ipl-logo

David Weirob's Theodicy

579 Words3 Pages

The term theodicy in general relates to an effort in expounding why the Supreme Being has created several instances of evil and hurt yet He is good. This mode of occurrence is founded on the basis of offering a free will to the human beings. The theodicy model rotates around the knowing that the whole world has lots of free beings, however it is as well laced with major occurrences of annihilation, violence, besides anguish that massively contradicts the very reason of humanity and life. As Perry (30) observes, Weirob has an observation that the Supreme Being has a knowledge status that is likened to a special occurrence. Weirob arguments and statements refer to a situation that paints a picture that God’s familiarity is an exceptional case. …show more content…

In this regard, Weirob extensively highlights the wide ranging argument that if God is believed to be all-seeing, doesn’t He recognize that an individual will make a selection when there exist numerous alternatives? Weirob’s view of God’s knowledge being an exceptional situation stems from the understanding that He created people, and He knew what those individuals would do. Weirob thinks that the Supreme Being does not however escape from the various responsibilities for the significance and results of what an individual usually do. The significance and prominence of Weirob in showcasing that God’s knowledge involves an exceptional case that estimates the various variations linking anything that exists in addition to the existence of the Supreme Being. In general terms, everything must have been created by the Supreme Being (Perry

Show More
Related
921 Words | 4 Pages

He argues that if God is perfectly moral, then he must always act in accordance with the moral law, even if this means causing suffering. However, if God is perfectly loving, then he must always act in the best interests of his creation, even if this means breaking the moral law. Rutledge concludes that we must choose between a God who is perfectly moral and a God who is perfectly loving. Rutledge's argument is thought-provoking and challenging. He raises important questions about the nature of God and the relationship between morality and love.

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

“The Problem of Evil” by Peter van Inwagen, is a series of lectures that that presents van Inwagen’s various responses to problem of evil. In this essay, I will present “the local problem of evil” (from chapter 6 of the book), the solution van Inwagen proposes for this problem, and my critique of his solution. “The local problem of evil,” according to van Inwagen, is the hypothetical response an atheist would have towards van Inwagen’s solution of “the global problem of evil” which is, “If god existed, then why is there so much evil in the world?” The argument of “the local problem of evil” is “If god existed then why are there specific horrors that occur in the world, like children dying in a horrific car crash?” The argument that is drawn

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

1. “‘The ancient teachers of this science,’ said he, ‘promised impossibilities, and performed nothing. The modern masters promise very little they know that metals cannot be transmuted, and that the elixir of life is a chimera. But these philosophers, whose hands seem only made to dabble in dirt, and their eyes to pore over the microscope or crucible, have indeed performed miracles” (74). —The word “he” refers to M. Waldman, a man who the narrator refers to as “short” and his voice as “sweetest I ever heard”.

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

An example of these beliefs was Josiah Royce, who would question the existence of evil and why god would allow evil to exist, an idea that became known as theodicy. An Royce says “For consider. A suffers ill. B sees A suffering. Can B, the onlooker, help his suffering neighbor, A?

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

The use of God as a shield works on believers, but not on nonbelievers. The question “why bad things happening to good people” still cannot be answered for the nonbelievers, a common critique of religion itself. Regardless of the problem of theodicy, however, religion has worked really well to create and maintain the reality. Berger explains that it is because religion legitimates effectively. “Religion has been the historically most widespread and effective instrumentality of legitimation….

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

In theory, he thinks that if God exists then evil should not, but it does. So he creates and argues a theodicy to show that God and evil can exist at the same time. He comes up with the “Free Will Theodicy” which states that humans are the cause of evil, not God. The Free Will Theodicy discusses two kinds of evil: moral evil and natural evil.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

A common questioning of a higher power beyond the physical realm lingers in society: Who and what is God?. However, many of these theological questions cannot be answered until we, of course, die. Due to human’s innate curiosity to understand the forces beyond their own, especially in terms of religion, humans find their own reasons to believe in God in the process of discovery. Religion is a sense of belief and worship to praise a higher power (God), and it provides a guide for human beings to have the opportunity to come together and live as one image of God’s children. “Imagine There’s No Heaven” is an article in which Salman Rushdie, the author, presents an atheistic view where religion is pointless, and a higher being is non-existent.

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

Chapter 3: Old Testament Materials for a Relational View of Providence Involving Risk (Agreement with the Major Themes of Scripture) 3.1 The Introduction. The author opens the discussion by telling us that many theologians have developed a “risk-free” model of providence that demonstrates that they believe that God exercises meticulous providential control — his creatures are simply acted upon. The author also states that this view is usually supported by a number of Scriptures (Ps 47:7-8; Is 29:16; Jer 18:1-6; Rom 9:21; Mt 5:45 and Mt 10:29). However, in this section, the author moves to prove that the Old Testament provides us with much material to confirm that God is capable of and has been involved in a relationship with his creation that involves "give-and-take", insomuch that it is understood that He does take risk as it relates to the fulfillment of his goal for his divine providence. 3.2 The Creation and Its Divinely Established

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

The existence of God has been presented by a multitude of philosophers. However, this has led to profound criticism and arguments of God’s inexistence. The strongest argument in contradiction to God’s existence is the Problem of Evil, presented by J.L Mackie. In this paper, I aim to describe the problem of evil, analyse the objection of the Paradox of Omnipotence and provide rebuttals to this objection. Thus, highlighting my support for Mackie’s Problem of evil.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

Trinity, it is a word that never appear in the whole Bible, non-also appear that the Three are one. Neither appears in the New Testament (NT). But it is in the whole context of the NT that we can understand the oneness of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Deut 6.4 says that God is the only one, Jesus, all the time, showed He was God (Mk 2.1-12) and the gospel of John presents Him as the incarnated God (Jn 1.1-18)

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

The German mathematician and philosopher Gottfried Leibniz coined the term "theodicy" in 1710 in his work Theodicies. Other philosophers have suggested that theodicy is a modern discipline because deities in the ancient world were often imperfect. Theodicy is the answer to the question why God permits evil. (Wikipedia, 2015) “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things” Isaiah 45:7

Read More
1375 Words | 6 Pages

This is claimed to be an error in the interpretation of the means of the Peripatetics. The problem is in the human definition of knowledge, which is not applicable to God, as “His Knowledge transcends qualification as ‘universal’ or ‘particular’” (Averroes 317). Rather, God’s knowledge is beyond our full understanding. This is because of the fundamental difference between the origins of human knowledge, which is the observation of what has happened, called “effect” by Averroes.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

However, Boethius’s views on God’s knowledge more strongly illustrate this point because they place a greater distinction between God’s knowledge and our will, by placing God outside of the temporal world, changing the conception of foreknowledge. Both theories are successful in accounting for human free will and the excellence of God, blending the two idea to allow human beings to determine their own live within the space provided by the all powerful

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

This means going through life when faced with decisions, He does interfere or enforce a predisposed plan upon an individual. Reasoning for this stems from personal everyday actions. Upon waking up, there are many decisions that can be made, all of which can slightly alter the future, yet its feels as though there is no divine power at work when making one of these decisions. Individuals go through mental monologues to come to a decision based on the facts and opportunities presented with them. Saint Augustine claims the very same thing in Book V of the text when he says, “that God knows all things before they happen; yet, we act by choice in all those things where we feel and know that we cannot act otherwise than willingly.”

Read More

More about David Weirob's Theodicy

Related Topics

Open Document