ipl-logo

Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

1309 Words6 Pages

Before the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Congress needed to keep the power balanced between slave states and non-slave states in the government. To keep the balance, they passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. This Compromise allowed Missouri into the union as a slave state and allowed Maine into the union as a non-slave state. As a result, the balance between slave states and non-slave states stayed equal. This resulted in neither the North nor the South having an advantage in passing laws. This Compromise was good for the time being but as time went on, the argument between the North and South about their differing political views on slavery grew, which overall led to the Civil War. Although some may argue that the Civil War was caused …show more content…

This election and the new political rules that came with the Compromise of 1850 led to the Civil War.
Newly elected President Lincoln was highly against slavery. He refused to have any exceptions to slavery. He. He wanted it abolished in the entire United States. In addition, he refused to allow slavery in the new territories that the United States had bought (Doc 7). This caused a lot of anger in the South because their economy relied heavily on slavery, and if Lincoln abolished it, the South's economy would be in shambles. This continuing debate on slavery and Lincoln's refusal to budge on abolishing slavery was a major political issue and, as a result, the idea of a civil war formed. As a result, of Lincoln being elected President, the South tried to convince Lincoln and the North that slavery wasn’t as bad as it seems. The South created these pictures and stories to convince the North that slavery wasn’t bad and so they could keep slavery in the South. Harriet Beecher Stowe strongly disproved the lies the South had through the novel “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. Stowe explained throughout her book the true struggles of a slave and how slaves were treated in the South. Stowe's book was directed toward the North to inform them that the South's political …show more content…

First of which was allowing popular sovereignty. Meaning each new state was allowed to vote to be a slave state or not. Popular sovereignty caused many people to flood the new territories to sway the state to either be a slave state or a free state. The people of the North and South wanted their ideas and way of life to continue throughout the new land, so they all fought for places in these new states. As a result, they would hope that the voting would go their way and that their ideas would have a stronger place in government. The “battle” for creating states with or against slavery got so intense that people ended up voting in states where they didn’t live to have their ideas be politically stronger. I saw this when Kansas tried to hold a vote to decide if it was going to be a free state or not and most of the votes that were made were made by citizens of Missouri (Doc 3). This obsession with political power separated the North and South further and increased the chances of a Civil War. The next rule that came from the Compromise of 1850, which also led to the Civil War, was that slaves who made it to the free North still could be arrested. I explained this through the court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857. The Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney stated slaves didn’t have the right to sue nor the right to be considered citizens in the North. He also

Show More
Related
61 Words | 1 Pages

The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually serve in calming the disagreement. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even more greater issues than needed,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for our nation.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

In 1819, Missouri wanted to join the union as a free state. This upset the Confederacy because it set off the balance between the free and slave states. In order to keep behaviors civil, Congress made a two-part compromise, which allowed Missouri to join as a free state, but Maine also got added in as a free state. The United States had 22 states at the

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

In the early half of the 19th century, the differences between the North and South resulted in the Civil War. The major difference between the two was that the North was anti-slavery, and the South was pro-slavery. Since the difference between the two territories was so drastic, it is safe to say that slavery was the overarching cause of the Civil War. The outburst of the Civil War was built on the frustration of the poor treatment of slaves, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In the South, a central reason for slaves was so that they would help maintain a landowner’s planation.

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

However, at that time, there was a perfect balance between free and slave states in Congress. Admitting Missouri would essentially hand all the power to the south. In order to settle both parties’ desires the Missouri Compromise was drawn. It admitted Missouri as a slave state, and simultaneously admitted Maine as a free state to preserve the balance in Congress.

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

In the time period between 1820 and 1860, slavery was an ongoing issue in America. To resolve this issue people turned to compromises and documents. Overtime the south began to lose respect for the North leading to a need for separation. The North begin to wage a war on slavery, in the process is regarding their constitutional duties. The conflicts residing between the North and South along with the government's inability to control the issues made compromise impossible.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

The Missouri Compromise, Sectionalism, the steady rise in the Abolitionist Movement, and the election of Abraham Lincoln all contributed to the conflict which began the Civil War. The continuous disagreements regarding slavery between the North and South divided the Union early on. Differences in culture, education and social practices cultivated the growing divide between regions. Most northern states had completely abolished slavery by the beginning of the nineteenth century, causing the conflict of interest politically between the North and South. With the western territories being settled at a rapid pace, a fierce political competition heated between the North and South.

Read More
1168 Words | 5 Pages

Initially, the first Missouri compromise of 1820 was an agreement between South and North involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the western territory. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel of 36, 30' line except within the boundary of the proposed state of Missouri. In other words, the imaginary 36, 30 lines across the southern border of Missouri stated that anything above that line is a free state and anything below that line is a sate. The issue of this compromise was that the admission of Missouri as a slave state would give slave states (southern) control over the senate. This crisis was averted when Maine was admitted to the union to balance out the states.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

Roger Taney was the chief justice from 1836- 1864. He made the ruling for the Dred Scott case. The ruling that sent northerns into a blaze and led southern 's to rejoice. Dred Scott was a slave, who was taken to a free territory. Taney ruled that slaves were property and that they didn’t have the right to sue as it says in document number 9.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Compromise, a resolution of a conflict that is achieved only if both sides come to a mutual conscientious, was used to terminate political conflicts. The North and South relied heavily on this aspect since they had two distinct perspectives regarding slavery. However, compromise did not have the great effect as it was visioned because it furthered tension between the North and South by rewarding the South fully with slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 initially was seen as just because there was a 36°30 N line established to balance the amount of free and slave states.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 sparked debate in regards to the expansion of slavery into the western territories. Missouri requested statehood but wanted to come in as a slave state. Having Missouri come in, as a slave state would disrupt the equal balance between free and slave states. In an effort to regulate slavery in the western states, Jesse Thomas suggested that an amendment to be implemented into the Missouri Compromise that would ban slavery north of latitude 36°30’ in the Louisiana Purchase. This would include the Southern border of Missouri and the area west of Mississippi.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

While looking at a map of the electoral college vote (Doc. H), it is clear that the country was geographically divided, and this had the result of increased feelings of separation for the South, from the rest of the country. Lincoln realized that no more compromises could be made, and during a speech in Alton, Illonois, he tried to turn the issues away from the main topic which resulted in all the compromises, slavery (Doc. G). In a way he was making another compromise, but the South did not like it one bit, so they later succeed from the

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Lastly, a fugitive slave law was passed. The compromise of 1850 played a key role leading up to the Civil War because it only made matters worse between the north and south, because neither of them were fully appeased. The compromise only delayed the conflict. A significant part of the compromise of 1850, was the fugitive slave act.

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

Although the cause of the war was later twisted into looking like states’ rights, the actual cause of the Civil War was slavery. Two years before the Civil War officially began, people were already wary of the problems that slavery could cause in the nation. In his “House Divided” Speech at the Republican Convention in

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

Read More

More about Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document