Why Is Missouri Compromise Necessary
It can be argued that the Missouri Compromise not only put off the start of the Civil War, but was also a cause. Many contributing factors led up to the Civil War in the years following the passing after the Missouri Compromise. Years after the Missouri Compromise went into effect, Congress passed the Tariff Act of 1833, sometimes called the Compromise Tariff. This was proposed by Henry Clay, and called for the gradual reduction of tariffs, ending the Nullification Crisis. In 1846, United States’ President James Polk requested 2 million dollars to purchase land from Mexico following the Mexican-American War.
I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.
The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.
Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt.
“But this momentous question, like a fireball in The night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union” (Jefferson). This is from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Holmes in 1820 talking about the issue of slavery and the Missouri Compromise, and Thomas Jefferson was afraid that the Congress may keep on compromising to satiate the south’s want for slavery. The people in the north and the south kept I arguing till the Civil War, whether slavery should be continued or if they should get rid of this abominable institution, but Henry Clay did not want there to be a civil war so he helped write a compromise to keep the peace between the feuding halves of America dreaming that peace would be achieved. Even though many people in the south of America through the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be beneficial, it ultimately failed, and it only postponed
So, this essay will explain one from the other. The Missouri Compromise has many differences from the Compromise of 1850. One difference would be that in breaking up the different parts of the Louisiana Territory, it created peace between Northerners and Southerners. The Northerners were happy that more territory was safe for freed slaves, although they weren't quite happy that there was still slavery in the USA. However, the southerners stayed happy until the Southerners realized that this gave congress a say in which states could have slavery.
Thesis Both Nationalism and Sectionalism developed concurrently during the Era of Good Feelings. The two main reasons why nationalism increased was because of Henry Clay’s American System and Monroe’s policy to increase nationalism. Clay’s AS created a better national infrastructure that tightened America together. Monroe’s policy was to promote national unity and America’s power, which strengthens nationalism.
The Missouri Compromise was made as an attempt to deal with the debate that had been going on about slavery. It lasted thirty-four years, but never truly made the North orouth totally happy with the situation. Although the Missouri Compromise did push back the debate on slavery in Missouri, it did not solve the problem as a whole. The tension between the North and South was, in fact reduced for a period of time. Once the Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional, the tension once again grew.
During the Jefferson administration, the United States had bought a territory from the French called the Louisiana Territory. But there was still a defining issue prominent over this new land, slavery. Thus came the Missouri Compromise, in which the US government prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude above the 36 30 parallel (Doc 2). However, this compromise only temporarily resolved the debate over slavery.
The Missouri Compromise greatly limited the growth and development of slavery in the United States. It allowed Missouri to become a state, and to allow slaves, and Maine, as a free state. The compromise also prohibited the practice of slavery in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory. By this time, the importation of slaves from Africa had been outlawed, and they could only be purchased within the country. This meant also meant, that states that entered would be free states.
The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.
This compromise stated every thing north of a specific longitude and latitude were never allowed to become slave states. The Missouri Compromise was violated by a Senator in a free state upsetting citizens in other states. This was seen as a slap in the face of those that viewed slavery as a vital part of their way of life. Many people of the time had very deeply rooted feelings and traditions that either supported or loathed slavery. Each group was trying to force their personal beliefs on each other which helped fuel a long building rift.
The end result of the Dred Scott decision was Chief Justice Roger Taney 's decision that Congress did not possess the jurisdiction to stop slavery from spreading into other territories, even if they were considered free. Even worse, any free Black could now be allowably forced into slavery. Being forced into slavery was also seen as being beneficial to the free Blacks. Instead of reaching a decision as President Buchanan had hoped, it had started a rapid expansion of the conflict. This rapid expansion over the issue of slavery eventually led to the Civil War.
The cause of the Civil War was led by the constant stream of conflicting ideas and laws such as the seemingly inequitable Missouri Compromise, the gory battles effectuated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the invidious Dred Scott decision that caused bloodshed and hostility between the North and South of the United States. The war had multiple different potential causes, but they all root back to conflicts on slavery and reliance on the system they’ve accustomed themselves to. The secession of the Southern states, or the formal withdrawal from the nation, was the final breaking point that sparked the Civil War, but many events before that led to the event. The Missouri Compromise dealt with handling the balance between slave and free states.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).
More about Why Is Missouri Compromise Necessary
Missouri Compromise That Led Up To The Civil War Essay
119 Words | 1 PagesWhy Did Missouri Compromise Deal With The Sectional Conflict Over Slavery
160 Words | 1 PagesMissouri Compromise Research Paper
328 Words | 2 PagesDbq Missouri Compromise
595 Words | 3 PagesMissouri Compromise Of 1820 Dbq Essay
605 Words | 3 PagesDifferences Between 1850 And Missouri Compromise Of 1850
575 Words | 3 PagesDbq Nationalism And Sectionalism
829 Words | 4 PagesWhat Are The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise
205 Words | 1 PagesCivil War Dbq Essay
869 Words | 4 PagesWhat Was The Missouri Compromise
261 Words | 2 PagesCompromises Between 1820 And 1860
1121 Words | 5 PagesHow Did African Americans Contribute To Conflict
594 Words | 3 PagesThe Expansion Of Slavery And The Civil War
94 Words | 1 PagesThe Missouri Compromise: The Cause Of The Civil War
942 Words | 4 PagesMissouri Compromise Essay
1563 Words | 7 Pages