ipl-logo

Summary Of Andrew Jackson's Speech Concerning The Indian Removal Act

951 Words4 Pages

Ednica Maxineau

An Analysis of President Andrew Jackson’s Speech
Concerning The Indian Removal Act

When we look back on history in America and discuss the topics regarding human rights and oppression, the first thing that might come to mind is slavery of the black population and white supremacy. However, we often tend to forget about other groups that were also subjected to discrimination, racism, and oppression. One group in particular which faced harsh conditions and discrimination were the Native Americans. The Native Americans were described as uncivilized savage hunters by the American government compared to the Europeans who were looked upon as civilized and respected. The Native Americans faced racial and religious discrimination. …show more content…

When the U.S started to rapidly expand westward, there were major conflicts between white settlers and the Native Americans who occupied those regions. The need to push Native Americans out of their ancestral lands led to President Andrew Jackson’s speech concerning the Indian Removal Act on December 6, 1830. The Indian Removal Act was put in place by the United States government to move the Native Americans west of the Mississippi River into what was described to be “Indian Territory” (Bentley, 2011, p. 679). In his speech, President Andrew Jackson stated that the Indian Removal Act would “ Place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.” It was very evident that the Native Americans were in fact portrayed as savages and unequal to the American people. President Andrew Jackson described the Indian Removal Act as an advantage that would bring obvious benefits to the lives of the Native Americans people, when in reality they were taking away the hunting grounds and ancestral lands of the people. The Native Americans were given the choice of assimilating to American ways and religions or to evacuate their properties and take part of the removal. The government believed that the first two tribes that do agree to be removed might be used as an example to induce other tribes to seek the same “Obvious …show more content…

Although President Andrew Jackson painted a very positive image on the Indian Removal Act, the outcomes were far from positive. One particular brutal outcome of the Indian Removal Act was the trail of tears. The trail of tears was the name given to the migration of the Cherokees, who suffered an eight hundred mile migration from the eastern woodlands to Oklahoma (Bentley, 2011, p. 679). During the migration period, this group experienced starvation, death from disease and difficulties of relocation. The Native Americans were subjected to a foreign and unknown land far from their home which presented great challenges for their

Show More
Related

Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More

Comparison Of Andrew Jackson's Message To Congress And Indian Removal Act

281 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress and “Samuel’s Memory” are about the same topic, the Indian Removal Act, but are two completely different pieces. Both are told from two very different points of views. Both evoke very different emotions. One was written to persuade people and justify the Act and the other was written to show the horror of the Act and the devastation of how the act affected the Indian people. While both are about the same topic, they are nowhere near the same.

Read More

Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq Essay

684 Words | 3 Pages

A Shameful Part of American History The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was America’s first attempt to legally remove Native Americans from their land. This primary source was created by the Senate and House of Representatives, and it was backed by President Andrew Jackson. Passed on May 28th, the act allowed the for the relocation of Natives west of the Mississippi River. This order was a result of Manifest Destiny which was the belief that it was the United State’s God-given right to expand westward.

Read More

Removal Act Vs. Remini's 'Andrew Jackson And His Indian Wars'

438 Words | 2 Pages

Robert V. Remini argued in “Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars” that the Indian Removal Act was the only way to save the Native Americans from being extinct. He proposed this act to not only to save the Native Americans from being extinct, but also ““... could and would protect them fully in the possession of the soil, and their right of self government...to be our equals in privileges, civil, and religious.”” (285). He had been concern about the safety of the Native Americans for many years since white settlers were hungry for land and would do anything for it. Moving to the west would let the Native Americans do what they wanted to do and live freely.

Read More

Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

478 Words | 2 Pages

The forced removals, like the Trails of Tears, demonstrated a disregard for the rights and well-being of Native American communities. In the passage, “Jackson’s Treatment of Native People”, it states, “This event will

Read More

Cherokees Response To The Indian Removal Act Of 1830

1887 Words | 8 Pages

This essay considers how Cherokees responded to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act, promoted by the seventh President of the United States Andrew Jackson, enabled the United States government to relocate the “Five Civilized Tribes” to reservations west of the Mississippi River. The majority of Americans supported removing Southeastern Amerindians. American settlers were eager to gain access to Cherokee lands in Georgia. The Indian Removal Act resulted in the mass transplantation of Indian tribes known as the “Trail of Tears.”

Read More

The Indian Removal Act: The Trail Of Tears By President Andrew Jackson

317 Words | 2 Pages

The Indian Removal Act also known as the “Trail of Tears” was signed on May 28, 1830 by President Andrew Jackson. Allowing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi for exchange of Indian lands inside the state borders. He forced the westward move of the "five civilized" Native American tribes, the Creeks, Chickasaws, Seminoles, Cherokees and Choctaws. A few tribes went without trouble, but many resisted the policy. About 4,000 Cherokees died when the United States government forcibly moved them during the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839.

Read More

Summary Of The Trail Of Tears: A Cherokee Legacy

1159 Words | 5 Pages

The Trail o f Tears: A Cherokee LegacyThe discovery of the New World in the late 1400s by Christopher Columbus led to the end of the Old World. Many troubles have arisen amongst the original inhabitants of the New World such as Native Americans. After the discovery of the New World by Christopher Columbus, Native Americans were abused, exploited, and suffered at the hands of many Europeans. In the Trail of Tears: A Cherokee Legacy, Chip Richie analyzes the forced removal ofNative Americans from their sacred land by President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Indian Removal Act resulted in the deaths of many Native Americans, and this long journey became known as The Trail of Tears.

Read More

How Does Andrew Jackson Use Land As A Symbol Of Human Existence?

918 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, President Andrew Jackson felt so passionately about owning land that he was willing to forcibly remove the indigenous people from their natural land. In his address to congress on The Indian Removal Act he writes, “. By opening the whole territory between Tennessee on the north and Louisiana on the south to the settlement of the whites it will incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier and render the adjacent States strong enough to repel future invasions without remote aid. It will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those States to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power”. This captures the idea that by obtaining land Americans will be doing a greater deed than ridding the country of the “savage” Native Americans.

Read More

Trail Of Tears Research Paper

1086 Words | 5 Pages

The Genocide: Trail of Tears/ The Indian removal act During the 1830s the united states congress and president Andrew Jackson created and passed the “Indian removal act”. Which allowed Jackson to forcibly remove the Indians from their native lands in the southeastern states, such as Florida and Mississippi, and send them to specific “Indian reservations” across the Mississippi river, so the whites could take over their land. From 1830-1839 the five civilized tribes (The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chickasaw) were forced, sometimes by gun point, to march about 1,000 miles to what is present day Oklahoma.

Read More

Andrew Jackson Case For The Removal Act Analysis

557 Words | 3 Pages

White residents of the United States clashed with the Indigenous people on land, food, and rights, without a permanent compromise. In 1829, President Andrew Jackson proposes to move all Indigenous people within America’s current territory to reservations. After being pursued for nearly thirty years, the Choctaw and the Chickasaw tribes agreed for their removal. This would allow whites to live their civilized lives as the Indigenous people cast off their savage habits in remote reservations. President Jackson’s Case for the Removal Act shows that those of power and majority decide the terms of segregation.

Read More

Andrew Jackson's Address On Indian Removal

271 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson, in his “Address on Indian Removal” speech, argues that his Act, which relocates Native Americans in the South East, is ultimately beneficial for both the United States and the Indians. To slowly degrade the opinions congressmen have on the Indians and conjure sympathetic emotions, Jackson uses derogatory words which further diminish the little respect congressmen have for the Native Americans. For example, almost every paragraph contains the word “savage” which connotes incivility, barbarism, and stupidity. The use of “savage” allows Jackson to imply that America is better than the “red men” and should decide their fate in order to protect them. Furthermore, towards the end of the second paragraph Jackson uses words like “retard,”

Read More

1830 Indian Removal

860 Words | 4 Pages

Cherokee Chief John Ross began to devise a plan to counter this removal and he stated with the Blood Law which stated that any Cherokee that made a deal to sell land to the United States without the consent of the entire tribe faced dire and certain consequences. Chief Ross then set out to take the Cherokee case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In the case of Worcester v Georgia the U.S. Chief Justice, John Marshall ruled The Cherokee Nation is a distinct community, occupying its own territory with boundaries accurately described and which the laws of Georgia can have no force and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter but with the consent of the Cherokees themselves. The Cherokees were astatic with this ruling. However,

Read More

Indian Removal Act Research Paper

1311 Words | 6 Pages

The life of Native Americans before and after the government issued the Indian Removal Act created a lasting effect on our nation. Native Americans were forced by the US government to vacate their lands. Surprisingly, nearly 125,000 Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida, which was all land that their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations (“Indian 1”). By the end of the 1890, very few Natives remained anywhere in the lands east of the Mississippi River (“Indian 1”). The Natives were forced to leave these land, because of the whites moving in who wanted the soft, fertile land, because of its farming capability.

Read More

Native Americans In The 19th Century

951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More

More about Summary Of Andrew Jackson's Speech Concerning The Indian Removal Act

Related Topics

Open Document