Compare And Contrast Virginia Plan Vs Small States
The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan had many similarities and distinct differences. The New Jersey Plan wanted the Legislative Branch to consist of one house with equal representation from all states. It also stated that the Legislative Branch could collect taxes from the states. The Virginia Plan included details about a powerful Legislative Branch. There would be two houses with membership proportional to the state’s population.
How would you like it if you and a group worked really hard on a project and thought it was perfect just the way it was. Then some people come around and decide it's not good enough so they try and change it or just make a completely new one .Well that's what happen with the articles confederation. Rufus king or the delegate of massachusetts thought it they were all good and didn't want to make any changes. He was one of the youngest delegates at the age of thirty three.
"The Virginia Plan" (May 1787), authored by James Madison and Edmund Randolph, contained several proposals that represented objections for some individuals who ultimately refused to sign the Constitution. These objections centered around concerns over the proposed structure of government and the balance of power between the states and the central government. One proposal in the Virginia Plan that raised objections was the establishment of a bicameral legislature with representation based on population. This provision would have given larger states, with higher populations, more influence and power in the legislative branch. Smaller states, fearing their interests would be overshadowed by larger states, objected to this representation model,
Small states wanted equal representation, and large states wanted representation based on
I believe that the Virginia plan is much wiser than the New Jersey plan because it was proportional, or corresponding in size, to the population in state. The best plan is this one because it has two legislative houses (Bicameral), the Senate and the House of Representatives. We each get to vote for the representatives we want. The New Jersey plan only has one Legislative house (unicameral) and it only gets one vote for each state this is what deprived the smaller states from equality. The New Jersey Plan had so many disagreements that it had to appoint a “grand committee” and then it was known as the Great Compromise (An agreement between two or more sides in which each side gives up what some of what it wants).
In an attempt to address concerns dealing with representation of the states in Congress, delegates chosen from the states: Massachusetts, New York, Maryland, Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Connecticut, and Georgia met in Philadelphia on July 16, 1787 in a meeting called, The Constitutional Convention. Among these delegates was Roger Sherman of Connecticut. Sherman was seen as awkward and unmeaning, giving off the air of a sub-conscious farmer when seated quietly. Although Sherman’s posture and physical appearance was not up to par of other politicians, and gave insight on his background as a Yeoman farmer, his superior intelligence was often recognized and spoken about on a grand level by those
Virginia Plan was created by James Madison but presented to the Constitutional Convention by Edmund Randolph, Governor of Virginia in the year of 1787. The Virginia Plan was about a new form of government and called for the number of votes each state would receive would be based on the population instead of each state receiving just one vote. James Madison and other 56 delegates met in Philadelphia in May 1787, they wanted to make amendments in the Articles of Confederation. They were successful and managed to create a new constitution and as James Madison was representing Virginia, he had become the chief recorder of information. Virginia Plan served as that basis for debate in the development of the U.S. Constitution.
In the creating of the US Constitution, the creators hit many roadblocks. It was difficult for the state delegates to decide on much, especially because they were biased and in favor of their own states. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two examples of the disagreement of representation within the states in the legislative branch. The New Jersey Plan was in favor of equal representation throughout the states. The Virginia Plan was in favor of population representation, meaning the larger states would have more representation than the smaller states.
“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.
The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.
Progressive distribution of revenues for property tax relief is even more essential because the budget framework raises all the revenue for such relief from Pennsylvania’s most regressive tax, the sales tax. Without a renter rebate, many families earning less than $50,000 per year could pay several hundred dollars in additional sales tax but get none of the tax relief. Similarly, if large portions of property tax relief go to businesses and to upper-income homeowners, moderate-income homeowners and neighborhoods could pay more in additional sales tax than they get back in property tax relief. Analysis of the original Wolf and House property tax relief proposals makes clear that many constituents in Republican-represented districts, including a majority in lower-income rural areas, would benefit from a more progressive distribution of property tax relief that includes a renter rebate. So, unless playing reverse Robin Hood has more appeal to some lawmakers than representing their constituents, getting the distribution of property tax relief right should be an easy bipartisan
Claim A: Under the Virginia Plan, the population would determine representation in each of the two houses of Congress. Claim B: Delegates from less-populous states wanted to amend the Articles of Confederation to protect their equal standing, which would preserve each
Obviously, smaller states were not pleased with that plan. They thought that larger states could easily overrule them in congress. So William Paterson created a plan called the New Jersey Plan. It as well had the same three branches but, the plan provided legislators to have only one house. Each state would only one vote in the legislator, regardless of the population.
In England, many of the English settlers decided to move west in search of their own colony. Two men; William Penn and John Smith traveled into two colonies called Pennsylvania and Virginia. Since they both settled into their own colony, they each contained their own, separate issues. Religion was a major part of every colony but differed greatly in these two colonies. Virginia, the first colony established, followed the religious ways of England, meaning that the colonists all worshipped the same way.
During this time, delegates from particularly larger states, such as Virgin with a population of ____ during the ____, though it unjust for each state to have equal amount of votes, and thought that the votes should be divided based upon population size, having more populated states more represented. Thus, resolving less populous states with less say (fraser). In objection, smaller states, such as New Jersey with a population size of _____ during _______, believed that they joined the convention to have an equal contribution (fraser). Although Pennsylvania originally had a population of ___, it soon became one of the most thriving colonies (fraser). Because of the exponential growth of population from the influx of immigrants, political policies and standing points have consistently changed with the growing populous.
More about Compare And Contrast Virginia Plan Vs Small States
Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan
203 Words | 1 PagesPros And Cons Of The Virginia Plan
550 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of The Virginia Plan
336 Words | 2 PagesThe House Of Representatives: The Great Compromise
54 Words | 1 PagesCompare And Contrast The Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan
370 Words | 2 PagesRoger Sherman Dbq Analysis
1680 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast The Virginia Plan And The Constitution
121 Words | 1 PagesVirginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan Essay
537 Words | 3 PagesTyranny Dbq
463 Words | 2 PagesEssay On The Great Compromise
298 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Pennsylvania State Budget
712 Words | 3 PagesThe Articles Of Confederation Lead To The Abolition Of The Slave Trade Dbq
398 Words | 2 PagesThe Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention
1593 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast Pennsylvania And Virginia
947 Words | 4 PagesRepresentation In America Persuasive Speech
630 Words | 3 Pages