ipl-logo

Dred Scott Dbq

443 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Causes of the civil war essay free

Roger Taney was the chief justice from 1836- 1864. He made the ruling for the Dred Scott case. The ruling that sent northerns into a blaze and led southern 's to rejoice. Dred Scott was a slave, who was taken to a free territory. Taney ruled that slaves were property and that they didn’t have the right to sue as it says in document number 9. He also ruled that it goes against the fifth amendment:“...No person shall be deprived the right to life, liberty, and property without due process law…” ( document 9). Even if Taney had Dred Scott free the case still would’ve led to the civil war even though the Northerns would’ve been happy the southerns would’ve been and thrown hissy fits.
Southerns were happy when they heard that Preston Brooks beat …show more content…

His goal was to arm slaves in the area and cause a slave uprising. The raid got everyone killed including John Brown himself. He was hanged on December 2nd, 1859 for treason. Reactions on the raid differed between the north and the south. The north called him a martyr; a person killed because of their beliefs. Southerners responded with their own raids. The south was convinced that the north was plotting a slave uprising everywhere.
“The Negro slaves of the south are the happiest, and, in some sense, the freest people in the world”(document 5). This quote is taken from a book written by George Fitzhugh. George Fitzhugh was a sociologist; The systematic study of human society, especially present-day societies. He believed that slaves were their happiest being slaves. He also believed that free labor workers in the north do little work and they use people. This document tells us what southerners thought and what they believed. We can also see how crazy these thoughts are.
There are plenty of more reasons and things that could 've led to the American Civil war. I don 't think the war could 've been avoided but it didn 't have to end in so many deaths. Over 1 million people died because people were stubborn and couldnt give. Over 1 million people died because people were so set in their own ways to

Show More
Related

How Did The Constitution Contribute To The Compromise Of 1850

692 Words | 3 Pages

Sanford. In this case Dred Scott a slave who had lived with his master in a free-state the returned to a slave-state felt he should be given his freedom. In this decision the Supreme Court decided that no slave or free black man could be granted U.S citizenship. This meant that no black man had the right to petition the court for their freedom. Chief Justice Roger Taney concluded “Congress possessed no authority to pass a law depriving persons of their slave property in the territories.

Read More

Dred Scott Case Research Paper

1459 Words | 6 Pages

"History inevitability", "Dred Scott Case" which is the immediate flashpoint of American Civil War, can be avoided? If you bring a case to the court today, you will get a fair trial, because equality has become a social consensus. However, what would happen if an American slave bought a case to the court for freedom-seek in slavery-legal period? In fact, he had no rights to get freedom for he was not regarded as an US citizen or even a human being. "Dred Scott Case" is not an occasional misunderstanding in that case pronounced by the United Supreme Judicial Court.

Read More

How Did Dred Scott Stand Up For Freedom

265 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever heard of Dred Scott?He was a brave african american , he sued his owner for his freedom in 1857.Dred Scott was an example to other slaves to stand up for their freedom. First of , Dred Scott 's early life . Born in Virginia in 1799 as a slave of the peter Bowl family . He was a slave because he was in a slave state . After Bows moved to St.Louis Dred was sold to Dr.John Emerson.

Read More

Dred Scott Vs. Sanford: Supreme Court Case

907 Words | 4 Pages

Because Taney was stating that Scott did not have citizenship due to his African heritage, he did not have a right to sue in a United States court of any kind. Therefore, the Circuit Court did not have jurisdiction over this case (Pearson Education Inc. 2008). Taney took his ruling one step further and decided that since slaves were considered property, they were protected under the Fifth Amendment. Property rights cannot be denied without due process (Independence Hall Association 2013). Taney argued that it was therefore unconstitutional for any state to make a law taking away another person's property, in this case their slaves.

Read More

Was John Brown A Terrorist Or A Freedom Fighter

326 Words | 2 Pages

He saw the wrong in owning slaves. He believed what he was doing and what he believed in was right not wrong. He was hung with the pleasure of knowing he made an impact on the world. John Brown tried very hard to do anything to please god and free slaves.

Read More

John Brown Dbq

648 Words | 3 Pages

Taylor, Matthaei Mr. Murray Social Studies April 22, 2024. John Brown, an Erring to Learn From On December 12, 1859, delinquent John Brown was hanged for his criminal acts. John Brown was a famous abolitionist in the mid-1800s who worked to make Kansas a free state. He passionately worked with his sons and other followers to abolish slavery by freeing and providing slaves defenses as well as punishing proslavers. John Brown worked hard to provide us with the slavery-free state we know and love today, but using his gruesome tactics.

Read More

John Brown Dbq

521 Words | 3 Pages

Then in 1855 he travels to Kansas disguised as a Free-Soiler with his sons and in May 24th, 1856 he ordered his men to brutally kill five proslavery believers. This event riled up the abolitionists and sent a message to the Southern states. According to document B “Last Meeting Between Frederick Douglass and John Brown” John Brown is a hero because he was willing to give his life in order to hijack the armory in Virginia and help the slaves revolt against slavery by using those weapons. For example it states, “He thought that the capture of Harper’s Ferry would serve as notice to the slaves that their friends had come, and as a trumpet to rally them.” “…Convinced me that he was going into a perfect steel-trap, and that once in he would never get out alive.”

Read More

John Brown Dbq

863 Words | 4 Pages

By the time he got to his 50's, he saw that slavery was not going to end peacefully. This led to an obsession with the idea of serving justice to black people and slaves. John Brown figured that the only way for it to end was for him to go and use force on white slave owners, which consisted of him killing them or hurting them and forcing them to give up their slaves. During this obsession with anti slavery, Brown planned a slave uprising at Harper's Ferry. John Brown started plotting to raid the town of Harper's Ferry and seize guns from the federal armory.

Read More

John Brown Dbq

784 Words | 4 Pages

Many people believed he was a hero, but many others believed he was a villain. John Brown murdered many innocent people, committed treason, and used violence. On May 24th, 1856, John Brown led an attack on a pro-slavery settlement at Pottawomie. He killed and tortured five

Read More

How Is John Brown Related To Modern Day Terrorists

480 Words | 2 Pages

John Brown was an ordinary man that committed sinful deeds and justified them with religion. John Brown’s actions at Pottawatomie Creek and Harper’s Ferry were not justified; his actions today would define him as a modern day terrorist. Terrorism is when one or more persons threaten others for various reasons. John Brown displayed terrorism in many ways. One way would be the innocent civilians he murdered to obtain what he wanted.

Read More

John Brown Dbq

824 Words | 4 Pages

“I never intended murder or treason, or the destruction of property[...] or to make insurrection,” were the words of John Brown in 1859 before being sentenced to death. John Brown was a well-known abolitionist hoping to end slavery in the 1800s, using techniques many would deem brutal. However, he also had many allies willing to help him in any way to achieve his goal. There have been many debates on whether the strong-willed man should be considered a hero for trying to end slavery, or a criminal for using violent methods. John Brown was a villain because he was untrustworthy, his supporters disapproved of his actions, and his measures to end slavery were incredibly violent.

Read More

John Brown Dbq

869 Words | 4 Pages

Lastly, we acknowledge the fact that he died to end slavery. John Brown raided Harpers Ferry, the home of the U.S. arsenal. His goal was to steal weapons from the arsenal to give to many slaves in hopes that they would revolt against their masters and other pro-slavery supporters. However, he and his followers were caught and later hanged for treason. With one speech at his trial and one letter sent after he was sentenced, John Brown didn’t try to escape or plead; he accepted his execution and died as a fierce martyr for all of the slaves and abolitionists (Documents F and G).

Read More

Could The Civil War Been Avoided Essay

459 Words | 2 Pages

Could the civil war have been avoided? Could there have been something different we could have done to avoid it? The civil war was a war between the north and the south of America. They both fight for what each side believe in. This war caused 600,000 people to die, but could it have been avoided.

Read More

Analyzing Justice Abe Fortas Justice Hugo Black

320 Words | 2 Pages

Cox v. Louisiana is his court case and the court case makes a valid point. Justice Black expresses concern that the courts making decisions versus the officials. He mentions this three times in his dissenting opinion, but does not support the idea with evidence nor does he provide ramifications for courts making decisions . Justice Hugo Black made his court case valid but he didn’t give enough support and evidence to back up the court case .

Read More

Supreme Court Case Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

Read More

More about Dred Scott Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document