The Criminalization Of Homelessness
Imagine a world where it contends to be illegal to sit down. Could people survive if there were no place where they would be allowed to fall asleep, to store their belongings, or to stand still? For most of people, these scenarios imply something so unrealistic to the point of ludicrousy. But, for homeless people across America, these circumstances are an ordinary part of daily life. Millions of people in the world today are facing homelessness or inadequate housing. Inadequate housing contends to be housing that exists in poor conditions, unsafe or situated in a high density area. By definition a person experiencing homelessness contends to be an individual without permanent housing who may live on the
…show more content…
It's appears that criminalization contends to be necessary to end some aspects of homelessness, such as panhandling and loitering. “People cannot camp and take over parts of our city and state property that has been built and designed for everyone, not one specific group," said Mayor Kirk Caldwell of Honolulu. By way of explanation, basically the Mayor of Honolulu argues that homeless persons are greedy for fancying a place to stay. These people would only possess these places, nothing more. So in reality, what gives the impression of greediness, the homeless possessing an allowed area for camping, or the city desiring the place for even more attractions?
Anti-homeless laws are constitutional. Supporters of homeless criminalization, argue that anti-panhandling laws do not violate free speech protections because they are “content-neutral”. They only regulate the manner in which people ask for money, not what they say in asking for it. They are objecting to panhandling because they believe those who ask for help incessantly and in highly visible places create a nuisance. But, anyone would constantly ask for help if they were going through a hardship, or should they just give up and not