ipl-logo

Crime Lineups Paper

754 Words4 Pages

Historically, eyewitness accounts of a crime were a vital piece of evidence used in the prosecution of criminal offenses. Lineups were a method used where typically a group of individuals not involved in the crime along with the suspect whom is believed to be directly related to the crime are grouped together for the witness to review in the hopes to identify the suspect. This is accomplished in two ways, the first is simultaneous where several photos are grouped together at the same time (typically six) for the witness to review. This specific procedure raises the issue of certainty from the witness. The issue occurs as the witness has reviewed the array of photos narrowing each down to the one that appears to be the most likely suspect. …show more content…

This specific procedure necessitates the witness to view each photo separately from the rest so not to pick the suspect due to his/her close similarity. When reviewing photos sequentially, one will be more likely to compare the photo to their memory rather than to the others grouped together. Lineups continue to be called to question from the defense in that there is always the possibility the results may produce a false identification of a suspect. This is commonly due to the officer inadvertently providing verbal or no-verbal clues as the witness reviews the lineup. In addition, lineups are to be construct so those displayed have similarities such a facial hair, eye glass, or skin tone. One photo cannot stand out in comparison of the others. For example, should the description provided by the witness include a mustache, then the other person within the lineup should all have similar mustaches. Guidance, provided by the officer, is an additional requirement when presenting a lineup to a witness. PRIOR to the officer presenting the lineup, he or she should provide instructions to the witness as to the common practice when attempting to identify a …show more content…

This specific procedure raises the issue of certainty from the witness. The issue occurs as the witness has reviewed the array of photos narrowing each down to the one that appears to be the most likely suspect. This process can provide false identification and lead the investigation in the incorrect direction or worst criminally charging and convicting the wrong person. The second, and more effective way, is the Sequential lineup. This specific procedure necessitates the witness to view each photo separately from the rest so not to pick the suspect due to his/her close similarity. When reviewing photos sequentially, one will be more likely to compare the photo to their memory rather than to the others grouped together. Lineups continue to be called to question from the defense in that there is always the possibility the results may produce a false identification of a suspect. This is commonly due to the officer inadvertently providing verbal or no-verbal clues as the witness reviews the lineup. In addition, lineups are to be construct so those displayed have similarities such a facial hair, eye glass, or skin tone. One photo cannot stand out in comparison of the others. For example, should the description provided by the witness include a mustache, then the other person within the lineup should all have similar

Show More
Related
1367 Words | 6 Pages

She was shown photographs which included Hay’s photograph (taken 18 months earlier) and she selected him as an 80% likeness. Three weeks later, she was shown a sequence of photographs which included one of Hay (taken hours after the murder) and she did not select any photograph. At a second identification process, Maillard didn’t select any photographs and, when shown the photograph of Hay she stated that he looked very different and that in his arrest photo, he did not have a gaunt face like that of the second gunman at the club. An article by Pezdek, Abed & Cormia (2021) explores the relationship between stress and eyewitness memory accuracy, as well as the relationship between stress and eyewitness confidence. They found that stress impairs the accuracy of eyewitness memory but not the confidence-accuracy relationship.

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Statement of Facts: The prisoner was made to wear a green shirt in a lineup because it was important to the case. No other participant in the lineup was wearing a green shirt. Victim did not see the assailant’s face but knew he wore a green shirt. Issues: Was the fact that the prisoner was the only one who was made to wear a green shirt make the lineup impermissibly suggestive?

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Detectives emphasized to David that the assailant may or may not be in the photo line up. Detectives also "told him they had arrested the man who raped him, and asked him to pick the assailant out of a photographic lineup. " David then picked Larry Youngblood as his assailant out of the photo line up. Although the photo lineup that David was given was reliable many other parts of this case were not.

Read More
2232 Words | 9 Pages

In addition to the visual tests, the matching pairs were subjected to comparative refractive index tests. Paper particles obtained were given a Hirshberg stain test. The Hirshberg test is a test of binocular motor alignment by which a penlight is shone at the eyes and the position of the light reflex on the cornea observed, allowing an estimate of the amount of deviation, if present. Finally a solubility test was applied. The witness determined that each matching set was an independent subject from each other matching set, and that by the law of statistical probabilities the victim's clothing, which was the source of one particle in each set, had been in contact with the defendant's automobile or clothing, the sources of the second particle of each

Read More
1230 Words | 5 Pages

The reliability and admissibility of evidence becomes a foundation to this truth as any evidence presented cannot contain elements which can provide doubt towards the validity of the prosecution. This can be shown through guideline 14 of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions agreement to provide advice for the NSW police towards the legal limitations or consequences of evidence obtained during the course of an investigation (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions n.d). Identification evidence in particular has a lower weight and strength for admission to a court due to the fallibility and circumstantial nature of witnesses. The admissibility of identification evidence was previously determined by judges based on its quality with case law such as R v. Christie providing principles for discretionary powers for admissibility and Alexander v. R providing methods satisfactory to the court for identification such as identification parades under common law. (R v. Christie 1914; Alexander v. R 1981).

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

This week’s topic was very interesting to learn about how important eyewitnesses can be when a crime and accidents do occur. In the case that was presented in the 60-minute segment of Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson is exactly how legal system can fail us when it comes to the eyewitnesses’ identification testimony and how a person’s perception and memory can be altered. The aspect of psychology and law research from this week’s course material is most relevant to the topic of perception and memory. The memory has different stages the first is encoding the process of entering perception into memory.

Read More
1926 Words | 8 Pages

As stated earlier, the first point of identification is the police or any professional who may so be called to identify any vulnerabilities. After identification is done, information is sent to the next level for it to be captured and acted upon. After a decision is taken by the higher agencies like the crown prosecution service and witness protection and the court, the necessary measures are then applied with strong collaboration between or among the relevant agencies. Identification is thus a process and as was shown in R-v-Green Youth Court herein, even the most straight forwards decision like may be an issue and measures and assistance are not merely granted on the basis of

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

The police place him in a lineup to have the victim identify who he was but she was unable to. Even though she was not able to identify him, police still had his description of his truck which led him to the police station anyways so they proceeded to interrogate him to see if they could

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Effects of post identification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334–346. Lindsay, R., & Wells, G. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556–564.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Beginning with Gary Dotson accused of kidnapping and raping Cathleen Cowell. She contacted the police and worked with them. telling them what happen, how the perp looked and collected evidence from her. Within a few weeks later she got called to look at mug shots, where she picked Gary Dotson photo. When asked why she had picked that photo Cathleen stated “that the police pressured her to pick the photograph, pointing out how closely it resembled the composite sketch, although police denied the allegation” (“First DNA exoneration, center on wrongful convictions: Bluhm legal clinic, northwestern Pritzker school of law,” n.d.).

Read More
110 Words | 1 Pages

Own-race identifications are those in which people distinguish someone of the same race as their own. Cross-race identifications mean identifying individuals from a race different from our own. A comprehensive study, with 271 real court cases, was conducted in connection with these issues and the results revealed that witnesses pertinently identified 65% of the defendants who were of the same race as them. On the other hand, 45% of the defendants were identified who belonged to a different race than the witnesses. A further scientific study also indicates that own-race identifications are liable to be more precise, by 10 percent to 15 percent, than cross-race identifications (Eysenck and Keane

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

In 'An Inspector Calls', the inspector uses a photo of Eva Smith to get information out of the Birlings. In the play, the inspector shows Mr Birling a photo of Eva that he immediately recognises, yet he does not let anyone else see it. “Both GERALD and ERIC rise to have a look at the photograph, but the INSPECTOR interposes himself between them” This could give the audience the impression that the inspector is hiding something from them. However, he passes it off by saying “-one line of inquiry at a time.

Read More
2432 Words | 10 Pages

This paper will discuss all those factors which could lead a person into giving inaccurate information during an investigation. Eyewitnesses are a crucial part of an investigation because on them depends the verdict given to the person who supposedly committed a crime. If a person gives an inaccurate testimony to the court

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

The difference between peripheral and central memory shows us why sometimes eyewitness have memory of details and sometimes they do not. Research and Meta analyses show that stress has more of a negative impact than a positive impact on eyewitness testimony, as they face difficulty in identifying a perpetrator from a lineup and recall certain details of the crime. In these studies, witnesses are typically asked to report information in two ways; interrogative and narrative. In narrative, witnesses are asked to say what they recall and have the ability to chose what information they want to report. The interrogative type of recall is when the police ask specific questions that the witness needs to respond to.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

Loftus proved how in legal terms, eye witness’s recall of an event could have been altered by the way they were questioned. Loftus states that what a witness remembers is a recreation image based on the memory that was changed. 1 of the studies that were influenced by this, was an examination how lawyer’s complicate questions have a negatively affect eyewitness accuracy and confidence. In this study it proved how using confusion language, participants were less exact in their eyewitness reports and less confident of there answers than those who were asked straightforward questions. Loftus research proved that when eyewitnesses are shown a picture line up of the suspect, their accuracy lessens as new faces are added into their reconstruction of the original event.

Read More

More about Crime Lineups Paper

Related Topics

Open Document