ipl-logo

Define Scientific Method

1257 Words6 Pages

Defining the Scientific Method and Its 5 Renowned Steps

As human being, we ritually inquire about an abundance of things, big and small. A lot of us are extremely curious when it comes to issues dealing with our planet, the impact that we have on it, the challenges that it face such as pollution or climate change, and how it inedibly affects us. Other individuals may inquire about our society and its various obstacles such as starvation, homelessness, job availability, crime rates, political factors, inequalities and privileges, and several others. These are the types of intriguing topics that generally require the need for careful research and observation. These topics and several others can be analyzed and better perceived by using the …show more content…

A good hypothesis is not only testable, but it also can be used to make a predictions on future observations by other researchers. The fourth step of the scientific method involves two parts. The first part of this step is to select a research design. A research design is a detailed plan or method for obtaining data scientifically, and it purpose is to assist researchers in effectively coordinating, collecting, and analyzing data (McGraw-Hill, 2018). The choosing and preparation of your research design is a critical factor of the scientific method because it allows you to test your hypothesis, analyze your data, and either satisfy or contradict your research objective. There are different research designs to consider when attempting to obtain data, so you should carefully choose a design that would grant you the most trustworthy and impartial results. Surveys, ethnographic research, experiments, and the use of existing resources are a few examples you could choose from. After choosing the best possible research design, you can proceed to the second part of this step, collect and analyze data. Your research should always include data so you can determine if the experiment was effective. You …show more content…

You should also notate whether or not your experiment supported your hypothesis. In your conclusion, you should also state how the dependent variable was effected by the independent variable and to what extent. You should document any and all findings from your research. Sometimes, your predicted hypothesis may not be support. If your hypothesis was not supported, you should communicate your results from the experiment and then go back and consider formulating a new hypothesis including the new knowledge that you’ve just gained. If your hypothesis was supported, you should still go back and repeat the experiment and see if you could duplicate the process and results. This helps us to show reliability and validity in our experimental research. The scientific method is an extremely powerful and recognized tool that helps researchers to solve problems and determine answers to questions in a logical and unbiased format. It provides a step-by-step, guide to help us work through problems and achieve results. It provides an objective, standardized approach to conducting experiments and, in doing so, improves their results. By using the scientific method, researcher can feel confident that they

Show More
Related
581 Words | 3 Pages

Scientific research is methodical. Created from a desire to make the unknown known, the “scientific method” was created in the 15th century based on common sense. As Barry analysis the scientific process, he says that the unknown must be made into a tool, even against one’s own ideas and beliefs. However, that concept is tenuous, so Barry uses logical situations to present the idea.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

The scientific method is paramount to scientists and their studies. Barry affirms, “Ultimately a scientist

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

c. What is the research question or hypothesis? a. My hypothesis is that children who are exposed or given the opportunity to use these devices or are exposed to these devices at a young age will have or obtain more knowledge than a child who are not. d. What sort of research design are you proposing? (e.g. correlational, descriptive observational, experimental, etc.)

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, the characteristics of the scientific method are far from few. Most distinctly, science deals with the uncertainty of the unknown, attempting to make it known. Though complicated, Barry explains his beliefs on the scientific method with strong diction to show the formality of science, rhetorical questions to show the uncertainty, and logos to show the intellect of science. His rhetorical strategies help the audience understand the plethora of characteristics in the realm of

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The scientific method is a term that can be understood basically in two ways, one is, experiments are done in controlled laboratories, or a way of knowing that can embrace all the scientific methods. The scientific method has six steps which include; make an observation, ask a question, form a hypothesis, and conduct an experiment, analyze the data, and draw a conclusion. Data is the definition which is observed and there is three board categories of data that can be observed: inanimate objects; living things, including people; and events or interactions among people and objects. In the natural science world this is implemented in many forms, for example: biological data might contain some of the following: classifications; sequence data, such as those connected with the DNA of numerous species, have developed enormously with the expansion of automated sequencing

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

This is called the scientific method and has been used not only in fields of science but also in politics and government. Document three is a model of the scientific method from 1999. The model consists of the 7 steps of this process. One: state the problem, two: collect information, three: form a hypothesis, four: experiment, five: record and analyze data, six: state a conclusion, seven: repeat the steps. The method was built using logic and reason to get from one step to the next.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

The chapter begins by answering the question, “What is Science?” According to the text, science is a process of studying the world through systematic observation and experimentation. The difference between science and every day observations are science is dependable on objectivity, or facts, rather than subjectivity, or personal viewpoints. Secondly, scientist use systematic observations in contrast with hit or miss observation because hit or miss observation is used only to report the findings of what is happening around us, not facts to include the rest of the world. Lastly, evidence that is observable and repeatable is more dependable for scientist to work with as opposed to everyday observations that disregard evidence.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

What essential characteristics distinguish a true experiment from other research designs? True experimental designs separate themselves from other research designs in two ways. First, the utilize a baseline test or something of the equivalent to compare the final research results with (Cooper & Schindler, 2014, p. 204). When a research or an experiment is conducted there needs to be data collected prior to conducting the research or test so that a comparison can be made to determine or validate the research.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

2) Experiments - An experimental evidence is a great method to support an idea because you control variables, determine cause-and-effect relationships, identify relationships between objects and humans and can redo the experiments with the same or greater level of efficiency. For instance, forensic experiments can help the police track down a criminal. In like manner, forensic scientists can determine the particular gun the criminal used by examining the fired bullets and maybe even the place it was bought. Experiments can give a strong justification for a

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout antiquity and trial, many concepts, hypotheses, and theories have been deliberated; some were discredited, while evidence based science concepts remained. Science rightly progressed in the 17th century through systemic observation, trial, and theory analysis. The scientific method created a substantial foundation for establishing accepted scientific principles, fundamental hypotheses, which are based on limited research that through experiment and validation establish an accepted scientific theory (Larsen 2016). Civilization has achieved knowledge and growth through a methodical empirical approach, practical observation and research.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

In current times, hypotheses are now accepted throughout the world. Scientist think of new ideas in all kinds of ways, and these hypotheses become a sort of initial stage of scientific inquiry. Hypotheses guide scientist to performing different observations and experiments that can lead them to a universal truth in the world. In order to be accepted as hypothesis, it must

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Scientific method looks in depth to a persons psychological decision making. It study's a persons environmental, behaviour, past history and produces evidence to give a reason to somes psychological profile. The website Boundless.com give its reason to why the scientific method is so critical in psychology as "Compared to chemistry, physics, and other "natural sciences," psychology has long been considered one of the "social sciences" because of the subjective nature of the things it seeks to study" This is reflected by the process that psychologist use in the study. Psychologist draw up a hypothesis to test their theory and draw up a conclusion to their observations. Due to the in depth work and study that is aligned to psychology this makes the scientific method so critical to their

Read More
1410 Words | 6 Pages

A number of basic standards for determining a body of knowledge, methodology, or practice are widely agreed upon by scientists. One of the basic notion is that all experimental results should be reproducible, and able to be verified by other individuals.[13] This standard aim to ensure experiments can be measurably reproduced under the same conditions, allowing further investigation to characterize whether a hypothesis or theory related to given phenomena is valid and reliable. Philosopher Karl Popper (?) in one of his project attempted to draw the line between science and pseudo-science.

Read More
1578 Words | 7 Pages

Even if it might provide us incorrect data or if there was a problem in the process of application, this can later be opted out and people will know what is not right and hence could search for alternative methods. Moreover, the field of Natural sciences has been based on paradigm shifts. Our knowledge of what was previously regarded as the absolute truth has been turned out to be false several times and has been replaced by relatively “more perfect” knowledge. Therefore, even if the results obtained through application could lead to results that is not in accordance with people’s expectation, this, in the long term, can possibly lead to progression of knowledge that is much closer to the absolute truth and hence the extrinsic value of knowledge will increase through

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

The scientific method is an approach used by psychologists and researchers who want to have a systematic and objective way of recording and understanding behaviour and any other topic that may be of interest. It is comprised of four main steps that will be discussed below, along with my example research situation. Before a researcher can dive into doing research, s/he must identify a question of interest. The researcher might make an observation of some strange phenomena or even everyday behaviour that begs for an explanation. It might be something they saw, were told or read from previous literature or findings.

Read More

More about Define Scientific Method

Related Topics

Open Document