ipl-logo

Comparison Of Canada, The United States, And Mexico Court System

878 Words4 Pages

Court Systems: Comparing Canada, the United States, and Mexico

This paper is a discussion of the court systems of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The aim of the paper is to point highlight similarities and differences in each judicial system. It will allow the reader an insight to the how each country operates its judicial branch.
When considering the court systems between the Canada, United States, and Mexico, one must look further than courts themselves, at the Constitutions of the three countries and how they have changed to accurately assess the court systems. Initially, Canada's Constitution had envisioned a strong central government in control of the country, but in 1949 the Supreme court of Canada moved towards provincial powers …show more content…

Canada has four levels of the court which are as follows. The provincial/territorial (lower) court, which deals with most criminal offenses unless they are very serious. It also decides family law, youth offenders, traffic law or regulatory crime, small claims courts and initial investigations into serious crime. Another court at this level a special military court which is designed to handle misconduct of the …show more content…

At the lowest level of the state court system is the municipal court which reviews local ordinance violations such as traffic laws as well as some minor civil offenses. State Circuit Courts adjudicate in both civil and criminal court hearings, they often have special court for family and juvenile law cases. The State Court of Appeal decides matters of appeal from state court rulings. All US states have a Supreme Court to litigate further appeals for adherence to state laws.
Federal district courts are where most civil and criminal cases are tried. In addition to the district courts, some courts have been created to deal with specific issues. The Federal Bankruptcy court handles all bankruptcy hearings. The US Court of International trade which handles customs and trade issues. The US Court of Federal Claims which evaluates claims of monetary damages against the United States government. The Military has its own set of courts to determine matters of is soldiers.
The Federal Court of Appeals determines of federal law was followed in the district courts. The Supreme Court of the United States passes federal laws and is the final arbiter of law in the US as outlined in the United States Constitution. (Longley,

Show More
Related

Similarities Between The United States And Nevada

977 Words | 4 Pages

Massachusetts and Nevada are different in many ways when it comes to their government. From the number of terms one is able to serve in a certain position to the qualifications to become a voter both states have their own way of running themselves. It’s interesting to see how states governments can vary when it comes to local government and political parties and support programs for their residents. In Nevada, the Governor of the State of Nevada is the highest state office.

Read More

Craig Markham Analysis

1276 Words | 6 Pages

This method of legal governance was created based upon the common law system that is used in England and in some areas of Scotland. This organizational hierarchy is considered bi-jurisdictional, which is a result of the public and private laws being separated into the jurisdictions of the Parliament and the individual Provinces. Regardless of which unit is governing, each legal system is responsible for upholding the laws written in the Canadian Constitution. The Canadian Parliament has sole control over the transportation and energy infrastructures of the country, no matter which Province they reside

Read More

Comparing Michigan's Judicial System

2120 Words | 9 Pages

There are also no juries or witnesses and it involves only lawyers from both sides that argue the law and answer any questions the judges may have. There are seven judges at this level or one Chief Justice and six judges on the panel. The Chief Justice is elected by the court?s sitting judges and is elected a two-year term. Cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court that were heard in the Circuit Courts or the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court can override those courts decisions. The Supreme Court?s role is to guarantee a firm and reasonable judicial system and is the final arbitrator in disagreements that involve the state?s constitution and laws.

Read More

Examples Of Specialty Courts

150 Words | 1 Pages

Specialty courts are formed in order to staff them with people who have a great deal of knowledge on whatever special type of cases that court handles. For instance: Juvenile courts handle only cases that involve the proper punishment and rehabilitation of youthful offenders. Probate courts handle disagreements among heirs concerning the dispersal of estates of deceased persons.

Read More

District Courts Hear Infraction Cases

1014 Words | 5 Pages

In the intermediate court of appeals, cases heard can range from parking tickets to murder cases. Appeals cases come to this court from district courts or superior courts. There are no juries in these cases. Cases not resolved here may then submit an appeal to the state supreme court. In some cases an appeal may bypass the intermediate court of appeals and go directly to the Supreme Court.

Read More

The Five Levels Of The Texas Court System

249 Words | 1 Pages

The 2nd level is the County Level Courts. County Courts have jurisdiction over juvenile matters, misdemeanors with fines greater than 500$ or jail sentence, and probate matters. District Courts are the 3rd level. They have jurisdiction over felonious matters, divorce cases, land titles, and contested elections. The 4th level is the Courts of Appeals, which is the final step before the

Read More

Comparing The Israeli Legal Systems Vs. The US's Legal System

581 Words | 3 Pages

Israeli Legal System vs. the U.S.'s Legal System The synthesis of the legal system permits the Israeli Supreme Court judges to pass judgment on a more extensive scale. The judges have the discretion to give rulings according to deductive thinking.1 A peculiar aspect in the Israeli legal structure is that case laws of a court guide the lower courts including the supreme court decisions which control the lower court, however the lower courts are not bound by the decisions. There are panels in the Supreme Court which hear cases, and none of the panels is obligated to adhere to the decisions of another panel.2 The different panels at the Israeli Court system hasten the hearing process unlike the US, where the panel of judges is fixed.3 In Israel,

Read More

Govt 120 Week 2 Case Study: German Political System

1396 Words | 6 Pages

German judiciary system practices civil law. The judiciary system of German has three court system and they are ordinary courts, specialized courts, and federal constitutional courts. Ordinary courts basically are responsible to dealing with criminal and civil cases. The federal court of justice of Germany is the highest ordinary court in the country. It is also the highest court of appeals that most of the cases go there for the highest appeals to be heard by the federal judges.

Read More

Laws: Similarities Between The Aztecs And Criminal Law

371 Words | 2 Pages

The Aztecs had courts with rules similar to America’s. In the Aztec

Read More

Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

492 Words | 2 Pages

The three levels within the federal courts are: the U.S. Magistrate Courts, the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The magistrate courts are the lowest level and as such are limited to trying misdemeanors, setting bail amounts and assisting the district courts. The U.S. District Courts are the federal branch of original jurisdiction courts. These are responsible for criminal trials and giving guilty or not guilty verdicts. The U.S. Courts of Appeals are responsible for all the appeals from U.S. district courts.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

Comparative Justice System In Canada And The United States

592 Words | 3 Pages

When you compare the Justice system around the world through punishment, structure, and religion it is typically called comparative justice. There are four legal traditions that most countries work with such as common law, which derived from the British Empire. Common law is still in areas of current or former British territories. The second legal tradition is civil law, which originates in Europe, and is still used in America’s state of Louisiana, and Canada’s Quebec. Even though Canada & the U. S’s countries are still mostly using common law.

Read More

The Canadian Judicial System

1155 Words | 5 Pages

Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.

Read More

Comparing The Cultural Dimensions Of Canada And The Republic Of Belarus

857 Words | 4 Pages

The cultural dimensions of Canada and the Republic of Belarus provide insight as to why the structure and nature of the judicial systems differ from one another. However, before interpreting these dimensions, it is important to note that although the Republic of Belarus was established in 1994, it resembles Russia almost entirely in terms of culture. Therefore Hofstede’s study of Russia’s Cultural Dimensions is applicable to the Republic of Belarus. The Canadian structure and nature of its judicial system can be explained due to its high level of individualism (80) and low power distance (39). The high level of individualism can explain the reason why alternative to courts are accepted in Canada.

Read More

Role Of Judiciary In Malaysia

1103 Words | 5 Pages

The hierarchy of courts of Malaysia begins with the Magistrates’ Court, followed by the Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and finally is the Federal Court of Malaysia. There are generally two types of trials, criminal and civil. The jurisdiction of the courts in civil or criminal matters are contained in the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 and the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Article 121 of the Constitution provides for two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the High Court in Malaya, and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. Thus this creates two separate local jurisdiction of the courts – for Peninsular Malaysia and for East Malaysia.

Read More

More about Comparison Of Canada, The United States, And Mexico Court System

Related Topics

Open Document