Court Cases Between Victor Frankenstein And The Creature

During this court case as a jury I found it sometimes difficult to take notes because it was hard to hear but overall it was an experiences i'll do again, it was fun playing the jury making the finally decision between Victor Frankenstein and the Creature. But, in the case both sides had critical evidence in order to win over the jury. However, I believe that the lawyers of the plaintiff provided a strong case. But, I can say that both sides providing an organized and real opening statement, asked questions to the witnesses in order to provide evidence, and leading the defendants with over to their side which provided they were grasp about the case. Mostly, I do have confidence that the lawyers of the Creature knew their stuff and proved that

Victor lacks love and compassion toward his ¨child¨ leaving him to teach himself how to live, read, and write by watching the DeLacey family. Victor showed negligence because the creature felt alone and was abandoned by his ¨father¨ also at the court when Justine was put on trial for being framed by the creature for killing William Frankenstein, Victor did not say anything, Justine feels that Victor is not responsible for her death and but he could of prevented the death of Justine. Henry Clerval, who is Victor's best friend said that the creature wasn't taught beliefs and it was Victor´s authority to teach him. William, who was Victor's younger brother said that Victor could not create such a thing that he was not the one who strangled and killed him it was the creature who put his hand over my mouth and grabbed my throat and killed me. When Elizabeth being asked how she died she said she was strangled by the creature on her wedding night. Although, Victor wasn't with Elizabeth all night because he knew the creature would be there so he had to protect himself and Elizabeth. The defendant's medical expert stated that Victor is diagnosed with depression. The ethicist evidence was discredited made no