ipl-logo

Determinism Vs Libertarianism

1720 Words7 Pages

It is not easy to have one of your moral beliefs challenged. Free will is something a lot of people believe in and it is why humans are suggested to have moral responsibility. What would it be like to find out that we as humans do not have free will and that all of our actions are determined based on our past experiences? Deciding whether humans have free will or not is an immense task. There are many arguments to suggest that we have free will and there are others to suggest that we do not and that our acts are completely determined. This is the battle of the libertarians against the determinists.
Before contemplating the idea of free will, there was no doubt in my mind that we as human had choices in every situation and we got to choose …show more content…

Hard determinism is factual, it can be applied to all of our acts, and there is no valuable evidence to destroy this view. Moral responsibility and punishment are the two arguments that philosophers use against determinism. Hard determinists believe that moral responsibility does not exist because we do not have the choice to make our decisions. This also makes it difficult to punish people because there is no way to stop someone from doing an act in the eyes of the determinist. Moral responsibility and punishment are arguing the same idea, which is easily rebuked by the determinists. Many determinists feel that punishment is not justifiable because all acts are determined and these false acts they will be committed anyway. Some determinists, like Hospers, have a different view on punishment. Hospers believes in hard determinism, yet he still believes there is a reason for punishment. He believes that even though the false acts were completely determined, “they (the ones committing the act) must be removed from society for our own protection” (Hospers, 352). The view of the determinist is simple; our actions are determined by our previous causes, but we must still punish those who commit false actions in order to protect society. While it may not be justifiable to punish those who’s actions were determined, it is a way to change their behavior and keep the rest of society safe. Hard determinism simply states that all of our acts are completely necessitated by previous causes and there is no way we can use a free act to choose another path because free will does not

Show More
Related

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Matt Ridley's Free Will

998 Words | 4 Pages

In this well-thought, extensive piece by Matt Ridley, Free Will starts off humorously with the demonstration of free will and takes us through the factors that influence it. “Society, culture and nurture.” Ridley says, are the factors and elaborates to the full extent of life as to do we have free will or not. Defending his claim that free will can be obtained against the host of critics and their sources, he analyzes and contradicts through his extensive knowledge, strong examples, and his own host of supporting credible people to shield his claim; his rhetorical strategies strongly support and defend his claim. To support the very first claim that he steps on to about the influences of free will, Ridley says, “ Everyone’s fate is determined

Read More

Harry Frankfurt's Argument Essay

1797 Words | 8 Pages

“Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision and action, is the inevitable and necessary consequence of antecedent states of affairs”(Information Philosopher, 2015). It refers to the claim that, at any moment or place in time, there is only one possible future for the whole universe. However, the concept of determinism often comes into question when looking into whether human beings possess free will. Free Will can be defined as “the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion” (Defence of Reason, 2014). The very definition of the terms determinism and free will appear to be conflicting however, many philosophical thinkers

Read More

Reading Assignment Ch 9 And 11: Wundt, Titchner And James

523 Words | 3 Pages

Baylee Ray Blanton – Reading Assignment Ch 9 and 11: Wundt, Titchner, and James Word Count: According to the text, free will is synonymous with the term nondeterminism, in short, the opposite of determinism. Determinism, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary is a philosophical belief that “acts of the will” are causally determined by natural laws and preceding events. Expressed in another way, the text states that a determinist believes events to be due to a finite number of different causes, and that if these causes were known, once could predict anything with “complete accuracy.”

Read More

Of Galen Strawson's Argument Of Moral Responsibility

1514 Words | 7 Pages

In the free will debate, Strawson is firm in his belief that there is a fundamental sense in which free will is impossible regardless of whether or not determinism is true(pg.309). Strawson represents his position in what is known as the “basic argument”, a three-premise argument that draws the conclusion that no one is ultimately morally responsible for their actions. The first premise is “When I act or choose to act I do so because of the way I am psychologically(pg.309). This idea is based on the fact that we act upon motives. The second premise is “To be ultimately morally responsible for how I act, I must be untimely responsible for the way I am psychologically(pg.309).

Read More

Chisholm's Human Freedom And The Self

1445 Words | 6 Pages

In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick Chisholm has taken a libertarian approach on the issue of free will and determinism. Libertarians believe that humans have free will and make a distinction that free will and determinism are incompatible. Chisholm has the same opinion. On the problem of human freedom, Chisholm thinks that “Human beings are responsible agents; but this fact appears to conflict with a deterministic view of human action (the view that every event that is involved in an act is caused by some other event); and it also appears to conflict with an indeterministic view of human action (the view that the act, or some event that is essential to the act, is not caused at all).”(Page 3). He does not agree that determinism or indeterminism

Read More

Baron D Hydraulic Model Of Determinism

816 Words | 4 Pages

In all, being “self-determined and responsible for one’s own actions.” When referring to physical determinism I will be speaking about the view that everything that happens has a relatable physical

Read More

Baron D Holbach's Theory Of Determinism

889 Words | 4 Pages

Determinism is a theory that all things in the world is governed by laws. This theory is based upon the materialist view of the body and mind. Materialists think that all things that exist in this world matter. We, humans, have mind or souls and desired interests are based upon actions. This principal argues that we have no moral responsibilities and choices.

Read More

Libertarianism Vs Compatibilism

500 Words | 2 Pages

In “Free Will and Determinism”, Theodore Sider introduced different perspectives on free will, namely hard determinism, libertarianism and compatibilism. Hard determinists reject free will, whereas libertarians reject determinism. And, compatibilists took believe that determinism and free will can co-exist by redefining free will as “a free action is one that is caused by the person’s beliefs and desires, provided that those beliefs and desires flow from ‘who the person is’.”

Read More

Libertarianism Self Government

1584 Words | 7 Pages

Primarily, the personal liberties of the individuals. With having a primary emphasis on personal liberties, libertarianism believes in as little government interaction as possible because of the belief that a strong government will result in a loss of the personal liberties of the people. As said by Sharon Harris, the President of Advocates for Self-Government, “Libertarians believe that each person owns his own life and property and has the right to make his own choices as to how he lives his life and uses his property – as long as he simply respects the equal right of others to do the same” (theadvocates.org). In short, each person has the sole control of how they choose to live their live and control their property, as long as the basic rights of man are respected, there is no need for interference from the government. The primary followers of libertarianism are individuals who believe that the government has become too strong and too involved in the lives of the people.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Fate Vs. Free Will

803 Words | 4 Pages

Given the idea of free-will, people feel more independent. By believing in free-will, a person is thought to have control in their choices. According to Commentary on Science and Society, people want to have freedom in their choices. This statement reveals that most people believe in free-will because of their need to be independent and have control

Read More

Thomas Nagel Free Will Summary

501 Words | 3 Pages

By choosing to act a certain way instead of another, you had the freedom to act any way you wanted to and differently. Choices that you make are not predetermined in the future which means that determinism itself has to be wrong. This means that we have the absolute free will over every single choice made in our daily lives. If someone does something wrong, why should they be punished if they were just simply going by their predetermined script? If that were true, they’d have no say over their wrong choices, just like the rain has no say for falling from the sky.

Read More

Determinism Vs Free Will

1777 Words | 8 Pages

Taylor’s philosophy and view on determinism, free will and moral responsibility reflects the libertarian philosophic position. He attaches large importance to free will and free choice of a person. Taylor asserts that “certain events (namely, human choices) are not completely determined by preceding events; rather, they are caused by the agent of the choice (the person doing the choosing)” (Free Will). This view differs from that of Blatchford, Schlick and Hospers who deny free choice concluding that everything is determined in our decisions and actions.

Read More

Persuasive Speech Outline On Abortion

1277 Words | 6 Pages

“I believe the freedom to choose my course in life but I do not believe I am free to choose the consequences of my

Read More

Arguments Against Free Will Essay

1075 Words | 5 Pages

Determinism is the claim that every event is determined by the past and laws of nature 2. If every event is determined by the past and laws of nature, then each of my actions is determined by the past and the laws of nature 3. If one of my actions is determined by the past and the laws of nature, then I could not have done otherwise than action unless I can control the past and the laws of

Read More

Difference Between Determinism And Libertarianism

1216 Words | 5 Pages

Determinism and Libertarianism For many years, people have discussed how we choose what to do and what is the reason for choosing what to do. According to determinism, our actions are out of control. Determinism claims that whatever we do is determined by previous events; therefore, we should not be countable for whatever we do. Libertarianism, on the other hand, rejects the determinism and claims that everything we do is voluntary and we are free to make decisions. Unlike a determinist, a libertarian would argue that whatever we do could be different if we desired to choose differently and if it were physically possible to choose differently.

Read More

More about Determinism Vs Libertarianism

Related Topics

Open Document