Criminal Justice System Essay

1489 Words6 Pages

Literature Review
Criminal justice today: The Court System and the Drug Offenders in the 21st Century

Beckett (2000), found new perceptions of supporting methods that involves influences relating opinions of the public, associated with crime problems, the main argument is, not increasing occurrence of criminal behavior, that has led to the main topic discussion on crimes and punishments within American today as it relates to concerns of social issue that has reached record level currently, and opinions from the public displaying possibilities on providing their support to punitive policy, such as the death penalty, three strike law, and sentencing laws, final result would be outstanding examples on how interdisciplinary research can or will …show more content…

Programs provide supports from parts of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP) associated with the Center of Substance Abuse Treatment TOPPS II funding provided from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Data includes various counties supporting studies and members of the UCLA integrated substance abuse programs, in relations the voters in the state of California that approved the “Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) known as the Proposition 36 this program used data studied from community treatment …show more content…

Study shows that utilizing inmate self-report survey from 2002 and 2004 in order to evaluate the characteristics of prison and jail populations within the U.S. and evaluates questions to there are so many drug-involved offenders are being incarcerated. Analysis shows that four issues have prevented drug courts from considerably decreasing the flow into prisons and jails. In declining order of importance, these drug courts eligibility requirements are strict and certain sentencing requirements, legal penalties of programs non-compliance, and restrictions in drug courts functions and funding. Drug courts would only have ability to assist lower prisons and jails populations if considerable changes are prepared in the eligibility and sentencing