Damien Echols Argumentative Essay

125 Words1 Pages
Next, the court had no evidence that Damien Echols was the murderer of these boys. None of Damien, Jasons, and Jessie’s DNA was found by the river where the three boys were murdered. The court believed they were the murderers because, of the things they wore, music listened to, and their pasts. So, the court used their “evidence” based on judgment, but no real proof that it could be Damien. How can you be so incredibly ignorant to lock up someone who is innocent when you know they are. The court is throwing away Damien’s life for something he never did which is absolutely insane. In sum, the court having no evidence except the biased judgments, Damien should be allowed to live in our neighborhood.