ipl-logo

What Are The Similarities Between The United States And Spain Court System

2011 Words9 Pages

This paper will compare the court systems of the United States and Spain which will explore the differences and similarities of the respective nations legal systems, Supreme Courts, and other aspects as it relates to the comparison of the these two nations judiciaries. Spain’s legal system is based in the civil law tradition in which its roots come from the law of Ancient Rome known as Roman law, in fact Spain was one of the first nations in Europe to apply civil law as the basis of its legal system during the age of exploration (Cal-Berkeley). A similarity of the civil law system as it relates to the common law system in the United States is that there has been at least of couple instances as it relates to property law that some courts in …show more content…

In law that is not codified, this means that instead of writing down numerous details of specific parts of the law, the Common law system instead relies mainly on precedent in which the judiciary will render it’s judgment regarding a particular area of law based off of past decisions in cases with similar content (Cal-Berkeley). Another difference is the role the judge plays in a court case. In the Civil law system, the judge’s decision making has to be within the confines of the law meaning that regardless of who the judge is they have to render a ruling based off of what the law says which doesn’t allow for the judge’s personal interpretation of the law (Cal-Berkeley). Also, judges in the Civil law system are essentially in addition to being the judge, is also the investigator, jury, and prosecutor in a sense because they are the ones who files the charges against the party and in addition to presiding over the case they …show more content…

The Constitutional Court which technically isn’t a part of the judiciary, however it does deal with conflicts as it pertains to the Spanish constitution that was drafted back in 1978 (Lasance). This means that although the Spanish Supreme Court is the highest judicial body in Spain its decisions can’t be in conflict with the constitution and in that instance only the Constitutional Court would have the power to overturn the decisions of the Court (Lasance). This situation unlike the judiciary of the United States in which the power to decide whether a law is in conflict of the United States Constitution is up to the U.S. Supreme Court itself to decide rather than an outside entity. Some of the lower courts include the Superior Justice Courts, Provincial Courts of Justice, and Courts of First Instance, Justice of the Peace Courts, and the National Court of Justice (Malavet). In the order of the Spanish judicial hierarchy, cases from the lower labor and administrative courts and cases from the Justice of the Peace Courts and Courts of First Instance are appealed up to the Provincial Justice Courts which deal with court cases from each of Spain’s 52 individual provinces (Lasance). From there

Show More
Related
622 Words | 3 Pages

The chapter portrays every single working bodies and gatherings in a situation where a wrongdoing has been carried out, and there is consequently a criminal case. It portrays the operation of the criminal court organizations and all their order. Chapter 12 first talks about the historical backdrop of the Texas politics. It further covers the whole connection of the Texas Politics under the same theme. The historical backdrop of Texas, and additionally the connection, involves all subtle element discussing the recorded foundation, the range's geology and its financial aspects.

Read More
2098 Words | 9 Pages

For this institution Pittonia will draw inspiration from the Canada. Canada’s court system is comprised of four tiers; the provincial and territorial lower courts, the provincial and territorial superior courts, the appellate courts, both regional and federal, and the Canadian Supreme Court (“Canada’s Court System”). By using a method such as this Pittonia will ensure that all areas needing judicial guidance are overseen. Borrowing more from the Canadian system, and not another similar one, such as the American system, Pittonia’s courts are all unified, and the Supreme Court retains the final authority, unlike in the American system, where states can interpret state laws as they see fit. With such a diverse population, it is necessary in some areas to have strict uniformity, so that there can be no dissent with interpretations between regions.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

To begin with, in the judicial system, there is an ongoing dispute over what compromises the proper amount of judicial power. This lack of agreement concerning policymaking power of the Courts is bestowed within the discussion between judicial activism and judicial restraint. In general, these two philosophies represent the conflicting approaches taken by judges in their task of interpretation. Consequently, the Court’s decision could be framed in terms of activism or restraint by either changing or upholding public policy.

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

The American Legal System The American legal system has been influenced by many historical rulers and laws. Three that have influenced the American legal system the most are Roman laws, moral laws and Hammurabi’s code in my opinion. One legal system that influenced the American legal system are Roman laws. I picked Roman law because it said that law has been defined as the “Art of social control”; a system of rules regulating the conduct of man.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

Out of the over 350,000 cases brought to trial in the United States District Courts in 2016, almost 275,000 of them were civil and nearly 80,000 were criminal. No matter the type of case brought to court, both present evidence in front of a judge, resulting in a sentence after careful deliberation. Although there are multiple similarities between civil law and criminal law, there are many differences that differentiate the two as well. A criminal case deals with any sort of punishable offense against society.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

Court Systems: Comparing Canada, the United States, and Mexico This paper is a discussion of the court systems of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The aim of the paper is to point highlight similarities and differences in each judicial system. It will allow the reader an insight to the how each country operates its judicial branch.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

In Texas, there are two separate high courts: The Supreme Court of Texas and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Having two separate high courts in Texas is good because make this system more professional. However, these two high court heard different cases. The Supreme Court of Texas is the highest civil and juvenile cases, and it is the final appellate jurisdiction in Texas. In contrast, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the highest and the final criminal court in Texas, and the jurisdiction of death penalty cases.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

The Texas and federal court systems are integral components of the American legal system, but they share both similarities and differences that distinguish them from one another. In this essay, I will discuss two similarities and two differences between these two court systems, examining their structures, method of selection, and types of cases heard. Firstly, the hierarchical structure is a fundamental similarity shared by both the Texas and federal court systems. Both systems employ a similar hierarchical structure that commences with trial courts and progresses through intermediate appellate courts to the highest court at the top.

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history, there have been many oppressive regimes all across the world. Whether it be the Mongol Empire of the 13th and 14th century, communist Russia led by Joseph Stalin, or even present day North Korea, totalitarian regimes have been prevalent throughout world history. These bleak realities are explored in the dystopian novel 1984. With a totalitarian government controlling every aspect of life, we are able to understand what it's like to live in such a place. George Orwell utilizes a third person narrator in order to convey how the protagonist, Winston, his spirit is slowly broken over time.

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

This paper will seek, to give some of the definitons of justice given throughout the first book leading up to the establishments of the two cities, then go on to establish which city I think is better and more just and why I believe so. The

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

The Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

It is true that Mexicans and Spaniards share similarities concerning language and culture, but there are far too many regional variations that make linguists say that Mexican Spanish qualifies to be a separate language, nonetheless, what does differ is that Spain’s political system is a Democratic government with an ‘international’ currency. Additionally, one can find a lot of Spanish influence in Mexican culture such as bull fights, foods like Spanish rice, and yes, Catholic Religion. Yet, it is easy to see the ancestral differences between Mexican and Spanish people due to their many different historical characteristics. Today, one difference between the two is that the Mexican political system is a close copy of the US system—at least on paper. However, the Mexican constitution provides only for a Federal system, unlike in Spain who recently has a revolution less than fifty years ago.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More
3020 Words | 13 Pages

Introduction Civil Justice System The civil justice system exists in order to enable individuals, businesses, and local and central government to vindicate, and where necessary, enforce their civil legal rights and obligations, whether those rights are private or public. It ensures that the rights and protection of citizens are called for. The rule of law dictates that government should not abuse their powers as per AV Dicey’s concept of the rule of law. In addition, the civil courts endorse economic activity, allowing contracts to be made between strangers because rights are taken care of in the courts if they are breached.

Read More

More about What Are The Similarities Between The United States And Spain Court System

Related Topics

Open Document