Controversies between policymakers and education research are credibility, quality, bias and unclear data. Meanwhile, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Education Science Reform (ESR) acts transformed American Education with laws; high stakes testing and reporting systems such as, Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) and Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT). Conversely, Science based researches and evidenced based practices continue to overwhelm the educational system policies on what is effective or ineffective. “Multiple accountability systems have left the general public confused about the quality of their local schools” (Borko, Liston, & Whitcomp 2007, p. 99). Extensive studies recommend: principle soundness of academic publication requires policy reform; teacher educators must engage in dialogue about NCLB and ESR influence on K-12 classroom repetition, teacher life, education effort and quality to make education stronger as legislators aim to strengthen bonds between research & policy makers by improving doctoral programs, raising standards, credible research, including establishing a store house of trustworthy works and organizing research that is vetted practical.
This essay purposes to combine three articles into argumentative formation on claimed fiascoes within the American Education system, When Education Research Matters, Hess (2008), NCLB
…show more content…
Although special interest groups may have influence, policy makers should devise regulations to restrain such inspirations. My initial reaction reflected on education research policies and its effectiveness. No doubt, society has evolved into techno-savvy buffs whereas questioning legitimacy of “evidence-based” or “scientifically based” prior to implementation is