Following the Way of Nature Lao- Tzu, a incisive poet- philosopher of the mysterious Tao, father of the philosophical religion of Taoism. Plato, mathematically- minded theorizer of forms, father of the academic philosophy and western rationalism. Western and Eastern philosophy have an substantial differences that can change geographical and cultural distance. In this literature paper, I will argue that Tao's religious ground and Daoism has an more human construct that believes in a supreme being rather than Plato with more anthropocentric. This paper will compare the two philosophies, and demonstrate the superiority of Lao Tzu's theory of formlessness. Both Plato and Lao- Tzu are connected via metaphysics and ethics. This paper will proceed to prove the differences between Plato's form of knowledge and Lao- Tzu knowledge of formlessness. Lao Tzu had an honest concept of formlessness through the method which leads to ultimate reality. They follow a movement of Daoism. Daoism is a source of entity that does not need to be …show more content…
Daoist views Dao as a supreme being deity that rules the world and humans. Daoist stood on the ground that a believers' goal was to harmonize themselves with Dao. This means that Daoist are supposed to seek for harmony and self- perfection to harmonize with Dao. Daoist principles make it quite clear that in order to connect with the ground and all the beings, one must not follow the intelligible form of things back there to their first principle (CH.XI, 15). Lao Tzu notion of formlessness is a amazing, structured phenomenon. There is one important fact that Lao Tzu informs is that you must go with the flow of life and eventually goal will be accomplished. The Way guides the individual to the end goal. Formlessness does not plan but it is to act upon with impulse of