ipl-logo

Comparing The Due Process Model To Achieve The Goals Of The Criminal Justice System

1013 Words5 Pages

In order to achieve the goals of the American criminal justice system, two different models present the basics of how cases are to be handled. The first model, called the crime control model, was developed by Herbert Packer in the 1960s. Its emphasis lies with priority being placed on aggressive arrest, prosecution, and conviction of criminals while adhering to the strictest interpretations of the law (Perron, n.d.). The other model, the due process model, is basically the opposite in that it is more concerned about protecting individual rights of the accused. The cases of Mapp, Miranda, Gideon, and Escobedo are all examples of the due process model. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) examined the issue of unlawful search and seizure. In this particular …show more content…

As mentioned, the crime control model’s goal is to suppress criminal activity at all cost, while due process aims to protect the defendant’s rights. Essentially, crime control places focus on the community and the main concern of due process is lies with the individual. This dictates to a great extent how the police, courts, and correctional procedures carry out their business. Due process requires the system to get the job done without violating any rights of the individual. Crime control, on the other hand, requires strict adherence to the law regardless of any protections that may be in place for individual …show more content…

The previously examined cases of Mapp, Miranda, Gideon, and Escobedo were all decided during the 1960s, which was a time when Americans were becoming more concerned with how the criminal justice system treated the individual. Prior to that time, courts were only focused on punishing those who broke the law to the fullest extent of the law. There was little concern over whether a person was being charged while at the same time being protected against those in the system who might tread on the personal liberties outlined within the Constitution. This social awareness led to a movement where numerous cases ended up being a appealed based on violations of those civil rights. Consequently, each model has a different impact on the victims of crime. When the crime control model is in place, victims are essentially guaranteed that someone will be charged and convicted and that they will obtain full justice under the law. Crime control, by its very nature, does not really provide opportunities for defendants to walk away on a technicality. This model also does not place much emphasis on taking care of the victim in the aftermath of the crime and court case. The victims are often left to fend for

Show More
Related
1593 Words | 7 Pages

v. Clayton, held that the police officers did not infringe Mr. Clayton and Mr. Farmer’s rights under ss. 8 and ss. 9 of the Charter as their unusual behaviour gave the officer reasonable grounds to conduct a pat down search. This case is significant to us for various reasons. First of all this case shows us the circumstances, when a police officer has the right to detain an individual without a search warrant.

Read More
1587 Words | 7 Pages

Question 2 In the case of Mapp v. Ohio, Dollree Mapp was at the center of an investigation regarding a search for a potential bombing suspect. The bombing suspect was thought to be residing in Dollree Mapp’s residence. The police originally approached Mapp’s residence and requested permission to search the residence for the bombing suspect, equipment, and gambling equipment. Mapp consulted her attorney, and declined to allow the officers to enter the residence without a search warrant.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Name Tutor Course Date Marbury v. Madison 1. Summary of the history of the case and its significance on our structure of government.

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

This is a criminal case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that there was no probable cause to arrest Hayes. Hayes did not give consent to be taken to the police station and be detained plus fingerprint. Therefore, Hayed Fourth Amendment rights were violated and the conviction was overturned. Fact of the case: In the 1980’s there was a series of rape and burglary that happened in Punta Gorda Florida.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 vote in favor of Mapp. The Supreme Court stated that evidence obtained from an unreasonable or illegal search and seizure couldn’t be used against the accused in state court. Before the ruling, federal courts were required to suppress evidence gathered illegally. The decision extended the rule — known as the exclusionary rule — to state courts. The change has put continuing pressure on police departments to conduct investigations lawfully and brought increased scrutiny when their actions appear improper.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

To which amendment to the constitution does the case relate? Mapp appealed her case to the Supreme Court stating that the 4th Amendment should be incorporated. The 4th Amendment prohibits against unreasonable searches and seizures, and during Mapp’s arrest, the police came to the founding of the evidence presented in the trial without a warranty. Fourth Amendment states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

The arguments of the Scopes Trial, which is also known as the “Monkey Trial”, have been carried far past the year of 1925. When laws are challenged it shakes the town or city one is apart of. This was true for the U.S. as a whole. The Scopes Trial has never been forgotten, and its repercussions are evident. The trial demonstrated lawful challenges.

Read More
1872 Words | 8 Pages

41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

Youngblood case has great relevance to today’s and future court cases. There are three things that this case has proved to today’s society. The first is that it covered the potential acts of good faith in the police officer, and how the evidence that was claimed to not be stored properly. The defendant blamed the officer and thought they should be accountable for the length of Youngblood’s sentences. It has been proven that even though the evidence is an essential piece to the individual case, the officer should not be held fully responsible for the entire sentence for a mistake.

Read More
1718 Words | 7 Pages

This is a model that allows people to get what they deserve, however it is lead by restraint. Restraint allows for a delay in order to deliberate and decide on a punishment that fits the crime nicely rather than being over or under sized. By allowing an outside source to view the case, the goal is that both sides points are understood and taken into account. Questions are asked such as what is enough? How far is too far?

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

The Fourth Amendment was created in response to the British practice of issuing a general warrant—warrants that were not limited in scope. The ultimate check that the Amendment places on law enforcement is one of “reasonableness.” This creates two broad categories of searches: searches that would be unreasonable without a warrant and searches that do not require a warrant. For example, warrants are not relevant in the context of school administration. However, warrants have historically always been required in the course of ordinary law enforcement.”

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

A comparison between the Due process model and crime control model Within the criminal justice system, there are two competing models: the crime control model and the due process model. These two models were constructed by Robert Packer and each represents a particular school of thought. In managing crime, there is the individual i.e. the suspect and there is the society. The due process model is seen to focus on the suspect whereas the crime control model focuses on the society. This paper analyzes these two models and based on the rate of crime in the society, makes recommendations as to which is the best model in criminal justice.

Read More
1798 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Crime, its punishment, and the legislation that decides the way in which they interact has long been a public policy concern that reaches everyone within a given society. It is the function of the judicial system to distribute punishment equitably and following the law. The four traditional goals of punishment, as defined by Connecticut General Assembly (2001), are: “deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation.” However, how legislature achieves and balances these goals has changed due to the implementation of responses to changing societal influences. Mandatory minimum sentences exemplify this shift.

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.

Read More

More about Comparing The Due Process Model To Achieve The Goals Of The Criminal Justice System

Related Topics

Open Document