Descartes Pyrrhonian Skepticism

Although comparing both articles it is clear that Descartes does not refute the pyrrhonian skepticism. Sceptics believe that what is true is merely based on what we see, feel, smell and taste. In the same way, Descartes does not entirely rule out the idea of our senses explaining reality but focuses more on if our senses give us exact evidence. Sceptics believe that there is no truth just perception. What we consider to be real and existent is based solely of what we think. As a sceptic, you do not need to believe in anything. Consequently, sceptics tend to withhold judgement and live by appearances. They adapt to the view of others but refute their beliefs and yet still do not reject them. On the other hand, Descartes questions if what

Reason is usually not very informative to validate knowledge and is merely just a relation of ideas. Usually reason is specified to prove an opinion or judgement true or false. However, reason does not clarify if you do contain knowledge. Scepticism is the search for knowledge, but how can we attain knowledge if everyone has different perception. When a sceptic is confronted by a belief that is related to a previous belief then doubt will exist in both beliefs. Sceptics believe that there is no certainty in human knowledge. Just since something cannot be proven, does not necessarily mean that it is not known. In others words, any arguments that hold a claim to knowledge will always be contradicted by contrasting arguments. The uncertainty of reason being a foundation of knowledge can be maintained by a skeptic for multiple reasons. One reason being that reasons will never be adequate for one to prove he/she contains a specific knowledge. This is because a sceptic would articulate that there will by no means be complete evidence to confirm knowledge. Similarly, one reason can also have countless other reasons that will never come to a set conclusion. As a result, it is impossible to accomplish an authentic knowledge with absolute