Democracy Vs Madisonian Democracy

1295 Words6 Pages

Democracy has been considered an important aspect of what makes America a land of liberty and rights. There are different types of democracy such as Majoritarian or Participatory, and a Madisonian Democracy. The differences in these types of democracies changes the entire idea of what is considered important to the government and which people, if not all of the people will be represented fairly and honorably. There have not always be rights for all people and even now this is not necessarily the case. The Civil Rights Movement is a great example of the struggle that groups have, even though there is supposed to be a trustworthy democracy. There has been important cases and events in the civil rights movement that have shown progress, but like …show more content…

The focus is to help the minorities. Checks are placed on majoritarian power in order to lower the possibility of abuses of power and limits individual power in government. Madison was opposed to autocracy and wanted the powers of the government to be divided into three separate branches including the executive, judicial, and legislative. This was so that there would be equal power amongst the branches and one branch would not be able to gain more power over the others. They would have to work together in order to be successful, but could also be independent from one another. He did not want the risk of having tyanny to occur because of the minority or majority. He illustrated these important points in the Federalist Papers number fifty-one and ten. The purpose of Federalist paper number fifty-one is to inform the reader of protection created by the convention to preserve the three separate branches of power in the government and to protect the rights of people. He discusses that human nature makes people self-interested and if this self-interest occurred in the majorities, it would be dangerous. You need to …show more content…

The civil rights are rights that are designed for freedom of individuals from discrimination. The equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment explains these rights. The case of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 created the opportunity to use the Fourteenth Amendment to change many characteristics of state politics. It was a landmark Supreme Court case, which ruled that “separate but equal” was unconstitutional, specifically separate public schools for white and black student. President Dwight Eisenhower was also responsible for furthering the cause of the civil rights by using the National Guard to enforce the ruling of Brown v. Board of Education. However, only public schools were desegregated and there was still segregation. After this decision the Civil Rights Movement pursued the social movement strategy, which included non-violent protests and demonstrations. For example, Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Greensboro “sit-ins” in North Carolina, and the Freedom Riders. The result was Presidential Action to protect the “Rule of Law” and eventually the Congressional Civil Rights Legislation. The 1964 Civil Rights Act, was passed by Congress, which outlawed discrimination based on color, religion, race, or sex. It ended unequal voter registration application requirements and racial segregation in public such as