ipl-logo

Political Compromise Between 1820 And 1860 Essay

713 Words3 Pages

As young nations slowly progress to their full potential, many obstacles riddle their ways. For the United States, the Constitution was the word of law, written by demigods who could possibly do no wrong. Until of course, the question of archaic versus modern morality rises. Such was the problem in between the troubled years of 1820 and 1860. Rapid polarization on the institution of slavery between the North and the South, as well as the magnitude of importance of the ideologies of secession and slavery led to political compromise being increasingly difficult. The Northern abhorrence of slavery coupled with the hierarchical sectionalism of the South hindered any political compromise between the regions. As many Northerners didn’t require slaves …show more content…

Before the full sectionalized emotions came out to the public, the government attempted to just push back the conflict of slavery. This is seen in the balance of slave and free states as well as in the Resolution of the Pinckney Committee. The House of Representatives decided to have “no further action…to the subject of slavery…” would be the best policy to follow (DOC 3). Unfortunately, this would just increase tensions for someone else to deal with. As the middle of the century approached, the Southern states became wearier of the growing Republican and abolitionist power. The Senator Daniel Webster, a known advocate of compromise pleaded for a solution. Of course, Webster had his own ambitions since he was a key supporter of the Compromise of 1850, he’s still necessary to understand (DOC 4). Doing nothing just let the political compromise be even more unlikely. And, of course there was the demand of an answer to slavery itself. President Abraham Lincoln discussed the prominence of slavery issue and how it encapsulated all life at the time. Of course, Lincoln personally disliked slavery and wanted it to be gone, it was the lack of quick compromise and a new wave of radicalized abolitionists from the Dred Scott case that obstructed his way. (DOC 7) Soon the country would dive into a war with the most American casualties ever, something that could’ve been

Show More
Related

The Missouri Compromise And The Dred Scott Case Decision

551 Words | 3 Pages

The Union not able to come up with a practical agreement to settle the moral dilemma of slavery. Each side was so set in their way of thinking that they were unwilling to recognize the “other point of view”. A silent era concerning slavery was going out of date and the tensions rose with expansion westward. As a time of silence concerning slavery was ending, tensions were skyrocketing.

Read More

Compromise Of 1877 Dbq Essay

1458 Words | 6 Pages

The Compromise of 1877 was an unwritten deal that settled the intensely disputed 1876 election. It resulted with the United States pulling the last of the troops from the south, ending the Reconstruction Era and giving the south power over their land. Both Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel J. Tilden had great political talent, but of course, they saw being president as something else in their own eye. With Hayes coming from the North and Tilden coming from the South, their goals were going to be pretty different. The Civil War ended not too many years before hand, so the election was going to be very rough.

Read More

Compromises In Bleeding Kansas

242 Words | 1 Pages

Prior to the events of Bleeding Kansas that begun in 1854, the United States followed a strict policy of compromise in regards to it’s political decisions. Being a relatively newly founded country a great deal of care was given towards pleasing the citizens of the United States, through compromise, in order to maintain a stable society. This is specifically evident in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Compromise of 1850. These events helped to maintain the stability of American society for a time. However, as the nation developed further there became apparent divides on many matters, but mainly over slavery.

Read More

Compromise Of 1877 Dbq Essay

585 Words | 3 Pages

The Revolution of the Compromise of 1877 The election of 1877 between Rutherford Hayes and Samuel Tilden led to both political parties to have the Compromise of 1877 and finish the end of reconstruction. In that year election both Democrat and Republican where fighting over the territories and who will become president. That fighting led the election results in an inconclusive results because of the disagreement between Democrats and Republicans. The states were undecided and this led to tension and issues among the election candidates.

Read More

Lincoln Racist Dbq

867 Words | 4 Pages

You can see this in Document B, wherein 1858 Lincoln says this: “I have no purpose . . . to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists . . .” Later on in the same document he also states, “There is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights . . . in the Declaration of Independence- the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” While Lincoln was running for president, he promised to leave slavery alone in the South, but he also stays true to his personal morals through his time, that slavery

Read More

How Did Abraham Lincoln Deserve The Name Of The Great Emancipator

997 Words | 4 Pages

When Lincoln ran for office in 1860, he did not have the intention of ending slavery. However, during the years of the war, he uses it to his advantage so that he can defeat the Confederacy and to win favors of the

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

742 Words | 3 Pages

In the early 1860’s the Southern states seceded from the Union due to the uproar of disputes over, slavery in the territories, the Northern abolitionists growth in power and the

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Framers

1364 Words | 6 Pages

The North should have been more aggressive when it came to the South in regards to slavery”. Another reason why the they shouldn’t done the compromises was because in Article IV, Section 2. This is the fugitive-slave clause which reads:“No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom Service or Labour may be due”. This clause explains that no person held in service (which implied slavery) or labor in one state, and under that state’s laws, can escape into another state and be relieved of his services. Even if a slave escapes to a free state with laws prohibiting slavery, he still must be returned to his rightful owner to whom he owes his services in the slave state.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Political Compromise Between 1850 And 1860

773 Words | 4 Pages

In the early 1800’s, and before, the United States prided itself on its ability to discuss political issues and express opinions without violence. However, around the 1850’s and 1860’s, emotions were escalating, and political compromise was thrown out the window. This was because the major political debate at the time was slavery, an issue that throughout America’s entire history was shown to create very strong opinions. Another reason for this change is that northerners and southerners were unwilling to communicate with each other in any meaningful way. Slavery was an issue for the United States since it before it even became a country, and if the Three Fifths Compromise had not been made, America may never have become independent.

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

Clay wanted to keep the nation together. Henry Clay, a Senator, was someone who wanted to keep the nation together, so he gave a speech to the Senate in 1833 about how South Carolina cannot secede and become an independent state, and doesn't want to. “I say it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state” (Doc A). For the people that were against slavery, they held anti-slavery conventions, talking about how awful slavery is and even called slave

Read More

The Founding Brothers The Revolutionary Generation Sparknotes

1376 Words | 6 Pages

This divide in the government made it hard for the states to work together, and “the inability to take decisive action against slavery in the decades immediately following the Revolution permitted the size of the enslaved population to grow… eventually over 600,000 Americans would die… to resolve the crisis” (88). Had the Northerners spoken up for what they knew was right, the nation might have been able to civilly reach an agreement. However, since the Northerns chose silence, but did not conform to Southern ways, bitterness developed between the two sides, and years later the Civil War

Read More

Research Paper On The First Battle Of Bull Run

1467 Words | 6 Pages

The federal government was trying to tell states to get rid of slavery without knowing if they could legally even tell them that. One of these disputes was caused by the Dred Scott Decision in 1834 (www.history.com 1of 2). Dred Scott was a slave that

Read More

Civil War Dbq

734 Words | 3 Pages

The North and South obviously had very different ideas of what was or was not constitutional. The South was so firm in their stance that slavery needed to continue to be instituted that they decided to secede from the Union. This action shows just how upset the South was because this is something that comes with great risks. They knew that the North was also firm in their belief that slavery was immoral and would do whatever it took to abolish it. However, the North also wanted the country to be a united front again.

Read More

State's Rights Issue In 1860

1081 Words | 5 Pages

In 1860, the Southern slave states elected to secede from the United States of America and form the Confederate States of America. The issues that resulted in the secession of the south included disagreements over tariffs and state rights, but the greatest issue was over slavery, which was legal and a large part of culture and economy in the South but had been slowly prohibited by states in the North. As the United States expanded into the West with new territories, fierce debates started over whether or not slavery would be legal in those expanded territories. People in the South feared that not allowing slavery in these new states would eventually cause slavery to be outlawed in all of America. Southerners were also bitter about how Southern

Read More

Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

707 Words | 3 Pages

However, these differences show that the North and South were actually two distinct countries held together by one constitution. The North felt that decisions regarding slavery and its legality were entrenched in the central government while the South felt that such decision belonged to the individual states. In the times preceding the war, both sides could not reach a compromise. Bonner mentions, “Because secession and war were permitted to come, warned Russel, "We are not entitled to lay the flattering unction to our souls that the Civil War was an inevitable conflict (Bonner, 195).” Hence, these differences could only be addressed through war.

Read More

More about Political Compromise Between 1820 And 1860 Essay

Related Topics

Open Document