ipl-logo

David Foster Wallace's Essay: Ethics And The New Genetics

1582 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics in natural sciences

Prepare For Future Some people say that human has to eat other creatures because human used too many years and experienced too many difficulties for standing on the top of the food chain. Humans deserve to eat other animals. In Buddhism, it publicizes that every life is equal. With this education, the Dalai Lama always thinks things in moral ways. Thus, he writes an essay called “Ethics and the New Genetics”. He thinks that this world is developing so fast. Human needs to slow down their steps and treat things in more moral ways. Also, when the other writer called David Foster Wallace went to the Maine Lobster Festival, he saw how heartless people treat with lobsters. Thus, an essay called “Consider the Lobster” was published. Wallace …show more content…

As the human, we stand at the top of the food chain. Thus, we can do whatever we want. We start to use animals to improve our lives. For example, we use animals’ furs to keep us warm in winter. Unfortunately, at the beginning of this cruel thing happens, the public just treat it as the luxury business since it is so expensive and not everyone can own it. People ignore how merciless hunters and businessmen are when they hunt and make those furs as goods for selling. With time going, people start to realize that killing uncommon creatures for people’s privacy desire is not a good thing. One of those people is the Dalai Lama. He declares, “We must be willing to be revolted when science—or for that matter any human activity—crosses the line of human decency, and we must fight to retain the sensitivity that is otherwise so easily eroded.”(139) The “human decency” here means that with the development of science, the ways people use science to gain profit for them are more mature than before. However, people use science without any judge. People ignore the respect of other creatures because people think it is reasonable to kill other animals and eat them. However, there still have several people stand out and claim for those poor creatures. Wallace writes in a sympathetic way when he connects the feeling of human and other creatures, “The reason it seems extreme to me appears to be that I believe animals are less morally important than human being.”(509) Since people think humans are the wisest creature in this world, the most important thing for humans lives in this world is to enjoy everything. Also, no other animals are as influential as humans is an inherent thought in humans’ brains. However, every life is equal. It is hard to give other creatures labels whether they are or are not morally important enough. Killing animals is a selfish and

Show More
Related

Summary Of Consider The Lobster

489 Words | 2 Pages

Foster Wallace’s article “Consider the Lobster” was published in Gourmet magazine, and is about the cruelties involved in eating lobster that many people consider elegant. Wallace starts off in this article by discussing the 56th Annual Maine Lobster Festival where over 25,000 pounds of fresh-caught lobster were eaten, and cooking competition were also available. In this article, Wallace discusses everything from how the lobster is caught, stored, and the cruel method in which these lobsters are cooked and finally consumed and also defined what lobster is by saying it’s a giant sea-insect. Furthermore, Wallace goes on to explain the history behind lobsters.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Consider The Lobster

1182 Words | 5 Pages

He goes into taxonomy explaining that lobsters are crustacean due to their stalked eyes, gills on their legs, and antennae (Wallace, 2004, p. 1). He also breaks down the word lobster, and says that the word is “a corrupt form of the Latin word for locust combined with the Old English loppe, which meant spider” (Wallace, 2004, p. 1). He goes on to say that “lobsters are basically giant sea-insects”, which are “garbage men of the sea, eaters of dead stuff… and sometimes each other” (Wallace, 2004, p.1). Wallace later writes, “… in the 1800, lobster was literally low-class food, eaten only by the poor and institutionalized… some colonies had laws against feeding lobsters to inmates more than once a week because it was thought to be cruel and unusual, like making people eat rats… now, of course, lobster is posh, a delicacy” (Wallace, 2004, p.2). By writing this he makes his audience think of what they are eating, and why it became such an elegant dish over time.

Read More

Ethical Weight: The Story Of Henrietta Lacks

888 Words | 4 Pages

The story of Henrietta Lacks is one of great ethical weight. I believe that no one sought out the consent or permission of the use of Henrietta Lack’s cells from herself and her family because of the breakthrough that they would make in the medical field. I believe the researchers and doctors felt that by obtaining these live cells, they could be helping millions and did not really think to the extent of asking for permission. They most likely had a vision for the use of these cells and asking for the permission from the patient themselves or even their families wasn't a thought that came to mind. Furthermore, during the time period in which the medical field was in at the time of the obtaining of Henrietta’s cells, there were no laws or set

Read More

Consider The Lobster By David Foster Wallace Summary

686 Words | 3 Pages

He then goes on to prove that wrong by discussing how lobsters exhibit preference and graphically paints the picture of what exactly happens when you boil a lobster alive, speaking on the way lobsters attempt to escape the boiling water as you or I would do. For the remainder of this writing Wallace just continues to discuss the ethics behind eating lobster. He ends the paper on a very discomforting note finishing off by just saying that it’s best to stop the public discussion there, pointing out that there are limits to what even interested persons can ask of each

Read More

Summary Of Consider The Lobster

460 Words | 2 Pages

He first takes us back to the early years of 1800s when the lobster was low-class food and it was also cruel to make someone eat such food. He vividly compares lobster being bad as if men were eating rats. We are then brought back to present when lobster is now a delicacy and now being associated to steak. While all the events are taking place the writer continually uses rhetorical strategies and detailed revealing information which drives the readers to reconsider consumption of a lobster. Wallace does an amount of research which he makes use of metaphors to explains the livelihood of the inhumanities of the delicious lobster.

Read More

An Analysis Of David Wallace's 'Consider The Lobster'

1736 Words | 7 Pages

Likewise, he demonstrates his discomfort about society’s acceptance of lobster’s pain and dismissal of their essence. However, in order to understand Wallace’s real intention in the essay, it is necessary to know his perspective towards modern society. By reading the Incarnation of Burned Children, it is possible to relate the society issues displayed, with considering the Lobster issues. The inability of lobsters, or the child, to communicate their pain of our careless acts is what disturbs Wallace. Therefore, he displays different examples to persuade the readers that society’s morality is corrupted and that the whole industry of boiling lobsters alive is accepted under a false premise that some animals are not deserving of protection, or are not ‘highly developed’ to feel pain.

Read More

Eugenics Rough Draft Essay

700 Words | 3 Pages

Research Paper Rough Draft- Eugenics The amazing thing about the world today is the rapidly changing society, and the contemporary technology. Something that scientist have been working to perfect for many years is the modernization of eugenics. It is changing the way people are born by selecting specific traits for an individual to be smarter, stronger, more attractive and many other traits. Many parents of the new generation are willing to try the science of eugenics for their child to be customized to them.

Read More

Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis

782 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Is Hunting Moral?'

813 Words | 4 Pages

While returning to his first arguments about how critics often argue that hunting is immoral because it requires intentionally inflicting harm on innocent creatures. Even people who are not comfortable should acknowledge that many animals have the capacity to suffer. If it is wrong to inflict unwanted pain or death on an animal, then it is wrong to hunt. Today it is hard to argue that human hunting is strictly necessary in the same way that hunting is necessary for animals. The objection from necessary harm holds that hunting is morally permissible only if it is necessary for the hunter’s survival.

Read More

H. G. Moreau Analysis

1137 Words | 5 Pages

Humans give animals less moral consideration, than other humans because they believe that animals are lower on the totem pole. This is anthropocentrism because the human is ranking themselves as the most important living creature, and this unhealthy thought process leads to destruction and

Read More

Human Condition In Brave New World

702 Words | 3 Pages

The re-establishing of templates for which humans are to live by and the rebranding and repackaging of the human animal being which brings about the natural psychological, societal and political outcomes which rejects that which is 'cast' as the differing other as this social psychology set in motion that which has been destructively and fatally repeated throughout history. The problem with humanity's inability to deal with the differing other is investigated as this fatal flaw results in the oppression and the obliteration of ‘the differing other' which is deemed inferior by the setting of such restricted standards which creates a cold war of societal disparity. The key goal in its ambition is to control humanity with this psychological template which has its basis on the concepts of humanism and individualism exaggerated as it creates a hollow self serving but overly controlled vacant society numbed out by pleasure seeking, status and materialism within this societal monopoly as it uses the guise of 'culture' as a way to create the delusion of the human animal being as 'supernatural' and therefore 'superior'. We live in a world where ‘Animals’ have no history yet we as humans never cease to reconfigure our societies and our narcissistic identities, and in this regard we investigate humanity's sense of supreme ontological entitlement in their behaviour

Read More

Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

1170 Words | 5 Pages

In human history, a number of oppressed groups have campaigned for equality, demanding for an expansion on the moral view of life, and to be treated fairly in the eye of consideration. This means that when the matter concerns this group, their voices are heard, and treated with value, and consideration. Where this equality is not determined by an assembly of facts like that group’s collective intelligence level, the colour of their skin, or the physical strength of their bodies. This is what Peter Singer brings up in his essay: “All Animals are Equal”, that non-human animals should have equal consideration with humans when matters concern them. Going into a specific set of non-human animals known as primates, I argue that primates should have some of the fundamental rights and equal consideration that are given to humans.

Read More

Peter Singer's Argument Against Animal Rights

2076 Words | 9 Pages

As humans, the reason why it is ethical to kill other species is based on protecting humans, being happy, and the fact that humans are more intelligent. When we experiment on other species we sacrifice an innocent animal to benefit humanity, yet we wouldn’t experiment on another human because it is unethical. For example, in World War II, specifically the Holocaust, people were

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

1421 Words | 6 Pages

Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Animal Abuse

1381 Words | 6 Pages

Animal Cruelty Have you ever wondered how much atrocious animal treatments are occurring around the world? The average number of animal abuse cases reported in the media each year is 1,920 according to a study conducted this year by Statistic Brain Research Institute. Moreover, a lot of animals struggle around the globe because they are often beaten, neglected and hunted, which forces them to fight for survival. Helpless animals continue to be exploited by humans and are still constantly being robbed of their lives. Thus, animal cruelty is the killing, exploiting and neglecting the needs of animals that are causing extinction and nonessential suffering.

Read More

More about David Foster Wallace's Essay: Ethics And The New Genetics

Open Document