Connotation In Frankenstein

948 Words4 Pages

The word “monster” has been around for many centuries and although the interpretation of the word has evolved it still goes back to fundamentally being a mysterious creature that is grotesque that ends up striking fear into others because of their devilish intentions. In this essay I will argue as to what it truly means to be a monster. It is agreed by most that a monster is a type of mysterious large creature, with some sort of negative connotation. This negative connotation can be physical appearance, personality, or intent. Technically, a monster should only be something spoken of in fairytales or legends; a mythical creature that resembles something of a mix between a human and an animal. But as we further study the transformation of the word “monster” we realize that not all monsters belong in fairytales and legends.
In …show more content…

A murderer overrides natural laws and takes on an animalistic mindset, killing for a number reasons. Some of these reasons include revenge, ambition, anger, or sometimes even just to kill. But if a shark were to be shown a wounded or weak animal, and they would not hesitate to finish the kill. But what differentiates a person from a shark in the sense of being a monstrous individual? Human beings are different from other animals because of our ability to feel, to follow a set of morals that we decide for ourselves. It is because in the human world, there are a set of morals generally accepted by a society, and not killing people is definitely at the top of most lists in modern times. So, although kidnappers, bombers, and murderers do not have the body of a large animal, razor sharp teeth, and claws, they still have an animal side, hiding on under the surface, but nonetheless their evil intensions qualify them as being a