ipl-logo

Essay On The Great Compromise

298 Words2 Pages

The Great Compromise which was founded at the Constitutional Convention wasn't formed without trouble. Many of the delegates that participated in the convention were wealthy landowners and lawyers, who owned many slaves. They failed to notice the diversity that excited within the nation. As they talked how to repair the Articles of Confederation, issues would arise that would create continuous debates amongst each other. One of the issues that would arise would be the nature of the new government. The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states.”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.”(add footnote) …show more content…

After the countless debates, the Great Compromise was what the convention would come into agreement with representation by population in the House of Representatives “The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative.”(add footnote) The smaller states were pleased with equal representation in the Senate “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senates from each state and each Senator shall have one vote.”(add

Show More
Related
309 Words | 2 Pages

In 1978, two plans were put forth regarding how each state in the union would be represented in the national legislature. The two plans put forth were the, “Virginia Plan” (which favored big states), and the “New Jersey Plan.” (which favored small states) Edmund Randolph of Virginia proposed the Virginia plan. The plan laid out a system in which states would be represented in the national legislature based on their population and/or by how much revenue they contributed to the national government.

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

As the Constitutional Congress were creating America’s new government from scratch, a problem came into their hands. They couldn’t decide whether to have equal representation or representation proportional (corresponding in size) to each state's’ population. Each of them either favored smaller or bigger states. Such as the Virginia Plan, this plan favored big states because it stated that the bigger the population, the more representatives they get. On the other hand, the New Jersey plan favored smaller states because it stated that no matter how big or small the population is, they get an equal amount of representatives.

Read More
54 Words | 1 Pages

all states were represented equally in the Senate. This made the smaller states happy. In the House of Representatives, representation was based on population. This pleased the bigger states. The Great Compromise settled the method of representation in the legislative branch.

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

The bigger states thought equal representation would be unfair because they wouldn’t be able to represent as many people that lived in the state. 2. The Virginia Plan suggested a strong national government. It said that two governments would go into affect, individual state governments and the national governments. We call this a federal system.

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

Roger Sherman proposed the Connecticut Plan as a compromise to the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. This plan is also known as the Great Compromise. As a result of this plan, the legislature would be bicameral with the lower house (the House) based off of population proportional and the upper house (the Senate) equally represented with two delegates for each state. Slaves would count as 3/5th of a person for population reasons. The house had the power to create legislation that would affect the budget of the nation.

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The Virginia plan presented in 1787 by Edmund Randolph was one option on how the United States should be governed. Their key points were for Congress to have 2 houses and for representation to be based on population. Another option was the New Jersey plan which was presented by William Paterson in the same year. This was to oppose the Virginia plan because not everyone agreed with what was written.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

The plan laid out a system by which the members of the House of Representatives were elected in proportion to the number of people in the state they represented, and the members of the Senate were equally distributed, regardless of the state. Although many of the details surrounding this system were debated at length, the core elements were eventually accepted into a structure we still use to this

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

The discussion of federalism and how power should be separated among state and of the nation government was a key question under discussion during the of general laws of government Convention 1 of 1787 that was got answer to by the Great middle way, but the discussion would last on throughout the most near years after the of general laws of government Convention 1 as people fought to have the of the nation government either stronger or feebler. Back in 1787, the leaders of the american group united by agreement were uncertain how to make a new government heading into the of general laws of government Convention 1. People were unhappy with a too powerful of the nation government, as the people have to amount with a man who have taken power by

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Finally, the Small State-Large State Compromise is a framer of the constitution that helps guard against tyranny. “Representatives shall be appointed according to the population.” “The Senate of the the United States shall be composed to two senators from each state.” (Constitution of the United States of America, 1787) (Doc D) Each state had equal representation, yet the larger states had the representation the amount of people living in the state.

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

At the Constitutional Convention in 1787 differences between the delegates and the interests they represented made compromise absolutely necessary. The Great Compromise was made because small states felt there wasn’t enough representation for them in Congress. The Three-Fifths Compromise was established to solve the problem of slavery representation in Southern states. Delegates at the Constitutional Convention had to face the problem of giving fair representation to both small and large states.

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

The Virginia Plan was the new form of government to have different numbers of voters in each state received in Congress base on the population. This was to protect the big states who were interested in the new government. The supporters of this plan included George Washington,

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitutional compromise between the small and large states is also known as the Connecticut Compromise of 1787. When the Constitution was written it allocated the government to have two separate legislative branches, the House of Representatives and the Senate. However, the Constitution did not write exactly how these two branches of government would be elected. In fact, they put the election part of the two branches of government in the hands of the states. Unfortunately, this began a bigger issue than I believe our forefathers realized, because every state varied in how they elected their government officials.

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

After no progress of which plan to go through with, Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise. The compromise called for two house legislator. Members of the house of representatives or the lower house would be elected by popular vote. Members of the Senate or the upper house would be chosen by the state legislators. Each state would only have two senators no matter the size, or population of the state.

Read More
1895 Words | 8 Pages

“It was observed, that as the pill would be a bitter one to the Southern States, something should be done to soothe them,” said Thomas Jefferson in a letter to George Washington when referring to the Compromise of 1790. The pill he referred to was assumption, and the just measure was moving the capital to the Potomac River in between Virginia and Maryland. The Compromise of 1790 had political conflict in the issues of assumption and residence. It had compromise in the deal between Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, leading to the passing of both the Assumption Bill and the Residence Act. The Compromise of 1790 was a vital compromise between Hamilton, Madison, and Jefferson that resolved serious voting conflicts in Congress, thus stabilizing early political government.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

In the Constitutional Convention, delegates of the smaller states feared being deprived of influence in the newly formed government, resulting in a demand for equal representation in Congress. Meanwhile, representatives of the bigger states argued against them, claiming that representation should be based on population, which created conflict on representation among the commissaries. As a result, “The Great Compromise” was formed. Thus, small states received equal representation in Congress (the Senate) and larger states received representation based on population (the

Read More

More about Essay On The Great Compromise

Open Document