Martin Luther King's letter from Birmingham Jail and Henry Davis Thoreau's Civil Disobedience share similar views on the moral and political corruptness of the nation. However, a plethora of circumstances differentiate the two activist in their styles and purposes. Kings indigent tone and his attention grabbing use of pathos created a more relatable atmosphere between himself and his audience. While Thoreau's text remains more detached from the situation; this caused a failure to engage his audience with as much success as Martin Luther King . While both texts clearly share views relation toward the need for just laws paired with equal rights to all who live in America, Dr. King demonstrates greater accomplishment in persuading his audience than Thoreau. …show more content…
While Thoreau certainly uses pathos to influence the reader, his use of it was far less personal and, moreover, less effective than King’s “Letter to a Birmingham Jail”. In paragraph seven, King explains the reason why people who say "wait" do not understand why such a request is unobtainable and impractical. He uses hypothetical and true, personal, anecdotes to strengthen and support his clause. His examples strive to successfully penetrate through the dubiety of his most skeptical readers. In comparison to Thoreau, King also uses loaded words in a more frequent manner throughout his text. For example, "abyss of despair", "appalling science", "frightening radical nightmare", and "psalm of brotherhood". While the use of strong words like "innocent blood" "revelation" and "abused and perverted" undeniably gave Thoreau's writing a more urgent tone, King’s writing created a very personal atmosphere in which his reader unconsciously becomes more apt to being open minded about his ideas or