ipl-logo

Personal Narrative: My Visit To The Courthouse

993 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Observations of a courtroom

At this age, most people have never even stepped foot in a courthouse. I think everyone should visit the courthouse and sit in on a trial, it’s a great learning experience especially for student’s. I think it’s interesting that anyone can sit in a on trial and see how everything works. A defendant or plaintiff will be there for a trial, where they may view the courthouse as a serious situation that could be life-altering. Civilians could be there for jury duty and find it to be tedious and boring. My visit to the courthouse was an experience I will not forget, from the small courtrooms, to the intense Judges. Going into the Courthouse I had expectations on what I would see and hear. Until this assignment, I had never once been in a courthouse. …show more content…

I had never really seen a courthouse in person until this time. I was not surprised by the design of the exterior of the courthouse when walking up to it. It included the Greek style columns with a symmetrical, square design, which is the stereotypical look for courthouses. Another surprise for me at the courthouse was mood while in the courthouse. The mood was dark, quiet and almost creepy. I have only seen them on television which doesn’t express their size or layout. When walking into the courthouse I read all the signs because I had no idea where to go. Every trial I sat in was on the first floor which was the civil law/cases floor. Ground floor was the library and reception area. I did go and check out the library, the books in there are massive. So many different volumes to the same book, shelves after shelves. The trials I sat in were in very small courtrooms, I did go and see the larger ones which were very intimidating to me. The three courtrooms I was in were just big enough for the judges, defendant, plaintiff, interpreter, receptionist, police officer, and one bench for civilians to sit. Each courtroom was unique. Having more courtrooms is more efficient at the district court level compared to having larger courtrooms. The overall layout of the courthouse was a completely new …show more content…

Like I mentioned before I went to three different trials on two different days. What is crazy about this is that the first trial I went to on Tuesday the 20th was actually the same case on Thursday the 22nd. This case started at 8:00 A.M. Tuesday morning and was still going on Thursday when I arrived and continued to go after I left. I don’t know for sure but I believe it was still going on Friday. Sadly, enough this case was about family members fighting over money and possessions of a deceased family member. In this case the attorneys were getting very heated up and it got very intense in the room. I felt a little uncomfortable just because I don’t like seeing fighting or arguing. During the time, I was in there they took intermissions and discussed issues in separate rooms. Everything was orderly, and everyone always knew what was going on. I was not the only civilian siting in the room listening to this case. The second case was the complete opposite to the first one; short, simple and was over very

Show More
Related
1163 Words | 5 Pages

The layout of the courtroom was simple. Judge was in front center, the jury box to the right hand of the judge. To the left of the judge was the defendant and his counsel. The prosecutors were located center in between the jurors and the defendant. In the back of the courtroom was seating for the public.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

At the end of this case, the court had this to

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

The evidence presented by both sides in the courtroom, would have long lasting effects on everyone involved in the case, as well as the millions of Americans that were following the trial. Visual testimony in any trial, especially a murder trial can have many effects on the outcome of a trial. Both prosecutors, and defense attorneys have a huge burden to fulfill in order

Read More
1968 Words | 8 Pages

I never knew lawyers and judges talked openly about a case in front of the public. Tyrone Taylor’s lawyer public defender Richard E. Rydelek wanted to make sure nothing was going to be asked to self-incriminate his self from his rights of the Fifth Amendment. After that agreement was set, two policemen retrieved already incarcerated from behind the doors of the judge chambers. Once Tyrone Taylor sat down his lawyer Richard E. Rydelek wanted to guarantee in front of the judge again that nothing would be asked to self-incriminate his client. Judge Green then asked defense lawyer

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

Lawyers presenting their arguments face the nine Justices are given a limited amount of time to present, however, justices may interrupt with questions. Abe Fortas, selected to represent Gideon, masterfully answered the justices questions while presenting the important points of his case. After the oral presentation, the justices confer in private discussion and select a judge to write the opinion of the court. For Gideon v. Wainwright Justice Black wrote the opinion and presented the court’s decision to overrule Betts v. Brady, a case he’d dissented on twenty years earlier.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

(Craig Hemmens, 2017)” 3. What role did the defense attorney play in this case? What sort of defense did s/he mount for the defendant? Did s/he seem to perform to the best of his/her ability in regard to the case? Did s/he do anything that seemed to violate his/her duty?

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Observe a Jury or Court Trial Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Author’s Note Observe a Jury or Court Trial This court case involves a serial killer, Jeffrey Dahmer, convicted of killing about 17 men between 1978 and 1991 (Jeffrey Dahmer - Full Trial - Serial Killer, 2012). The jury is composed of seven men and seven women who were to determine if Jeffrey Dahmer was guilty of the multiple murders. The jury begins by ordering for a three week sanity test to determine if Jeffrey Dahmer was sane when he committed the acts.

Read More
2037 Words | 9 Pages

The bailiff spent most of that hearing on his cell phone. The other lawyers were talking amongst themselves. A few rows ahead of me, a little girl was reading the numbers on the clock behind us, waving and talking to me, and later, leaning down and whispering with her mother. Judge Teague was seen propping his head on his hand as he listened to all the facts.

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

Like the Electoral College, several of the plans made by the Founding Fathers have lost some of their practicality. What worked in the past does not always work in the future, and this is the case for the jury system. The sole reason it was created was to ensure that each citizen was guaranteed a fair trial, which was a main concern due to Britain’s monarchy. In modern times, however, the judicial branch of the United States could easily give every citizen a fair trial with only a judge presiding over the case. It is clear that bench trials are superior to trials by jury because the citizens on juries are unqualified or biased, its benefits do not outweigh its burdens, and its claim to encourage civic duty is false.

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Texas has two high-courts, the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals, each have 9 justices. Below the two high-courts is the Court of Appeals with 14 courts, 80 justices, followed by district Courts, which have 456 courts with 456 judges, and the County-Level Courts having 505 Courts and 505 judges. Below these are the municipal courts in 920 cities, 6 towns with 1559 judges and justice of the peace courts having 819 courts with 819 judges. Overlapping of jurisdictions causes great confusion add to the confusion is that “some courts have specialized jurisdiction, whereas others have broad authority to handle a variety of cases” (277) creating a “hodgepodge of courts” (277). Reforms within the Texas court system is clearly needed and many reforms have been recommended from merging the Texas Supreme Court with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, reducing the number of judges and justices, revamping jurisdictions for all courts and having no overlapping jurisdictions.

Read More
197 Words | 1 Pages

When I trudged into the brown colored courtroom, I felt every set of eyes look at me. I felt everyone waiting for me to do or say something that would get me punished without thinking twice. They all knew that yesterday I had sworn to tell the truth, and that oath I could not break. There was one man in particular I knew I would not like.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Going up from there are the circuit courts, the district courts of appeal, and the supreme court. There are 67 county courts, one in each county. These courts are of limited jurisdiction and deal with only minor offenses. The circuit courts are the states courts of original jurisdiction and are courts of record. They also hear appeals from the county courts.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

My first court day with Tulsa Municipal Court House Since I was a kid, I had always wanted to be a lawyer. Therefore, me being judge inside a court room made me feel embarrass and ashamed of what I had always plan to become. Although, I tried hard to keep my strength to not let this situation put me down towards my future. It still become a small effect on me. I never would have imagined myself sitting inside a court room in the wrong over traffic tickets.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

In this paragraph, the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury will be discussed. The main advantages are that juries introduce community values into the legal process and can influence the system (Joyce, 2013); they can achieve a sense of equity and fairness without enforcing unjust laws; in addition, juries are independent and neutral (Davies, 2015). Moreover, they guarantee participation from the public in a democratic institution (Hostettler, 2004), and represent the population thanks to the randomness with which jurors are decided (Davies, 2015). On the other hand, the most important disadvantages are that jurors have no prior contact with the courts, no training (Hostettler, 2004) and therefore they lack knowledge of law, courtroom proceedings (Joyce, 2013), and lack of ability to understand the legal directions (Thomas, 2010). Moreover, they must face evidence which is highly technical (Hostettler, 2004).

Read More

More about Personal Narrative: My Visit To The Courthouse

Related Topics

Open Document