Dating Is Dead Going Retro Can Fix It Analysis

Michael Leibowitz, a writer for the New York Times voices her own concern for secular dating in her article “Dating is Dead. Going Retro Can Fix It”. Leibowitz’s vast use of figurative language and shared empathy shine new hope upon those searching for real meaningful relationships by introducing the idea of integrating traditional dating values within the modern dating climate.

Michele uses informal diction and various forms of metaphors in order to create a painted idea of how modern-day dating should be, in terms of praising traditional dating while critiquing secular dating. Michele states “But while dating is more convenient than it has ever been (people find dates while sitting on the toilet), it’s clearly falling short”. This is a

Leibowitz achieves this through the use of diction and tone to compel the reader into believing that she knows what she is talking, about and about what is wrong with modern-day dating. Additionally, Leibowitz also uses irony in an attempt to make people realize how sexual intimacy is prioritized in modern-day relationships, rather than more meaningful and long-term aspects. Leibowitz states "In today's largely online world, burnout, opacity, and callousness define dating, reflecting the values of the society that prizes individualism, privacy, and choice in nearly all things.” Using negative words such as opacity and callousness conveys that the author is knowledgeable in this subject and she knows that modern dating lacks many aspects of a good functioning relationship even though it can be convenient. These impactful words also aid in creating a tone that will make the audience ponder about the pros of traditional dating and why it should be implemented more in this society. Michele Leibowitz also uses the Irony “while it's not uncommon to date for months or even years without broaching the big questions about marriage and children, other forms of intimacy tend to be embraced more quickly.” This quote shows how modern-day dating is a lot more convenient and informal. Furthermore, the use of diction and an ironic