fact, the main cause of the Civil War. Even some of the other issues that may have led to the war can relate back to slavery. For instance: The south wanted to succeed from the union and have less control from the federal government, because they were trying to outlaw slavery not only in the southern states, but also keep the newly acquired land slave-free. Lincoln, in the beginning of his presidential campaign attempted to tone down slavery position and said the war was to “preserve the union” which was part of the cause of the war, however,

Read More

More about Slave Power Conspiracy

Open Document