ipl-logo

Civil Law Vs Criminal Law Essay

1054 Words5 Pages

1. Describe in detail the differences between civil law and criminal law.

• A civil case involves a dispute between two people, or parties, on a certain issue. One party sues the other, and the jury determines liability and the amount of damages. The court may order the party found at fault to pay money to the injured party or to fulfill an obligation, such as honoring a contract.

• Criminal law considers a crime an act against society rather than an individual. Therefore, the government brings legal action against a person for committing a crime. If found guilty, the defendant may have to pay a fine, serve time in jail or prison, or be placed on probation. The law and society view jail time, or incarceration, as the loss of one 's personal freedom and thus, a more severe penalty than a monetary fine.

2. …show more content…

For example, in a contract for the sale of a home, the buyer promises to pay the seller $200,000 in exchange for the seller 's promise to deliver title to the property.

9. Can a promise enforce a gratuitous promise at law? In equity? Describe why or why not.

A promise cannot force a gratuitous promise at law. A gratuitous promise is essentially a unilateral transaction going from one party to the other, not an exchange between the parties as consideration must be. In equity, promissory estoppel can be thought of as rather a “substitute” for consideration that sometimes can be used where actual consideration is not present and injustice would otherwise result.

10. Name and describe four types of contracts that are included in the Statute of Frauds.
1. Contracts Made in Consideration of Marriage – prerequisites prior to marriage must be in writing in order to be enforceable

2. Contracts Incapable of Being Performed within a Year from the Time They Are Made – time starts to run when the contract is made, not when it’s to be

Show More
Related
489 Words | 2 Pages

People, normally make lots of promises and most of the time they do not deliver the promise. When the oral promise is broken there is a breach of the promise. However, you can not legally enforce if you don’t have a proof of that promise. On the other hand, a written promise is a promise written in a document and signed. A written promise can be legally enforceable because there is a proof.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

When a person in the United States commits a crime they will be penalized for that said crime. The United States criminal justice system is the department established by the government to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate the law. The criminal justice system has allowed the government to lock away several people who have committed several crimes and who are a danger to society. With that being said, the criminal justice system also has some flaws. For instance, sometimes wrongfully convicted people get put in jail like in Adnan Syed’s case.

Read More
2011 Words | 9 Pages

In law that is not codified, this means that instead of writing down numerous details of specific parts of the law, the Common law system instead relies mainly on precedent in which the judiciary will render it’s judgment regarding a particular area of law based off of past decisions in cases with similar content (Cal-Berkeley). Another difference is the role the judge plays in a court case. In the Civil law system, the judge’s decision making has to be within the confines of the law meaning that regardless of who the judge is they have to render a ruling based off of what the law says which doesn’t allow for the judge’s personal interpretation of the law (Cal-Berkeley). Also, judges in the Civil law system are essentially in addition to being the judge, is also the investigator, jury, and prosecutor in a sense because they are the ones who files the charges against the party and in addition to presiding over the case they

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Mandatory sentencing began in October 27 1986 Reagan signed a law Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. Frontline writes that the law allocated funds to new prisons, drug education, and treatment. But its main result was to create mandatory minimum sentences. The harsh sentences on crack cocaine use disproportionately affect African-Americans April 22, 2014.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Sentencing for a crooked offenses can range from community service and probation, even leading up to the death penalty. There are things called the “three strikes” sentencing laws, state-specific guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, etc... Sentencing in the court system takes place straight after the misdemeanors, convictions, or if the defendant pleads guilty (Find Law, 2016). If the criminal cases are more miscellaneous, such as involving serious felonies, the sentencing judge will require the defense, probation department, and the prosecutors input. The judge will consider multiple factors determining a criminals sentence. He will consider if the offender has any criminal history, if the offender was the main accessory (which is someone who assists the main person that commits the crime), if the offender appearance is displayed well (as if they show remorse or regret), if anyone was injured or the crime was particularly likely to result into injury , or if the offender was cruel to a victim, destructive, etc... Judges in most cases have a clear mindset when determining a proper sentence.

Read More
1135 Words | 5 Pages

In this case the consequence of breaking the promise is better than keeping it. (Source A) In rule utilitarianism, the moral rightness or wrongness of an action depends on its conformity to an ideal set of rules, general guidelines, following of which one will maximize utility for every affected by the action. A rule utilitarian will not break their promise with their partner because breaking promises would be a violation of moral principle guidelines. Another example would be following the rule that cheating on test is considered wrong according to morality so you do not cheat on any tests.

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

Criminal Law vs. Tort Criminal Law Criminal law is the conduct of any wrongful action that threatens the safety ones property, health, and morality in intentional way by another. The act or action of harming and damaging another wrongfully with grudge and a malice intension to cause harm with no remorse. Endangering another person or place, persons welfare in any harmful or endangering another. An example of criminal law nurse physically abusing a patient who refuses to take his medication.

Read More
547 Words | 3 Pages

Criminal behaviour has always been an interest for psychologists, for they could never quite come to a conclusion between nature and nurture. Research concerning this topic has been organized for many years and due to the never ending debate, is still being conducted. I have decided to read and write about this myself, for I was genuinely curious about the matter and wanted to be a part of the research, as I felt responsible to do so. I believe that in order to stop something, it must be discussed and scrutinized. What effects do genes have on criminal behaviour, why do peer pressure and habitat influence a person to commit crimes and are men really more violent than women?

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

2) Forgiveness The Devine Mother searches your soul and reminds you of all kinds of acts, omissions, I was able to forgive others as I am not a malicious person but I could not forgive myself of past mistakes, I was led to read a book I had bought after I heard Bob Proctor give a talk about “Working with the Law” by Raymond Holliwell, on his Chapter on forgiveness I had the strangest feeling about my unforgiveness of myself, I was for days consumed with fear of past mistakes and I was terified, I spoke to my two oldest children about my fears and they thought I was being too harsh on my self. I was reminded by the Holy Spirit that unforgiveness of past mistakes has been the cause of my anger and inability to progress because I considered myself

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

I hold this position due to the fact that within a social contract their might be present individuals that are not capable of agreeing to or forming demands in the contract. For the sake of the argument I will refer to these individuals or parties, which come together in the social contract agreement, as the promisor, promisee, and beneficiary. The promisor is the individual/group who offers a promise that can be either agreed to or refused by the promisee. For example a husband offers his wife a day off by taking their son to a camping excursion. Contrary to the promisor, the promisee is at the receiving end of the bargain.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

As defined in the book, Introduction to Criminal Justice, a prosecutor is “an appointed or elected member of the practicing bar who is responsible for bringing the state’s case against the accused,” whom protects the civil rights of the criminal defendant in the process of trial. Hence, a prosecutor is the most powerful person in the Criminal Justice system because of the rurality of a case settling in court. Thus, there are three types of prosecutors, whom shares the goal and the burden of protecting the civil rights bestowed in a nondiscriminatory manner. The first type of prosecutor is in the federal system, the United States attorneys whose main purpose is to carry out justice unbiasedly in federal court, and is appointed by the president. The second type, the attorney general is the chief legal officer who is also a prosecutor of each state, including the United States.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

An agent is in dire need of money. He approaches a lender for a loan, while being aware that he will not pay it back; but also no one will grant him a loan except if he made a firm promise to pay it back at a given time. Being in such a juxtaposition, and wrestles with his conscience over the permissibility of such an action, i.e., whether his maxim can be universalised. However, if he resolves to make false promise, and if such maxim is to be the standard of human behaviour, then distrust will ensue as other persons will view promises as a sham. From this reasoning, it follows that his maxim cannot be universalised (422).

Read More
1939 Words | 8 Pages

As people became more individualized however beliefs and values would shift so the law needed to reflect the ideals and values of the society. Within David Garland’s chapter on punishment and social solidarity he recognises that punishment is not necessarily in place to correct behaviour but to keep society as a whole. While there is a correlation between punishment and criminal activity to keep society intact there has to be in a place a set of values within the legal system that force a kind of communality. People who enter the prison system are made examples of representing what a society values. It can be a person being imprisoned for life due to murder or for thievery within each society there are consequences for deviating from values.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

A contract is a bargain which two or more parties, which intend to create one or more legal responsibility between them in law entered into willingly with a lawful object. Thus, a contract may be formed when two or more parties each promise to perform or to refrain from performing a little action now or in the future. (Boston, T. 1779) What is more, contract law shows what promises or commitments our society believes should be legally binding. Similarly, Professor Arthur Corbin 's (1874–1967) famous first axiom of contract law is that the main purpose of law is the realization of reasonable expectations induced by promises.

Read More

More about Civil Law Vs Criminal Law Essay

Related Topics

Open Document