Analysis Of Diego River The Painting On The Wall

704 Words3 Pages

Diego Rivera: Mexican Painter Diego Rivera was a big man both literally and figuratively. He dominated the Mexican art world from after the Mexican revolution until his death. In the online article entitled, “The Painting on the Wall”, by Peter Schjeldahl, we see Rivera revive and put to use the antique medium of fresco painting. The Fresco painting used things such as pigments to impregnate a paste of marble, dust and water-treated lime (Schjeldahl). This helped to dry rocks into a more hardened state. Because of Rivera’s positive energy, he was able to win the hearts of all sorts of people. These people ranged from the French all the way to the American people. From 1910 to 1920 the Mexican revolution was a response created by Porfiro Diaz’s …show more content…

Their clothing and skin tones show us that they are hard working members of society and not of those in power. By having the women come to the aid of the fatigued worker, Rivera points to the good nature of the common people (The Flower Carrier).The flowers are very important in terms of showing symbolism. The peasant isn’t carrying any other crops; he is collecting flowers instead. The flowers are a product only used to adorn the homes of the wealthy and those in power. Because of this,Rivera is implying that the excessive, luxurious lifestyle of the upper class is debilitating to the lower classes. In the article “Diego Rivera: Painting and Partisanship” by Adolfo Vazquez; Diego Rivera demonstrated in an exemplary way that art is able to realize an elevated function politically without having to compromise the aesthetic quality of the artwork(Vazquez). Painting and partisanship: these are two realms that aesthetes and average artists believe to be irreconcilably divided, yet when they are engaged by a brilliant artist like Diego Rivera they can be shaped into an indivisible