ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Virginia Plan

550 Words3 Pages

How would you like it if you and a group worked really hard on a project and thought it was perfect just the way it was.Then some people come around and decide it's not good enough so they try and change it or just make a completely new one .Well that's what happen with the articles confederation. Rufus king or the delegate of massachusetts thought it they were all good and didn't want to make any changes.He was one of the youngest delegates at the age of thirty three.He would speak very eloquently or very powerful about not changing the articles.Rufus attended every single meeting, sometimes he could be very rude or abrupt.He also had a talent at exposing others weak spots.rufus believed that slave should not be a part of this population and they should be looked on as people or be taxed(“Delegate Guidebook”). …show more content…

"VIRGINIA PLAN vs. NEW JERSEY PLAN." VIRGINIA PLAN vs. NEW JERSEY PLAN (n.d.): n. pag. VIRGINIA PLAN vs. NEW JERSEY PLAN. Web.).he chose this because he believed poverty would be a good way to determine how many representatives a state had.King did not believe each state should get the same amount of votes(“delegate Guidebook”) . Massachusetts had a population of 378,787 at the time of 1790. Rufus believed that slaves should be looked on as property.He believed this because If the slaves were represented it wouldn't be fair to the other states that don't have slaves.(“delagate guidebook”).The delagate from massachusetts was a federlist and he always spoke in defence of a stong federlist government (“Encyclopedia.com”). King believed there should be two houses. He wanted the people to choose the second house. He said the people should choose the first house. Then the first house should choose the second house. He wanted them to serve two years and they could run again( delegate

Open Document