According to David Hume, is it possible for the assertion “Squares have four sides” to be certain and, if so, exactly how and why? “Squares have four sides” can only be certain through induction. In order for it to be deductive, “squares” would have to be the same as “four sides” and vice versa, which it is not. It is inductive because through sensory perception you can see four lines connected to form the sides of a square. According to David Hume, is it possible for the assertion “My hand hurts” to be certain and, if so, exactly how and why? According to Hume, this assertion is true through induction. This is true because through sensory perception an individual can feel pain radiating from their hands, but finding the cause of the pain is nonsensical. Hume believed that …show more content…
“Murder is evil” is not certain, it is nonsense because it cannot be proven through deduction or induction and it’s an opinion. It is not deductive because murder is not the same as evil and evil is not the same as murder. It is not inductive because evil cannot be seen, heard, tasted, smelled, or touched. This statement describes your emotions. What you’d be trying to say is that murder makes you feel sad and you don’t want it to happen to yourself. This is nonsensical. According to Immanuel Kant, is it possible for the assertion “Squares have four sides” to be certain and, if so, exactly how and why? According to Kant, this assertion can only be made certain using induction by understanding the intuition of space not through deduction. It isn’t deductive because squares are not the same as four sides and vice versa. He said that people are born understanding space, which allows them to connect four lines together using space to form a square. According to Immanuel Kant, is it possible for the assertion “My hand hurts” to be certain and, if so, exactly how and