ipl-logo

Examples Of Regional Differences In The 1800s

1751 Words8 Pages

Regional Differences in the 1800s The Election of 1800 realigned America with Jefferson’s Republican platform after a continuous stretch of Federalist control. Although he was an advocate for states’ rights, his saying, “We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists,” reflected an equally strong desire to unite the country, despite internal political divisions. Jefferson’s acquisition of the Louisiana Territory greatly extended the borders of the nation, a clear invitation for settlers to look west. The implications of such movement showed no pity for the indigenous people and further forced Indians beyond the limits of their native lands. Relentless settlers submerged themselves in the idea of manifest destiny and were therefore largely …show more content…

The rebirth of Christianity reminded many that slavery was a sin, providing the basic moral reasoning as to why the institution required reform. The long-standing tradition, which many believed would eventually dissipate, continued its stretch from the early 17th century. The country grew in a considerably divisive manner, the south even taking pride in their heavily-established slavery system. When Missouri wanted admission into the Union, increasing friction dictated it necessary for the proposal of the Missouri Compromise by Henry Clay, in which Missouri would be admitted into the Union as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Slavery would also be prohibited in all states above the Mason Dixon line. Previous to the compromise, the northern states held a majority in the House of Representatives and an equal count in the Senate. The south feared that the addition of Missouri as a free state would give northern states the power to outlaw slavery. Ultimately, the south was able to maintain the former political balance in the Congress. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily settled differences between the regions but could not prevent the inevitable outbreak of the Civil War. An unintentional consequence of another act, the Louisiana Purchase, …show more content…

Throughout Jackson’s presidency, he was particularly insistent on the removal of Indians from American territory. Jackson’s Indian Removal Act of 1830 garnered support from both northern and southern regions with economic incentives in mind that prioritized expansion over preservation of Indian homelands. The law established Indians as foreign people who were subject to treaties with the United States. Therefore, the act allowed Jackson to withdraw Indians east of the Mississippi and coerce them westward. The brutality of Jackson’s policy was revealed in his opinions on the possible assimilation of Indians. These tribes had established schools, developed their own constitution, and had a written language. The Indian population even comprised of several who dressed according to white fashion and became slaveholders. Although the white culture had exhibited its influence on traditional Indian culture, Jackson continued to deny Indian hopes of coexistence in American land. He saw them unfit for the likes of whites and as a hindrance to the rapidly progressing frontier. Their savage practices would set them up for failure, Jackson claimed. Underestimating their resistance, he believed that the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole tribes would voluntarily emigrate. Most tribes did relocate, as they saw no other means to survival than to submit to Jackson’s orders. The brutal migration eventually

Show More
Related
124 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a kind of an agreement between the two sides (the pro and the anti-slavery sections) with the purpose of regulating slavery in the western territories. Excluding Missouri, this settlement banned slavery in the new states of the Arkansas territory. The Missouri Compromise recognized that the Congress had no right to impose over states claiming admission to the union conditions that dit not call to those states already in the union and also established a precedent for the relegation of slavery from public territory obtained after the Constitution. After the admission of Missouri in 1821, there were no states admitted until 1836 when Arkansas became a slave state and followed by Michigan which became a free

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

Jackson presidency was marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations by imitating a policy of Indian removal. Before the removal, he made about 70 treaties with Native American tribes both in the South and the Northwest. His First Annual Message to Congress and some others begins in December of 1829, which contained remarks on the present and future state of American Indians in the United States. He argued that it was for the Indians own well, that they should be resettled on the vacant lands west of the Mississippi River. During the time in Congress, debates on a bill didn’t begin until late February 1830.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson’s plans of removal were favored by many Americans as he convinced them that it was practical and for the better good of Native Americans. Jackson stated that he had given them many incentives to leave. Native Americans would be provided with ample supplies and supported for a year after their move to western lands. Jackson believed that this was a practical resolution to the issues developing between the two nations. Jackson acknowledged that the intrusion of Americans onto western land was occurring, but he did not believe that it was a genuine problem.

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Due to the threat of unequal representation in the Senate, Missouri’s entrance to the Union as a possible slave state caused a separation between the North and South. Prior to the concern of slavery in Missouri, the Union had maintained an equal balance of free and slave states in the Senate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was the agreement, which allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state in addition to Missouri’s entrance as a slave state to recreate the

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

The country was divided self-consciously with different priorities. The dispute of slavery came to the forefront in American politics, primarily in the South because of their asset in large scale agriculture. The issue came to head when the debate whether the Missouri Territory was going to be entered as a free a state. The result was the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Calhoun boldly stated his view from the Senate floor in 1837 that the race-based slavery that was prominent in the South was “instead of an evil, a good- positive good.”

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Ednica Maxineau An Analysis of President Andrew Jackson’s Speech Concerning The Indian Removal Act When we look back on history in America and discuss the topics regarding human rights and oppression, the first thing that might come to mind is slavery of the black population and white supremacy. However, we often tend to forget about other groups that were also subjected to discrimination, racism, and oppression. One group in particular which faced harsh conditions and discrimination were the Native Americans. The Native Americans were described as uncivilized savage hunters by the American government compared to the Europeans who were looked upon as civilized and respected. The Native Americans faced racial and religious discrimination.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

There was also the belief that there was gold to be found where the Native tribes lived. President Jackson was a powerful  rival of Indian tribes. He reported that two important tribes had accepted the arrangements made for their removal  and they believed that two tribe examples would convince the remaining tribes to look for the same obvious advantages. President Jackson supported a speedy removal and he felt it was important not only to the United States but to the Indians themselves. Moving the Indians would segregate them from instant contact with whites, free them from the power of the States, allow them to pursue happiness, and would stop their slow

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Jackson and other supporters claimed that if the Indians stayed east of the Mississippi, they would eventually become extinct. White settlers would continually invade their land destroying Indian life and culture. Jackson argued that if they moved west of the Mississippi, it would solve both their issue as well as preserving

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

The Creek Indians were defeated and forced to sign treaties that would relinquish twenty-million acres of land. In Jacksons presidency, he was approved by Congress to fulfill the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This act granted land exchange which placed the natives in new property under U.S. protection. “Jackson and his followers were free to persuade, bribe, and threaten tribes into signing removal treaties and leaving the Southeast.”, he succeeded to where 50,000 eastern Indians were moved. Soldiers escorted the natives to their new territory.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

Read More
1452 Words | 6 Pages

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, the United States federal government was trying promote westward expansion in the United States of America. They tried to do this in many ways and the methods that they used drastically changed and shaped the country. The United States federal government was trying very hard in the late 1800s and early 1900s to expand the country westward and their actions had many major impacts on the United States of America. Some of their actions include: relocating the indigenous Native Americans, passing the Homestead Act, and greatly promoting the construction of railroads. All of these efforts greatly altered the country and the lives of the Native Americans and the United States citizens.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

The Market Revolution generated a drastic change in the United States economy and altered gender barriers while at the same time accomplishing this in a provocative manner. This economic boom occurred around the first half of the 19th Century. The economic boom was achieved by inventions such as a transcontinental railroad system which resulted in a better transportation system which improved trade and the cotton gin which sped up the rate of removing seeds from cotton fiber. However like what the great Hugo said, “The brutalities of progress are called revolutions. When they are over we realize this: that the human race has been roughly handled, but that it has advanced”.

Read More

More about Examples Of Regional Differences In The 1800s

Open Document