ipl-logo

Missouri Compromise That Led To The Civil War

824 Words4 Pages

Prior to the Civil War, multiple compromises were made to try to keep civility. The problems that led to the Civil War and increased sectionalism were the Missouri Compromise, The Kansas-Nebraska Act, The Compromise of 1850, and The Caning of Senator Sumner. These compromises and acts had problems with them because they had too many flaws.
Before the Missouri Compromise was written in 1820, complications began to rise between the North and South. In 1819, Missouri wanted to join the union as a free state. This upset the Confederacy because it set off the balance between the free and slave states. In order to keep behaviors civil, Congress made a two-part compromise, which allowed Missouri to join as a free state, but Maine also got added in as a free state. The United States had 22 states at the …show more content…

Douglas in 1854, was a bill that allowed people of a territory to choose if slavery was apart of their state or not. The bill was a part of sectionalism and the building of a railroad. It split the two major political parties and it helped create a new one. It also made the relationship between the North and South worse. Douglas wanted to build a railroad route to benefit Illinois, which led him to put together a bill that made Nebraska a more organized place and bring it under civil control. The southern senators disapproved of this idea since the region laid north of the 36°30′ line and the Missouri Compromise stated that it would become a free state. Since Douglas wanted to support, he decided creating two territories would be the best thing, so he added in a new territory, Kansas. He felt that the people would decide whether or not Kansas was a free or slave state. This led to Bleeding Kansas, a time of violence during the settling of Kansas. John Brown led the anti-slavery fighters. “Rival governments had been established in Kansas by late 1855, one backed by proslavery Missourians, the other by antislavery

Open Document