Summary Of A Compensatory Response To The Problem Of Evil Beaty

921 Words4 Pages

Beaty, Michael Douglas. “A Compensatory Response to the Problem of Evil: Revisited.”
Religions, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2023, p. 35. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010035

Beaty argues that the problem of evil can be solved by appealing to the concept of compensatory providence. He argues that God compensates for the evil that people suffer in this life by giving them rewards in the afterlife. Beaty's argument is based on the idea that God is just and merciful, and that he would not allow his creatures to suffer without compensating them in some way. Beaty's argument is creative and thought-provoking. He provides a new way of thinking about the problem of evil, and he offers a possible solution that is both plausible and consistent with traditional Christian beliefs. However, Beaty's argument is also controversial. Some people may argue that it is not fair for God to compensate for evil in the afterlife, when the people who suffer have already experienced the evil in this life.
Effingham, Nikk. “Using Wormholes to Solve the Problem of Evil.” TheoLogica, vol. 5, no. 1,
Jan. 2021, pp. …show more content…

He argues that if God is perfectly moral, then he must always act in accordance with the moral law, even if this means causing suffering. However, if God is perfectly loving, then he must always act in the best interests of his creation, even if this means breaking the moral law. Rutledge concludes that we must choose between a God who is perfectly moral and a God who is perfectly loving. Rutledge's argument is thought-provoking and challenging. He raises important questions about the nature of God and the relationship between morality and love. However, his argument is also controversial. Some people may argue that it is possible for God to be both perfectly moral and perfectly loving, even if this means that he sometimes has to act in ways that seem

More about Summary Of A Compensatory Response To The Problem Of Evil Beaty