ipl-logo

Convicted People Without Evidence

512 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Wrongful conviction

In the court of law a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, you cannot convict someone without the proper evidence and a court to back up the evidence against the person being accused. In a court a judge or jury will decide whether the person should be convicted innocent or guilty based on the evidence. If proven guilty they can be sentenced to jail, life sentence, or in a serious case sentenced to death. Everyone has their rights and they cannot be violated without the proper evidence to be convicted. I am all forward with this statement, it would be horrid if they convicted people based on appearance, and accusations rather than based on evidence!
For this reason it is a crime to put an innocent person to death. It is the same as murdering someone for no reason. The person gets tried for it but the court does not. They can just say it was a mistake and get away with it as if it wasn 't wrong. They are so eager to put someone in jail. They do not care if they are innocent or guilty.
Therefore someone is innocent until proven guilty because if there is no evidence to support a claim or accusation. Without evidence there is no way of knowing if it 's a true accusation . You can not go …show more content…

Also it would not be the best feeling to know you could die or be incarcerated for something that was a false accusation. If there is no evidence proving that you are guilty how can you be guilty? It has to be the right evidence proving and showing what was going on. Or at least have an alibi so you will not be convicted guilty if it truly is a mistake. Innocent until proven guilty is one of the best things america has ever came up with, and it is super helpful in life. It hold a fair trial that can not be led on to something the judge believes because it would be unfair and would have to have a

Show More
Related
755 Words | 4 Pages

I assume people figured since they were already convicted, they didn't care enough to educate themselves on the legal system and the unfairness of it. If the law were applied equally,I believe there would be a lot less discrimination,prejudice,and unjust findings. Additionally,the training of law enforcement officers with regards to constitutional law would decrease discrimination,unconstitutional arrests and compensatory lawsuits. It would also lead to fewer citizens having their civil rights violated. If students in school were educated about their guaranteed constitutional rights given to them by the founders of this country, we would be a stronger nation, a more free people, and a happier society.

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever been accused of something you didn 't do? Stealing something, not doing your homework, etc... Well there are people all over America that have been accused of stealing, killing or other crimes that they did not commit, and they were severely punished for it. People like Claude Jones, Cameron Todd Willingham, and Larry Griffin, were all falsely accused and punished for a crime someone else committed. Some were even put away because there was false evidence provided.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

When a person has been charged with a crime, it's after the police have conducted an investigation. There are many times when the investigation has caused the police to arrest the wrong individual. The accused has the right to have their own investigation conducted by professional detectives working for the defense. Defense attorneys can have their own in-house criminal defense investigator to find facts and evidence that will proclaim their clients' innocence. (-- removed HTML --) Associate Degree Criminal Justice (-- removed HTML --)

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

Guilty Until Proven Innocent Today’s justice system claims that, you are innocent until proven guilty, yet they confine the so called guilty person until they can prove their innocents. On Native American reservation tribal courts don't have jurisdiction to prosecute non-tribal personnel for crimes committed like sexual assault and rape that occurs on the reservations. The tribal criminal justice systems have limited resources, little to no back from the local law enforcement and almost no funding from the federal government to help improve on these problems. Louise Erdrich shows this through Bazil, a tribal judge and how the legal system fails his family.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

With a jury that cares about everything but the trial, how is the defendant suppose to be given a fair trial? He isn’t. The last piece of evidence is cartoon 3, where a dog is being judged by his natural enemies, feline (Document E). These ‘jurors’ all hate the dog and no matter what the evidence is, the dog will be guilty. It applies to our system with the notion that a suspect is hated by jurors because the media accuses them of being guilty before the trial begins.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

With millions of criminal convictions a year, more than two million people may end up behind bars(Gross). According to Samuel Gross reporter for The Washington Post, writes that also “even one percent amounts to tens of thousands of tragic [wrongful conviction] errors”(Gross). Citizens who are wrongfully convicted are incarcerated for a crime he or she did not commit. Many police officers, prosecutors, and judges are responsible for the verdict that puts innocents into prison. To be able to get exonerated many wait over a decade just to get there case looked at, not many are able to have the opportunity of getting out.

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

Salem witchcraft trials started in New England and caused a lot of deaths and hysteria for the people of Salem, Massachusetts. Innocent women and men were hung just for being accused by their fellow friends and neighbors. Witchcraft in the 17th century was a big taboo that people feared. It started when a couple of girls from Salem encountered an African woman slave who knew about sorcery and fortune. After a few days, people noticed that they seemed different.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

Since the founding of our judicial system there have always been individuals claiming innocence to a crime that they have been found guilty of, traditionally, after their sentencing no matter how innocent they may or may not be would have to serve, live and possibly die by the decision of their peers. The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck alongside Peter J. Neufeld faces this issue by challenging the sentencing of convicted individuals who claim their innocence and have factual ground to stand upon. The Innocence Project uses the recent advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing to prove their client’s innocence by using methods that were not available, too primitive or not provided to their clients during their investigation,

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Today, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” ( US Constitution) As you can see, the Bill of Rights 6th Amendment allows the accused to understand the charges against them: the accused is told what he/ she is being accused of, who is accusing them, and is allowed to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Moreover, it allows for the movement of rightful convictions.

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

To be committed of a crime the judge or jurors must have enough evidence that there is no other possible explanation, this is referred to as beyond a reasonable doubt. If this is held true, how can someone still be wrongfully convicted? According to Sphohn, Cassia (2014) in 2008 more than 1.6 million United States citizens was imprisoned (p. 5.35). If only .5% of those individuals were innocent that would mean that 8,000 people are wrongfully convicted. That also means there are 8,000 people who are guilty of those crimes free among society.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

Luckily, it is known what causes wrongful convictions and how to fix them. Many wrongful convictions are due to mistaken eyewitnesses, jailhouse snitches, or false evidence. I think many of the wrongful convictions could be solved with harder evidence, more information. A case should not rely on a single eye witness but multiple.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

(How the) Without the rule non guilty parties convicted could be freed with reliable evidence. With having to have search warrants so that the evidence collected is considered “legal” only wastes

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

The most essential part of our judicial system is that it is based on the presumption that the accused is innocent unless proven guilty beyond doubt. Also it is better that ten guilty are held free than one innocent being falsely implicated in a case. Thus the burden of proof in a criminal case is very high.

Read More

More about Convicted People Without Evidence

Related Topics

Open Document