Dbq Essay On Standing Rock Culture

Colonization established genocide and displacement as building blocks for the political and economic platforms of this country, but also generated ideologies which discredited indigenous ways of life. Ideologies such as morals, norms, political and economic reasoning were supported through state institutions, which gave a standard of perception in these realms of thinking and marginalized those outside the norm. Feminist theory calls for equity amongst gender and sexuality, yet indigenous theory reclaims liberation through resisting colonial policies and reconstructing narratives for the benefit of mother earth rather than profit and control. The statement of principles on Standing Rock Culture highlights a decolonial narrative though challenging

Decentering European views would be to critique the liberal ideology rooted in mainstream feminism, which internalizes individual freedoms, values of property and ignores structural change. According to the statement on camp culture, platforming and centering indigenous views and practices is vital, “Whiteness and Christian dominance, which are the basis of US settler identity, are built on perfectionism, superiority, purity, competition, individualism, binaries, and suppressed emotion” (Solidariteam, Document). Indigenous theory critiques the white liberal narrative of feminism because it erases intersecting forces such as class, race, and fails to dismantle colonial powers that have manifested through institutions, which in return oppress communities, internalizing heteropatriarchy, and justify erasure. The domination of white feminism perpetuates the agenda of liberal society that protects property, and

Indigenous people grow and learn through collective work and a elitist society disregards this kind of knowledge and value learning through competition and standardized forms, in order to create a market off learning and teaching. In an academic-based society, perception is rooted in its value of credentials. This supports the mainstream work of liberal feminism, in which they rely on the nonprofit sector or state services to implement change, instead of using the master's tools to claim equality. Hall notes, “Reconstructing tradition and memory is a vital element of indigenous survival, and there is nothing simple or one-dimensional about the process of reconstruction” (Hall 202). Liberal forms of justice have managed to commodify social change, whereas it becomes a privilege and inaccessible to all. The nonprofit sector shadows the repressive behavior of the government, whereas it professionalized social movements in order to minimize the importance of mass-based grassroots organizing. It normalizes this individualist narrative, which allows those with privilege to build a platform to run the show. Liberal ideologies have denounced social change, in a way that perpetuates non-transformative solutions to generate competition within the fight for liberation, and create structural dependences on the repressive state. Historically, most forms of social