ipl-logo

D. R.: Case Study

812 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Child safety (essay 100 words

In re D.R., 2014-Ohio-832

Court That Heard The Case: Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District, Cuyahoga County

Facts of the Case: On February 23, 2013, at approximately 11 p.m., D.R. broke into the home of Mr. Ted Ziolkowski carrying a loaded gun. The juvenile gained entry into the home by prying open the rear door with a pry bar and a screwdriver. Home alone, Ziolkowski heard someone at his back door and the sound of wood falling hitting the ground. As Ziolkowski eased towards the door to see what was going on the door flew open. Ziolkowski shot the intruder. He immediately dialed 911 when D.R. collapsed to the ground. Police arrived on the scene and D.R. was by the back door laying on the ground with a gunshot wound to his …show more content…

Did the trial court make an error when it adjudicated D.R. guilty of delinquency and then dismissed the complaint under Juv.R. 29(F)(2)(d) in the best interest of the child and the public?
2. Is the trial court prohibited from dismissing the complaint under Juv.R. 29(F)(2)(d)?
3. Did the trial court commit an abuse of discretion when it dismissed the complaint under Juv.R. 29(F)(2)(d) even though the record was contrary to the best interest of the public and the child?

Conclusion: The Eighth Appellate District Court of Appeals of Ohio had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal and dismissed the case. In addition, the court ordered that appellee grant relief of appropriate costs to appellant.

Rules Utilized: Juv.R. 29(F)(2)(d) and R.C. 2945.67(A) In re N.I.; In re …show more content…

's health deteriorated as a direct result of the shot to his chest. He had emergency surgery which lead to a narrowing of the aortic valve opening, aortic stenosis. Thus causing D.R. to have poor circulation in his lower extremities and an increase of pressure that could only be relieved surgically. An infection developed in the bone after his second surgery. It required the amputation of his leg below the right knee during his third surgery. However, it did not improve his poor circulation and as a result became bound to a wheelchair. The Chief Medical Director, Dr. John Bradley, for the Ohio Department of Youth Services ("ODYS") testified during the court’s dispositional hearing that D.R. 's medical concerns demand extensive attention. To improve his circulation major cardiovascular surgery was essential. In addition, D.R. must undergo another operation to mend the damage done to his abdominal wall. Dr. Bradley testified that D.R. would need approximately nine months to a year of medical care. Although the child’s record was defiant, Juv.R. 29(F)(2)(d) clearly defines the dispositions within the power of the juvenile court to remove any conflict between the lawful dispositions and those authorized by rule. Given the cost for ODYS to house the child, plus their incapability to care for his medical conditions, and the safety risks involved the trial court determined that a dismissal to be in the best interest of the child’s safety and the public

Show More
Related

Hayden Vs Letitia Case Study

676 Words | 3 Pages

The judge ruled that the University of Notre Dame did in fact owe Letitia Hayden a duty to take necessary precautions to protect her from injury, caused by the actions of other fans in the area that were trying to get ahold of the ball in the same seating area. It was also found that the trial court was in fact incorrect in originally entering summary judgment and finding that no duty existed in favor of the University of Notre

Read More

Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More

Sucklal Case Summary

156 Words | 1 Pages

This consolidated appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action, a foreclosure action, and a motion for possession of property initiated in the Circuit Court for Howard County. Mortgagor Sirina Sucklal (“Sucklal”), appellant, challenges the grant of summary judgment to the substitute trustees Mark H. Wittstadt, and Gerard Wm. Wittstadt, Jr. (collectively, “Substitute Trustees”), the ratification of the foreclosure sale, and the subsequent grant of a motion for judgment awarding possession to the purchasers at the foreclosure sale. On appeal, Sucklal presents six questions for our review, which we have condensed and rephrased as follows: 1.

Read More

Case Study On Mary Sanders Lee

443 Words | 2 Pages

The defendants LAPD and NY Corrections appeal the District Court. Issue: The District Court dismissed all claims against NY Corrections and LAPD for lack of subject matters such as jurisdiction. The district Court also dismissed all federal claims against the defendants. Yes, the court made the right decision to dismiss the claims made by the defendants. Holding:

Read More

Jacob Winkleman Case Summary

806 Words | 4 Pages

The problem arose when the parents were dissatisfied with the due process hearing;

Read More

Ethics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital

503 Words | 3 Pages

Another could have been the doctor's superiors or any one of the nurses who witnessed him, place the cast on the leg, however, they didn't say anything thus why they were in the predicament in the first place. Another is himself because he could have said that he felt that the cast was too tight. Let alone all of this happened in less than one day. Meaning that it was most likely the constriction portion, meaning that the cast felt like a boa constrictor was warped around his leg. In this case, the best guess for the type of gangrene is dry gangrene, which is primarily caused by construction, poor circulation, and also diabetes.

Read More

Morris Kent Case

840 Words | 4 Pages

The juvenile courts need to go off of the seriousness of the case. In my opinion, if juveniles don’t get the proper charges, then there is always a chance that the juvenile could always continue to commit crimes. In this case, I believe Kent did not fully get his basic due process rights that should be granted to him. He was never fully investigated, which lead to the waiver eventually being

Read More

Arizona Supreme Court Case Barry Jones

797 Words | 4 Pages

If the defendant could prove that they received “ineffective assistance of counsel both at trial and during state-level appeals, and therefore they never had competent counsel to raise trial-level claims,” they could raise those claims for the first time during federal habeas review (Oyez). Jones presented the evidence that neighboring boys had hit Rachel in the stomach with a metal bar a day or two before her death. It was believed that this was what caused Rachel Gray’s internal bleeding and it was not Barry Jones who was at fault for the death of the 4-year-old. The reason for Jones not necessarily being at fault is because he admitted when the 4-year-old became extremely ill, and instead of taking her to the hospital, Jones was paying more attention to the drugs he was doing (Santa Cruz and Torres, 2023).

Read More

Summary Of The Petitioner V. Collins

603 Words | 3 Pages

He succumbed to the injuries and died 9 days later. The suspect was then held and charged with capital murder. Ten years after

Read More

Ingraham V. Bollinger Case Summary

284 Words | 2 Pages

Winnebago County Social Services (1989) and Ingraham v. Wright (1977). I disagree with the Deshaney v. Winnebago County Social Services (1989) case because I think the judge should have did something to protect the child. They just let the father beat, bruise, and hospitalized the poor child. I disagree with the Ingraham v. Wright (1977) case because Supreme Court the the principle hit on the child under his will and bruise him to where he was out almost a whole week of school. I think this cruel and the Supreme Court should reopen the case

Read More

What Are The Advantages Of Wyman V. James

146 Words | 1 Pages

In Wyman v. James, the Supreme Court held that the beneficiary of the Aid to the Families with the Dependent Children must allow a house visit by a case manager, when the law requires it, or relinquish her entitlement to open help. The Supreme Court did not view it as a pursuit in fourth amendment terms. Regardless of the possibility that the visit were a pursuit, the Court said it was sensible: it was made for the advantage of the kid; it was "a gentle means" of guaranteeing that duty stores are appropriately spent; the case manager was not a "uniformed authority"; and the beneficiary had the decision of summoning her entitlement to decline or relinquishing the advantages. Three contradicting Justices (William Douglas, William Brennan, Thurgood

Read More

Gault Case Summary

612 Words | 3 Pages

The rights he should have been given in court was a fair trial for a kid his age. The judge was very harsh on him, which I guess may have been a

Read More

Essay On Exclusionary Rule

566 Words | 3 Pages

541 (1952). This two ruling stated that the way the person is brought before the court is not relevant for the court to proceed forth with the trial. The district court refused to dismiss the indictment on these grounds (Ross, B.

Read More

Forget The Legend And Read The Work: Teaching Two Stories By Ernest Hemingway

977 Words | 4 Pages

All the adrenaline Uncle George and Dr. Adams shared during the surgery and “success” have since faded. Not only had Dr. Adams lost the life of an individual, but he scarred his brother and son with his good

Read More

Family Court Reflection

631 Words | 3 Pages

Basically there were two parents trying to get custody over there three year old son. The father of the son initially had brought the mother to court because he stated he felt like he could endure his son needs and she couldn’t. Therefore the mother on the other side didn’t have a layer she was defending for herself. She was very distraught because she just couldn’t understand why her child might be taken away from her with the exception of every other weekend. However in this case the dad ended up winning custody over his son because the judge decided that she was unfit because she currently didn’t have a job and she had moved to another part of North Carolina with the son and basically trying to take the dad out of son’s

Read More

More about D. R.: Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document