Descartes And John Locke Research Paper

1328 Words6 Pages

For many years philosophers have asked the question UN agency am I? during this essay we are going to scrutinize the 2 most powerful philosophers of the seventeenth century. each Rene Descartes and John Locke try and make a case for what personality is and the way the mind and body area unit joined. Rene Descartes is typically thought-about the “father of contemporary philosophy” and was raised within the French aristocracy and educated at the Jesuit school of l. a. Fléche. John Locke spent his childhood within the English country. He schooled philosophy and also the classics at Oxford till he earned a medical degree and turned to drugs. The chief distinction between Descartes|mathematician|philosopher} and John Locke is that Descartes was …show more content…

Like philosopher, John Locke makes a distinction between the body, ``an extended solid substance, [and the soul,] ``an immaterial spirit ... a substance that thinks'' (Locke, 124). John Locke thinks that the self is each the mind and its body. in contrast to philosopher UN agency considers thought at a given moment, John Locke goes on to convey associate account of memory and explains identity (sameness of self) in terms of continuity of consciousness. John Locke aforesaid that self is unified by consciousness and consciousness is unified between mental states. He asked what makes Maine a similar person i used to be yesterday, last week or last year. What makes Maine, me? John Locke differs from philosopher in distinctive between the soul (a substance) and consciousness. it's our consciousness that we tend to decision our self, consciousness makes our …show more content…

No divine will build a private nothing, and still have the individual suppose. however on the far side that there's nothing in situ to recommend that others and things exist. they may be a thought of one’s imagination, everything one sense may simply a mental projection. though Rene Descartes’ methodology of inquiry and methodology of doubt is a motivating philosophical approach he was unable to prove something on the far side his own existence. there's no thanks to prove that my body exists. they may be a projection of my mind or associate illusion. philosopher proves his existence within the method that he's able to suppose and manufacture thought. That proves nothing regarding the body that i'm in, or the chemical fluctuations exciting neurons in my head manufacturing thought. To my current progress and intelligence there's no method on behalf of me to prove certainly that my body exists however no matter its realism I expertise pain if I harm my body, and happiness if I rest it. There area unit 2 potential outcomes: my body is real, however I even have no thanks to prove it nevertheless associated my body is an illusion, however I even have no thanks to prove it nevertheless. many meditations that were done by philosopher were merely not logical. His main