ipl-logo

Compromise Of 1850 Compromises Essay

870 Words4 Pages

In the early nineteenth century, series of compromises had been made in order to keep the states unified rather than divided. The overall reason for the sectionalism in the nation had all started from slavery. Compromises passed by Congress were used to keep the nation unified hoping to resolve the political disputes by trying to appeal to the South, by feeding into their “need” of slaves. However, political disputes could no longer be resolved by compromise due to different social views, lack of government interference, and the belief over whether the north or the south is more superior. Therefore, from 1820-1860, compromises could no longer help solve political disputes. In the nineteenth century, slavery played the biggest role on why …show more content…

There were treaties created to find peace within the nation, but it wasn’t much help. Compromises such as the Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850 had been “flops” because of instead of government taking the authority; they give into the peoples wants. The purpose of these compromises were to end the dispute over slavery by trying to make half the states free and the other have slave states (Missouri Compromise), or to have people return slave states and have new admitted states choose where they wanted to be slave or a frees state (Compromise of 1850). A common factor that they both share is that Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850 had been created by Henry Clay, who had said “I believe it is utterly impracticable, whatever course of legislation she may choose to adopt, for her to succeed (Doc A).” In Document E, a cartoon of Preston Brooks caning Charles Sumner is being shown. The purpose of this picture is to show that other government officials (in the back) had found entertainment in the violence rather than do something to stop it, which means that they’re not willing to interfere in something like that, what more a more serious situation. Also, it shows that the north and south can no longer be civil with one another since violence was resulted

Open Document