Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assignment introduction to intentional torts
Assignment introduction to intentional torts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assignment introduction to intentional torts
Assignment introduction to intentional torts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine the perfect image of justice, most people will see a judge, a jury or even a police. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird the image of justice is Atticus Finch. He was the first in the Finch line to leave Finch’s Landing and pursue the study of Law. In order for him to study law, he would have to be intelligent so he could retain the information that was taught to him. Not only is he intelligent, he is also very brave.
In the case of Jack Penneyless, I believe Jack will be indicted for the pre-meditated murder of his ex-wife. To be found guilty of a criminal offense, a person must have intent, Mens Rea, the intent can be specific or general and fall under four separate states of mind, and the person must also commit the guilty act, Actus Reus, which constitutes the crime they are charge with. Jack blamed Nina for his downfall and began conspiring to murder her. He discovered the times his wife golfed and plotted to kill her with a golf swing. According to the facts, Jack was followed Nina to the golf course, he did not just happen to be in the vicinity and cause a freak accident, he also did not give a proper warning when he stuck the ball, all
In “Words on Trial,” Jack Hitt’s main argument addresses the following question: can linguists solve crimes that the police, or the court cannot. Moreover, this essay focuses on cases where the evidence presented was not examined correctly and have led to, in some cases, drastically disparate results compared to what the police presented as evidence. The essay starts off with an exhibit source, which is broken down throughout. Although “forensics” (forensic scientists) were not able to link any DNA to the crime (the murder of his wife and kids), experts were able to link him to a few circumstances of the case. Hitt agrees with this when he says, “At the trial, experts could show that some of the threatening e-mails had been sent from Coleman’s
Atticus decides to take the case in defending a black person, something nobody in the town would have done. Most of the residents of Maycomb do not believe in equality and have hatred towards black people. If an African-American is charged for committing a crime, he is automatically believed to be guilty because of their skin color. Atticus says, “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view” (39). To clarify, Atticus took the case because he believes there is a chance of Tom being innocent.
Due to the setting of To Kill a Mockingbird, the outcome of Tom Robinson's trial is likely to be Tom ruled guilty. One piece of evidence to support a guilty verdict is the fact that Tom Robinson is black and the Ewells are white. In the 1930's, if a black man was accused of raping a white woman, a guilty verdict and the death penalty was the most common outcome. Earlier on in the story, Atticus states that they had already lost due to the color of Tom's skin.
Someone who lied or insulted another person had to pay a considerable fine. A man in Virginia vehemently ridiculed the governor. He had his tongue pierced, and then the authorities banished him from the neighborhood. The hostile colonists aimed for criminal punishments to mortify the offenders. Instead of placing convicts in jail, they would often be whipped publicly or have the name of the offense burned onto one of their hands.
“You did the crime, now you do the time,” this age old adage is currently being used to describe Tom Robinson and the case against him; however, Tom will no longer serve time, considering that police officers murdered him when he attempted to flee from prison. A legion of people believes that Tom Robinson’s actions ultimately led to his demise, and that he is just another worthless human. In actuality, the father of the accuser, Bob Ewell, was the cause of Tom’s death. Maycomb’s most reclusive citizen saw an opportunity to capitalize on the town’s racist nature, and gain a few seconds in the limelight. Furthermore, this newly found fame would provide a stark difference from his everyday life of being the town’s most hated resident, and hopefully
“Atticus, he was real nice.” “Most people are, Scout, when you finally see them.” This is perhaps one of the strongest issues brought up in the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird. The hundreds of pages in this novel come together to form an intricate web of incontestable evidence pointing towards the fact the humans come, see, and conquer. They do not look behind, or further to see the real thing, the real thing that they just destroyed to gain for themselves power and supremacy.
All evidence pointed to Mr. Ewell as the offender, a man who spends all his money on whiskey and lets his children cry from starvation. While, Tom Robinson is a good person, with a good job and a good family but with a bad, bad skin color. And that's the important factor. The judge, jury, both lawyers, practically the entire town knew that Tom was innocent.
The first incident was when Mr. Granger threatened them because they had been shopping at Vicksburg as a form of protest. He threatened that if they kept on shopping at Vicksburg, he would try to do something that could hurt them or the land. The second
Injustice is found in the town of Maycomb during Tom’s court case. He is brought before court accused of committing an appalling crime, even though clear evidence and facts have been
another youth taunted him. Bobo had to fire or fall back. He entered the store, alone, stopped at the candy case. Carolyn was behind the counter, Bobo in front.
The testimonies reveal how deep-rooted the racism within Maycomb runs, as it is present even in court rulings and how casually present it is. The court is taking place, and the order of prosecutor’s witnesses who are: Mr. Heck Tate, the sheriff; Mr. Bob Ewell, Mayella’s father; and Mayella Ewell, the one who is accusing Tom Robinson of raping her. When it’s Mr. Ewell’s turn to speak, he does so with many racial slurs and slang embedded in his accusations. When relaying what he saw to the jury, he points at Tom and yells “―I seen that black n*gger yonder ruttin’ on my Mayella!” Mr. Ewell, who, although, has never been a part of a court case or viewed one, doesn’t truly care, or notice, that so far into the formal case, not one person has used racial slang to talk about Tom, and uses the term n*gger quite casually.
(Pg 276) A person that has control on the outcome didn’t even stand up to help the trial of Tom Robinson. This unjust area is completely dependent to the racial thoughts in Maycomb. Not only that but black people aren’t welcomed into this area due to the possible punishment that could happen to them. They could be held accountable for something they didn’t even do.
Later on in the story, the Hit Man “wastes” a waitress for bringing him a plate of food that contained peas. These statements confirm some of the dysfunctional behavior the Hit Man has as well as another example of displacement. The Hit Man takes something as simple as his dislike of a food and turns it into a murder based on nearly nothing. The Hit Man is likely quick to kill because he believes he has no other way of address his deep core issues of displacement and