Did you know that Mathilde and Emily have somewhat in common? Yes they essentially do, and it is that they demand so much that they cannot let go of some kind of entity. As for both, they do vary in how they are analyzed though their actions, or their characteristics. Deep down somewhere, those women’s circumstances were immoral in many habits. To illustrate, both women inside felt incomplete that they lost what they desired. What is meant to be said is that both either have lost something, or wanted something. Nevertheless, both of them were missing something that clearly ruins their conditions in life. Consequently, Mathilde Loisel from “The Diamond Necklace” and Emily Grierson from “A Rose for Emily” are two women from two different short stories who faced different circumstances throughout a phase of their life.
To begin with, Miss Emily Grierson is quite a strange character with an erratic behavior due to the fact that her situation could go in any number of directions. It is quite impossible not to determine Miss Emily’s being physiological in a strange manner. In “A Rose for Emily”, Miss Emily’s irregular behavior becomes unusual, and the reader is figuring out how to explain the thought that Miss Emily had been sleeping with the corpse for several years. According to one of the quotes that had been quoted by the narrator, “Then we
…show more content…
For example, Mathilde Loisel from “The Necklace” wants to be rich, and buy expensive things, and clearly wants more. As for Miss Emily from “A Rose for Emily”, she could not let go of her father, nor Homer. Seeming that Miss Emily wants both men to part of her life as how they made her life better in such ways. Same goes for Mathilde, she wants the wealthy life as it would enhance her living conditions which would make her live in a wondrous fairy tale