The three documents given to us to read show three different but similar ideas of how people should carry themselves within society. The Declaration of Independence was the act of thirteen different colonies declaring their independence from Britain created in 1776. The Declaration of the Rights of Man was written during the French Revolution in 1779 talking about what men deserved as a form of freedom. This had its own controversy because it was written by using the words man and himself as to exclude women. This brings up the last document called the Rights of the Women and Female Citizen which was created in 1791. This was a direct response to the Rights of Man by Olympe de Gouges who ended up being executed for her attempt at calling out the document. This was a very early showing of feminism and women becoming activists for what they believed was right. All these documents show a similar sign of wanting freedom. The states seem to show more of a unity because it wasn’t just one state calling for help. This is shown by the line, “The history of the present King of …show more content…
We get this in the first declaration that says, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.” (DRM 1789) It seems to categorize men by themselves and then everyone else is considered a citizen. This view is something that is also comparable to Adam Smiths because it talks more about men and their rights. There is nothing here to talk about the work men do like Smiths views of the market. This is more about the rights men have publicly over everyone else and their duties. This is also shown in the preamble when it says, “believing that the ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities” (DRM 1789) This declaration was responded to in the Declaration of the Rights of Women and the Female