ipl-logo

Libertarianism Vs Compatibilism

500 Words2 Pages

In this essay, I will argue that the compatibilist definition of free will as a reply to the problem of evil is possible under one condition: suppose that there is no contradiction in the supposition that God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent, and God creates human who engage in moral evil.

First, I will introduce both compatibilism and libertarianism. Next, I will address the reason Plantinga chose to adopt libertarian conception of free will, instead of the libertarian ones. Furthermore, I will replace Plantinga’s libertarian version with the compatibilist version and explain how the compatibilist version works by simply redefining compatibilism.

In “Free Will and Determinism”, Theodore Sider introduced different perspectives on free will, namely hard determinism, libertarianism and compatibilism. Hard determinists reject free will, whereas libertarians reject determinism. And, compatibilists took believe that determinism and free will can co-exist by redefining free will as “a free action is one that is caused by the person’s beliefs and desires, provided that those beliefs and desires flow from ‘who the person is’.” …show more content…

On compatibilism, Plantinga would argue that if libertarianism is true, an omnipotent God will create men who were free and never choose to do evil. Therefore, the free will defense against the problem of evil would

Show More
Related
1351 Words | 6 Pages

Equally as important as the previous subject, Chance in chapter five, is particularly imperative because it mentions deep theological and philosophical cases such as: case for theistic determinism as well as a case for theistic nondeterminism. The authors evenly divide the explanation of both the theists and non-theists in separate pages to distinguish the differences between them, including some examples and figures. Based on the argument between the two cases, the determinist insists and argues that God is the highest power of this universe, and therefore excludes ontological doubt. In comparison, the non-determinist believes that God has created the physical universe with a freedom to choose and a life of its

Read More
2024 Words | 9 Pages

Bill C-51: A Critical Look Into the Proposed Bill as It Stands. Since the incidents of september 11 2001, most western countries instituted and updated its anti terrorism laws in order to increase national security and have tools that could counter any terrorist activities that could potentially harm a country's citizens at home or abroad. Canada being one of these countries had established Anti terrorism laws that had been sufficient enough to prevent any terrorist plots against canada in the years leading up to 2014. However after the recent events of the shooting at parliament hill, the conservative government has put forth another bill in order to draconian the anti terrorism laws.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

The case of Robert Alton Harris, a convicted murderer who was executed in 1992 for his crimes, raises profound questions about free will and moral responsibility. In this essay, I will argue that Harris did not exercise free agency when committing the crimes, that he could not have done otherwise, and that he is morally responsible for his actions despite his background. Moreover, I will show how this scenario can be used to shed light on the possibility of free will and moral responsibility in a deterministic universe. First, let us consider the facts of the case.

Read More
1353 Words | 6 Pages

McCloskey specifically discusses the free will argument, asking “might not God have very easily so have arranged the world and biased man to virtue that men always freely chose what is right?” God creates a world with both free will and evil in it. Planting’s argument is a free will defense. Evans and Manis says it is sufficient to know that there are possible reasons why an all-good, omnipotent being might allow evil Pgs. 166-167, without being able to know God’s actual reasons.

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

He describes the objection as, “all men desire the apparent good, but have no control over the appearance, but the end appears to each man in a form answering to his character” (1114b).   This view argues that all people pursue that which seems good, but some people cannot see the true good, which is out of their control.   The immediate implication of this objection, if it is indeed true, suggests that “no one is responsible for his own evildoing” (1114b).

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

In theory, he thinks that if God exists then evil should not, but it does. So he creates and argues a theodicy to show that God and evil can exist at the same time. He comes up with the “Free Will Theodicy” which states that humans are the cause of evil, not God. The Free Will Theodicy discusses two kinds of evil: moral evil and natural evil.

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout this year I have grown to be a “hard” psychological determinist and will be arguing that free will is at no time compatible with universal physical determinism. I will be proving that these two “things” cannot co-exist by disproving three theories that say they have potential for them to do so or can. Baron d’Holbach’s material metaphysical view on free will has both positive and negative connotations that I will be explaining further in the essay. Alfred Jules Ayer’s compatibilist way of thinking provides insufficient evidence to give his argument credibility. Finally, Roderick Chisholm’s libertarian causation way of thinking is an unsatisfactory ideology.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Hard determinists and compatibilists may raise objections to this explanation. One of the major objections that they could ask is what is so special about human beings? Libertarians seem to be ok explaining every other event in the world through causal determinism. Yet, they appeal to this distinct sense of agent causation when it comes to humans. In response, libertarians would argue that humans are distinct from most everything in the natural world.

Read More
2349 Words | 10 Pages

This paper will discuss the problem of evil. In the first part, I will discuss Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s atheist stance and William Lane Craig’s theist stance on the problem of evil. In the final part of this paper, I will argue that Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s argument is stronger. The Problem of Evil

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

Essay 2 My goal in this paper is to show that Swinburne’s solution to the Problem of Evil is persuasive. I begin with a formulation of Swinburne’s thoughts about the similarity and difference between moral evil and natural evil. I then formulate the connection between evil and free will. Next, I consider the potentiality objection to this argument, and Swinburne’s response to this objection.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

Philosopher William Rowe agrees with Plantinga that propositions — that evil exists, God is omnipotent, and God is wholly good — is not logically inconsistent. Rowe does not believe it is impossible to allow God and his properties to exist along with evil. He takes a different route by focusing more on certain kinds of evil which evidently exist in the world, and not so much on the inconsistencies of the theist doctrines. This certain evil, in Rowe’s point of view, will show that a God who is all powerful and wholly good does not exist after all.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

As dark clouds of smoke suspended above the crematoriums in many of the concentration camps during World War II, Jewish people alongside other minorities facing Nazi oppression questioned their fate in this time of devastating horror; however, those who were not immediately killed oftentimes witnessed an even worse fate under the power of the Nazi physician Dr. Josef Mengele. During the Holocaust, Mengele was one of the most well known doctors in the concentration camps for his brutal, immoral experiments and research trials in which he abused thousands of Holocaust victims. While minority groups such as Jews and Roma Gypsies were cruelly oppressed in numerous ways during the Holocaust, some of the most heinous acts of cruelty were committed

Read More
1777 Words | 8 Pages

Determinism, free will and moral responsibility (1681 words) Table of contents: Introduction. Blatchford’s view on determinism, free will, and moral responsibility. Schlick’s determinism, freedom and responsibility. Hospers’s position.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

One might object to the Problem of Evil by giving a theodicy. A theodicy is basically a justification that explains why God allows evil things to happen even though he is all-PGK. In addition, a theodicy is on the “God is all-PGK” side because it might prove that evil is needed in this world in intention of God, and evil is, of course, under control of God. One theodicy is free will. Free will is a gift from God.

Read More

More about Libertarianism Vs Compatibilism

Related Topics

Open Document