ipl-logo

Dred Scott Case Research Paper

1459 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Argumentative american slavery topic

"History inevitability", "Dred Scott Case" which is the immediate flashpoint of American Civil War, can be avoided? If you bring a case to the court today, you will get a fair trial, because equality has become a social consensus. However, what would happen if an American slave bought a case to the court for freedom-seek in slavery-legal period? In fact, he had no rights to get freedom for he was not regarded as an US citizen or even a human being. "Dred Scott Case" is not an occasional misunderstanding in that case pronounced by the United Supreme Judicial Court. It is a historical inevitability leaded by many different factors. "Dred Scott Case" is one of the most controversial events in American history.
Dred Scott was an African American black slave born in 1795. He was taken by his master John Emerson, an army surgeon in the United States of America, from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and then to the free territory of Wisconsin. He lived there for a long period of time. When the Army ordered his master to go …show more content…

false historical facts to prove his black is not protected by the constitution of citizens of the United States point of view, he put "free blacks" and the black slave confused, set by the federal constitution before and after have a large number of free blacks have become states and in the United States, citizens enjoy certain civil rights and privileges of the fact to disregard, the use of evidence is limited with the laws and regulations of the black slaves and free blacks the right to, rather than a direct definition of Negro citizenship law. Therefore, the black Taney citizenship argument is untenable. In order to deny the power of Congress to restrict the slavery in the United States, he interpreted the "Federal Constitution" in a narrow sense. We can see the fallacy of Taney crystal clear from the Supreme Court justice Benjamin Curtis's

Show More
Related
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Eventually, the court ruled in favor of Sandford in which Taney wrote the majority opinion. Addressing Scott’s right as a citizen, Taney stated that because the country's founders thought of African Americans having “no rights which a white man was bound to respect” the concluded that Dred Scott did not have the right to sue in court as he was not considered a citizen under the U.S constitution. Also, the justice stated that although Scott had lived in a non-slave state, he could not be considered free as he said, “his status, as a free or slave, depended on the laws of Missouri.” Lastly, Justice Taney addressed the Missouri Compromise’s restriction of slavery throughout the country as unconstitutional as it did not follow the fifth amendment. Due to slaves being considered property, Congress could not ban slavery in the country.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1957, a black man named Dred Scott who at the time was living in Illinois and previously in free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had gone against the government and appealed to the Supreme Court hoping he would get the grant of freedom. Scott attempted to sue the the Missouri courts for his freedom, but ultimately failed in the end. He was claiming that his residence in a freed territory made him a free man, but the courts resided. Eventually, Scott brought this case to the Supreme Court which caused a big dispute between the people in America about the

Read More
1101 Words | 5 Pages

On June 26, 1857, Abraham Lincoln gave a speech on the Dred Scott decision, the Dred Scott is a decision on whether or not the negroes were considered part of the constitution or a “separate class of person”, in the end, they ruled that they were not part of it of the constitution and were considered a “separate class of person”. this got the attention of Abraham Lincoln the president of the united states of america. He gave a speech on how the dred scott decision that chief justice Taney, and the supreme court made was unconstitutional. he explains that the decision was unconstitutional and that the black in five out of the thirteen states that were check shows that black were given the right to vote and some were free negroes. This speech Abraham Lincoln gave spark an argument between the north and south on whether they should keep slavery.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

In 1857, an African American man named Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court. His owners brought him along on their trips across free states. Dred Scott failed in suing before his case was presented in the Supreme Court. Roger B. Taney was the fifth chief Justice of the United States when he wrote the Dred Scott vs Sandford decision. The Dred Scott vs Sandford case ended with the decision that African Americans, free and enslaved, had no rights and could not become citizens because they were property.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Many things led to the Civil war. One being slavery. The debate over the future of slavery had brought many trails and with the help of other disputes soon led to war. The Northern and Western states where fighting to purify the union. While the South fought to gain independence under its own constitution.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

The state attracted citizens from both the North and the South, causing the disagreements of the opposing sides to become more evident. By the year 1855, issues emerged when proslavery and antislavery settlers were competing in order to outnumber one another in votes. Two years later, divisions between the North and South grew even stronger when the Supreme Court took on the case of Dred Scott. Scott, who was an African American slave, sued for his freedom after his masters had traveled with him to a free state. The Court, ruled by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, came to the conclusion that Scott was not a free man because he was property and it would be unconstitutional to take the property of a citizen.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Dred Scott was born was a slave in the state of Virginia and was owned by Peter Blow, who died in 1832. Scott only had two masters after Blow’s death; one lived in Wisconsin and later Illinois, both of which prohibited slavery, yet, Scott didn’t petition for freedom. Instead he met his wife Harriet. The two met their new master in Louisiana, who did not grant them freedom, so Scott looked for legal action to escape his slavery. Over a period of seven years, he went through trial and retrial until he was denied his final freedom in 1854.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

Racism and discrimination have been and continue to cause injustices around the world. One example of this that seems to keep coming back is the Scottsboro Boys case. This case took place in the 1930’s, but continues to impact society even today. Nine young black men were falsely accused of raping on a freight train over a fight with a group of white men. The case of the Scottsboro Boys was an unfair case that greatly influenced the civil rights movement and the society we live in today.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

In the article Scottsboro Boys and “To Kill a Mockingbird”: Two Trials for the Classroom it stated that, “The lessons of the infamous 1930s Scottsboro Boys case in which two young white women wrongfully accused nine African American youths of rape illustrate through fact what Harper Lee tried to instruct through her fiction. ”This quote shows that black people were always accused from white people and the judge will always believe the white race. Also in the article “To Kill a Mockingbird”: Two Trials for the Classroom it stated that, “Both historical and fictional trials express the courage required to stand up for the Constitutional principle providing for equal justice to all under the law.” This quote shows that people should get equal rights to make them feel they are equal for

Read More
1657 Words | 7 Pages

Injustice The Scottsboro Case shed light on the racial practices expressed in law that made a great impact on the legal system today. The actual victims of the Case did not receive a fair trial due to the color of their skin. The ones who played the victims planned the crime, and their stories made no sense. But like many of the trials during the time it wasn’t based on the actual evidence that was found,or even the defendants ' stories.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

America alone carries its own flaws but leaders from all over the world came to give their two points and either helped or corrupted the nation. Foner’s insights play into the contemporary debate because he helps individuals understands everything behind what they monomers are and what they really represent. The monuments that are here in present day society show how it only helped to maintain the racial boundaries America has made through the Dred Scott decision. Dred scott was a man who had enough of being poorly treated and wanted to be set free. Even though he lost his case in the court many people stood by him and supported his ideas while others wanted the continuation of slavery.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott's was so controversial it went up to the Supreme Court. Many abolitionist believed that Dred would win and were astonished when he did not win. Abolitionist were outraged that Chief Justice Robert Taney ruled that African Americans had no rights and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. The decision made abolitionist furious the abolitionist wanted to continue their efforts to free slaves. According to Chief Justice Roger Taney of the Supreme Court on his decision on whether to allow African Americans able to be involved in politics, "They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, whether in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect" ( Document G ).

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

Racism played a part in the Scottsboro trials. In the case, nine black men were wrongly accused of raping two white women after stepping off of a train (Anderson). The trial was over the course of 18 years, but the but the boys were convicted on the first day. According to Schaefer, racism highlights the classic struggle between the rulers and the ruled. Often times racism occurs because certain people push others from an opposite race down to gain higher status.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave who attempted to gain his freedom. Scott was owned by a man for the early part of his life, and then was sold to a new man once his original owner died (Tindall 672). He followed his new owner around the country, and lived in several free states (Tindall 672). Once his second owner died, Scott filed for his freedom (Tindall 672). After going through a rigorous process, the court finally decided that Scott had no grounds for his case because he was not actually a citizen (Tindall 672).

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

Assuming all men are created equal like Jefferson said, then slaves should have never existed. Mr. Finch adds “ a jury is only as strong as the men that make it up.” Granted the men that make it up do not believe two men of different races are equal. Tom should be given a fair trail with an unbias jury. Assuming a white male was being accused of raping a black female, the case would have been dismissed as the female lying.

Read More

More about Dred Scott Case Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document