Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The great compromise pros and cons
Essay on the great compromise
The great compromise pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The great compromise pros and cons
Essay on the great compromise
The great compromise pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As the Constitutional Congress were creating America’s new government from scratch, a problem came into their hands. They couldn’t decide whether to have equal representation or representation proportional (corresponding in size) to each state's’ population. Each of them either favored smaller or bigger states. Such as the Virginia Plan, this plan favored big states because it stated that the bigger the population, the more representatives they get. On the other hand, the New Jersey plan favored smaller states because it stated that no matter how big or small the population is, they get an equal amount of representatives.
the small and big states. This compromise was known as “The Great Compromise.” The terms of the compromise was that there would be two chambers of congress, with different forms of representation. In the House of representatives, representation would be dependent of the population of each state. In the Senate, representation would be equal between all states.
The upper house would be elected by the lower house, thus ensuring that there is always at least one representative in the upper house. The New Jersey Plan preserved an existing unicameral legislature, in which each state would have equal representation. The compromise that was made called for a bicameral legislature, like the 1 Virginia Plan. However, the lower house number of representatives was determined by the size of the state, and the upper house each state had equal representation. This was just part of the Great Compromise, the subject of slavery had divided the Northern and the Southern states.
Once the House of Representatives passes the charge, it then goes to the Senate, where it takes after the same procedure of updates. The senate president allots the bill to a board of trustees, where it experiences the same three readings that it experienced in the House of Representatives. At the end of the day, the bill must get most of the houses vote to be passed. The bill must be gone in indistinguishable structure from both houses with the goal it should be gone on to the president.
The Great Compromise was Roger Sherman’s plan, and was an attempt to resolve the conflicts between the smaller states and larger states, settling the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a bicameral
Finally, the Small State-Large State Compromise is a framer of the constitution that helps guard against tyranny. “Representatives shall be appointed according to the population.” “The Senate of the the United States shall be composed to two senators from each state.” (Constitution of the United States of America, 1787) (Doc D) Each state had equal representation, yet the larger states had the representation the amount of people living in the state.
After the countless debates, the Great Compromise was what the convention would come into agreement with representation by population in the House of Representatives “The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative. ”(add footnote) The smaller states were pleased with equal representation in the Senate “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senates from each state and each Senator shall have one vote.”(add
Furthermore, the Great Compromise was latter decided in which based their elements in the importance of separation of powers in which the people were represented by the House of Representatives while the state legislatures
There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.
After no progress of which plan to go through with, Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise. The compromise called for two house legislator. Members of the house of representatives or the lower house would be elected by popular vote. Members of the Senate or the upper house would be chosen by the state legislators. Each state would only have two senators no matter the size, or population of the state.
In effect of the compromise, the South was guaranteed more representation in the House of Representatives. As the agreement was in the process of being passed, many conflicts arose, but soon after, there was a clause brought to the table for the North and South’s best interest. The three fifths compromise was a controversial topic during the late 1700s, and was eventually passed, giving southern states greater representation in the House of Representatives and the national government as a whole. In the year of 1787, the Three-Fifth’s Compromise was proposed by James Wilson of Pennsylvania (Laws, 1). With this suggestion, the South was guaranteed more votes in the House of Representatives.
The most important compromise was the aptly named Great compromise, in which the legislative branch was split into two houses, one with representatives apportioned by population, and one in which each state is granted two, regardless of their size. Summarize the 7 articles of the Constitution The first article defines congress and its two houses and establishes their responsibilities, powers, and procedures. It also lays out the necessary qualifications of senators and representatives, and how they
The congress was divided into two parts: the senate and the House of Representatives. When the Articles of Confederation was in action, equal representation did not exist, meaning that the amount of representatives that each house had was based on the states population. This meant that bigger states had more of a voice in making decisions, and that wasn’t fair for the smaller ones. In order to avoid this, the constitution decided that “the number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative” (Doc D). Also, the Senate was composed by two senators from each state, each one having only one vote.
This compromise helped give each state equal say in the government. As John Samples said to the Cato Institute in In Defense of the Electoral College, “ … the Electoral College makes sure that the states count in presidential elections… an important part of our federalist system - a system worth preserving… federalism is central to our grand constitutional effort to restrain power.” (Doc C). Since this nation is founded on federalism (the sharing of power between national and state governments), it only makes sense that each individual state would want equal say in the nation’s government. Samples knew that to keep the government running smoothly, each state needed equal representation in the government, thus the Electoral College.
This helped guard against tyranny because when this compromise happened, both big and small states had equal representation in the Senate equally, (Both big and small states had 2 representatives). In the House, a bigger state will have more representatives. (Doc D). This helps guard against tyranny because since both big and small states have equal representation, none of the states can become tyrants.