What we are trying to find out is more about the law of conservation of mass. The way we are trying to figure this out is by doing an experiment called the Copper Cycle which is where you start with copper and add many different chemicals and lots of process where the copper is no longer visible. We wanted to see for ourselves what happens to copper when we made many chemical changes and in the end what happened to zinc when the copper appeared. What we found out at the end is that the copper appeared again which tells us that the copper never left and was never destroyed. What we also found out that the zinc did not leave but it dissolved into the solution and displaced copper forcing it back into copper solid. Methods: On the first day, …show more content…
Next we moved the beaker into the fume hood where we added the nitric acid, HNO3(aq), where the solution started to fizzle and there was a brown gas produced called nitrogen dioxide, NO2(g), which then made the solution blue called copper nitrate, Cu(NO3)2(aq), which smelled like bleach. When we put the 25 mL of water nothing happened to the solution and looked the solution looked the same. After, we had to measure 2 mL of the concentrated sodium hydroxide, NaOH(aq), in the graduated cylinder and then poured into the beaker slowly which made the solution a darker blue and made it a solid copper hydroxide, Cu(OH)2(s). When the beaker was placed onto the hot plate the solution was turning black and into a solid that smelled bad called copper oxide, CuO(s). When it cooled down nothing happened but when the mixture was being filtered the solids stayed in the filter paper and a clear liquid came out which was sodium nitrate, NaNO3(aq). On the second day when the sulfuric acid, H2SO4(aq), was added the solid started to liquify and it started to turn blue making it copper sulfate, CuSO4(aq). After we added zinc, Zn(s) a silver element, to the beaker and stirred it until the zinc was dissolved and the liquid turned clear which was zinc sulfate, ZnSO4(aq). When we were done stirring what we were left with was copper which ended up a …show more content…
While the copper was going through the changing process this is related to the Law of Conservation of mass. These are related because we wanted to use the copper as an example to prove whether or not the copper disappeared. The law of conservation of mass states that mass can not be created or destroyed but simply its atoms rearranged to form new substances. In the experiment we started out with copper and when we added more and more chemicals and caused it to change it seemed as if the copper did leave but in fact since we ended up with the same copper it proves that the copper never left. Copper has been through many chemicals and identity changes but it also has changed phases because at first it was a solid but then it turned into an aqueous solution back to a solid repeating in a cycle. The same happened with the zinc because when we added zinc and stirred it in the solution it “disappeared” but actually what happened was that the zinc dissolved into the solution and displaced the copper into a solid and also zinc sulfate, ZnSO4(aq). Therefore, in this experiment there was no compound or anything that was destroyed due to the law of conservation of mass which means that matter isn't destroyed neither is the elements and
To calculate the percentage of Cu, we divided the final mass of the penny 0.09 and the initial mass of 2.47 and multiplied by 100. To calculate the percentage of Zn, we divided the final mass of the penny 2.38 and the initial mass of 2.47 and multiplied by 100. During the experiment the hydrochloric acid donated its hydrogen ions in the reaction and then the chloride ions reacted with the zinc ions in the solution. Thus, the zinc dissolved in the highly acidic solution which was caused by the high concentration of H2 ions. Hydrogen gas was generated during the reaction which was seen when bubbles were formed as the penny was dissolved into the beaker.
A hot plate was placed under the ring stand. 50 mL of 3.0 M NaOH in a 250 mL beaker and a stir bar was placed in the beaker. The beaker with NaOH was placed on the hot plate and 3.75 grams of NaAlO2*5H2O was placed in the beaker. The temperature probe was placed in the beaker with the solution, not touching the bottom of the beaker. The solution was heated and stirred till the solution dissolved.
Discussion 1. Zn0 (s)+ Cu2+S6+O42-(aq) →Cu0(s) + Zn2+S6+O42-(aq) Zn0(s) → Zn2+(aq) + 2e- Cu2+(aq) + 2e- → Cu0(s) Zn0(s) + Cu2+(aq) → Zn2+(aq) + Cu0(s) Oxidant (oxidizing agent) is the element which reduces in experiment.
Deductive reasoning was used by determining the identity of an unknown copper mineral by looking at different possible copper minerals in the database with observations that were taken throughout the entire lab. Through roasting, the percentage of mass could be found through the mass of copper contained in an unknown copper containing mineral sample by gravimetric analysis of the copper (II) oxide produced. Through the idea of smelting and spectroscopy the identity of the unknown copper could be found through careful calculations and analysis of the lab.
Conclusion: Compare Trial 1 and Trial 2. The Trial 1 change in mass are 12.5g, however Trial 2 changes in mass is 1.2g. The Trial 1 change in mass is more than Trial 2. And I think the Low of Conservation of Mass violated in the Trial 1 is can be exist. Because the Trial 1 actually the soda with vinegar have Chemical reactions occur and chemical
For this lab the knowledge to tell the difference between a chemical and physical changes was needed. To tell this the knowledge of the five signs of a chemical change was needed. These five signs are color change, odor change, production of bubbles/gas, production of heat/light, and the production of precipitate. Also prior to the lab one question was provided that needed to be answered. This question was what chemical must be present for a color change.
As for the rock portion of the experiment, the students concluded that the mass percent of copper was 3.1%. This mass percent of Cu2+ is above the accepted value of 1.0 percent copper, which is the economically viable percent for mining copper ore. From this value of 1% copper in copper ore manufacturers can extract 9.99% pure copper (Copper Mining and Processing: What is Copper?, n.d.). These results show that the provided sample of copper ore would be worth mining, since it contains a higher percent of cu2+ than is needed to mine for copper. Overall, the experiment was accurate in determining the mass percent of cu2+ in the rock sample.
This lab’s end result was to correctly identify each unknown solution using prior knowledge of chemical properties and the results of the first experiment conducted. Unknown solution D was the only colored solution, being blue while the others were clear. This made it easy to then match D up to Copper Sulfate because of its color. As unknown A and B were added together, lots of gaseous bubbles formed and revealed the fact that that reaction was the reaction between Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Carbonate because it was the only reaction that produced a gas release. Unknown A and C produced the only yellow, brown precipitate just as the reaction between Sodium Carbonate and Silver Nitrate had previously.
Materials The amount of copper that was obtained was not the same as the mass expected, as it was significantly greater. This may be caused by side reactions, or if the elements that were used were not truly pure. These may be some reasons that caused the amount of copper to be greater, as the mass calculated should generally be close to, or less than the mass expected in pure reactions.
In this experiment, the evolution of the copper cycle was observed through a series of reactions. Four different copper compounds are formed through different reactions to inevitably lead to the recovery of Cu(s). This primary goal of this experiment was to study the Law of Conservation of Mass and perform 5 reactions on copper compounds. As Jenna Winterberg states in her book “Conservation of Mass,” the first part of this law is that mass or matter cannot be created. The second part of the law is that mass or matter cannot be destroyed .
Abstract In this experiment the separation of a copper (II) chloride and sodium chloride mixiture was attempted. The main aim was to separate the compounds from eachother while receiving as much of the original mass of both substances as possible - in perfect conditions the original mass will be received after seperation. Many techniques were considered but dissolution, filtration and evaporation proved to be easiest and most reliable in a school environment with school equipment. The copper (II) chloride and sodium chloride mixture was dissolved in a methanol solution and filtered out leaving the sodium chloride behind.
The density of the penny was 4.68 g/cm3 before the experiment and 4.43 g/cm3 at the end of the experiment. The density of gold, though, is 19.3 g/cm3. Since the densities of the penny and the gold are different, the penny clearly did not change into another element. The gold color of the penny was a result of the flame that it was held above melting the zinc that it was coated in with the original bronze colored coating of the penny, creating an alloy with a shiny yellow color. Since neither of the pennies, silver colored or gold, changed densities throughout the experiment and each retained their own properties; the properties of copper; no new elements were
The zinc will form a new compound with the sulfate, and the copper will stay as a metal. Balanced Chemical
There are only two circumstances in which I think the copper could have been lost. The first chance where some of the lost mass of copper may have gone could have been during the first reaction. If distilled water was added to the solution before the chemical reaction finished, some copper may have been lost during that step. While all nitrogen dioxide gas seemed to have dissipated, perhaps, it was not finished yet. By stopping the reaction early, all of the solid, elemental copper may have not had a chance to react with the nitric acid, and some mass may have been lost during the step.
Using the Law of Definite Proportions, the mass of this product was used to determine the number of moles of copper and chlorine in the sample, which led to being able to determine the